By Ray Stern
By Ray Stern
By New Times
By Amy Silverman
By Stephen Lemons
By Stephen Lemons
By Monica Alonzo
By Chris Parker
Far be it from me to suggest New Times practice responsible journalism. It's repeatedly shown an inability to do that. But is it asking too much to refrain from giving the resident wackos and sickos more nasty ideas? It's time New Times folks cracked open the Webster's and looked up the word "humor." They obviously just don't get it.
Having worked in the restaurant industry for more than 10 years, I've had the opportunity to meet and befriend many special people. Recently, I was blessed with the good fortune of becoming acquainted with Oscar Fuchslocher and Jennifer Mehall ("Closed Door Policy," Amy Silverman, January 9). Oscar and Jennifer frequent the restaurant where I work and always request to dine in my station. I've served thousands of couples before, but I can honestly say I've never seen two people more in love and more deserving of each other than Oscar and Jennifer. We should all be so lucky.
Now, Oscar sits in a jail cell unable to spend his first married holidays with his wife and his family because of some obviously unscrutinized law passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton giving the U.S. attorney general the sole rights to strip immigrants of any constitutional rights, more specifically, Fifth Amendment rights. I understand there is an immigration problem in this country, but is blatantly disregarding our country's Constitution, for which our country was founded, the answer? No!
Oscar Fuchslocher symbolizes what this country should be about. He came to America because he thought this was a place where he could make his dreams come true. He worked hard, paid his taxes, educated himself, and was ready to start a family when the power-hungry immigration service decided to make an example of him, regardless if he was married to a U.S. citizen. And if that's what this country is coming to, I'm embarrassed to be a citizen. The U.S. attorney general needs to release Fuchslocher immediately, emphatically apologize to him and reimburse him financially for the time he has been incarcerated. Of course, this will never replace the time these newlyweds lost, thanks to governmental stupidity, during their first year of marriage. Good luck, Oscar and Jen! Remember, in the end, love (not justice) will prevail.
The person who works for Maricopa County Superior Court who agrees with John Mecklin's findings about Sheriff Joe Arpaio needs to find another job (Letters, January 9). If he's not happy doing what he's doing, move on! Let Arpaio be proud of his Tent City and chain gangs. There needs to be more sheriffs like Arpaio. Prisoners need to realize they're not on vacation. Cleaning the highways is great for Arizona, as is whatever else Arpaio has the prisoners do. I think torture is very far-fetched. And about aiding them: They get three hots and a cot. Correction means "discipline." Look it up.
Tony Ortega must be commended for his article about Viper member Chuck Knight ("Sticking By His Guns," January 2). The article went a long way toward putting a human face on a person long maligned by a largely biased and ignorant mainstream media.
Having been very close to this case from the onset, and having attended the entire detention hearings from day one, I can say that Ortega has done his homework. As a former federal explosives and arson investigator, I can say without reservation that the case against Knight is not about justice. Rather, it is a vendetta by U.S. Attorney Janet Napolitano and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
Because President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno wound up with egg on their faces for publicly stating that these people were plotting to blow up federal buildings, which soon proved to be utterly false, the government has waged an all-out campaign to make an example of the Vipers. To this end, the handling of this case has been orchestrated from Washington, D.C.
The Department of Justice has decreed that all the Vipers enter into a plea-bargain agreement in which each member, guilty or not, pleads guilty to multiple counts of conspiracy to manufacture and possess destructive devices. This plea agreement requires that all members serve federal prison time and be subject to enormous fines. In other words, they are to be made examples.
With the enormous government pressure, the public defenders in this case have caved in and advised their clients to plead guilty en masse. Most of those charged have pleaded guilty and are at the mercy of the federal judicial system. However, Charles Knight III has refused and is demanding a jury trial. Not only does Knight know that he is innocent of the charges, so does the government!