Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
LettersByPublished on February 08, 1996Content-ed Richard D. Stern Editor's note: Very infrequently, because of space limitations or, frankly, lack of scintillating correspondence, we don't print a Letters section. "Very infrequently" means two or three times a year. Warming Shot "Eccentric" would be an understatement to describe the only scientist quoted in disagreement with the consensus of 2,500 (!) of his peers on "the leading international panel of climatologists"--all of whom conclude that global warming is a fact with potentially severe effects. The extent to which corporations increasingly shape intellectual debate at universities by subsidizing scientists who hold positions sympathetic to their continued rape of the environment for profit is well-known. However, as the director of the largest grassroots consumer/environmental organization in Arizona, I expect New Times to cut through corporate smoke screens. With a little more digging, Plank could have written a great exposŽ detailing the timing and amounts of the payoffs/research grants from the fossil-fuel industry to Balling and his colleagues. My suggested title: "How big oil companies are using a few hundred thousand of their dollars to turn millions of your taxpayer dollars at ASU into a PR campaign questioning the environmental dangers of global warming." Jim Driscoll, state director Ted Reckoning Nugent did the same thing I would have done in a similar situation--and I have. When someone comes into your home (office) and calls your hard work garbage, I'd throw him out, too! Patti Walbridge
write your comment
|