By Ray Stern
By New Times
By Amy Silverman
By Stephen Lemons
By Stephen Lemons
By Monica Alonzo
By Chris Parker
By New Times
She only changed her mind, she says, because it wouldn't be smart to commit an assault on camera.
Barwood says she's furious with Rimsza after finding what she claims to be proof that she was "set up" by Rimsza and the city's professional staff in the September 1995 rezoning vote which allowed a controversial silicon-wafer plant to be located near a residential neighborhood in her district.
Opponents to the Sumitomo-Sitix plant have long insisted that city leaders knew the factory's location was a done deal as early as March 1995 and that they purposefully kept citizens in the dark to prevent opposition to the plant, which uses extremely hazardous chemicals.
In particular, the plant's opponents have blamed Barwood, who represents the Desert Ridge area, for helping Sumitomo-Sitix locate its plant near homes before residents had a chance to contest it.
Now, in a stunning turn of events, Barwood agrees, at least in part, with those angry residents.
Barwood says she is furious after obtaining a letter which Mayor Rimsza wrote to Reijiro Mori, Sumitomo-Sitix's president in Japan, on July 3, 1995.
The letter indicates that Mayor Rimsza knew that Sumitomo was "investigating the Desert Ridge site, as well as permitting and infrastructure schedules" a full two months before the council vote.
Other documents found by plant opponents have shown that the city's staff reassured Sumitomo the zoning changes needed for the plant would go smoothly (something experienced zoning attorneys never promise clients), but this is the first direct evidence that Rimsza was aware of those negotiations at a time when Sumitomo's name was kept off all official publicity related to the rezoning.
Barwood says it's clear evidence that she was betrayed by Rimsza.
Barwood has insisted that she voted in September 1995 to rezone Desert Ridge so that a "high-tech firm" could locate there, but that she did not know the city had already promised the site to Sumitomo for a silicon-wafer plant.
"We voted on this in September. Up to that point at least I, and I'm assuming the rest of the council, was not told that Sumitomo-Sitix was the high-tech firm they were talking about. I had read in the paper they were looking at Phoenix, but nothing was mentioned in there that it was the Desert Ridge village core," Barwood says.
After the vote, fierce opposition to the plant arose among the residents near the site--but too late, the city claims, to stop the project.
Those opponents have taken their battle against the plant to court, but they have also targeted Barwood with a recall effort, charging her with knowing full well that the rezoning would benefit Sumitomo.
Alarmed by the furor over the zoning vote, Barwood says she approached city planner David Reichert, who she claims told her that the entire council had been kept in the dark to prevent the possibility of "insider information." (Reichert says he remembers saying no such thing.)
She now believes she was lied to.
Two weeks ago, during a deposition in developer Johnson International's lawsuit against the city--one of several spawned by the rezoning for the wafer plant--Barwood was given a copy of Rimsza's letter by an attorney who questioned her claim that she didn't have foreknowledge of Sumitomo's plans.
"I just about had a stroke at that point," Barwood says. "I mean, not only was I lied to, but for a year and a half, I had been out there being attacked all over the place, and [Rimsza] left me out there. And he knew the whole time that what [plant opponents] were saying was partially true, that there was apparently a deal struck ahead of time. . . . I was never at a meeting where Sumitomo was mentioned, before the vote.
"This whole BS in the papers that [Sumitomo] couldn't decide between Phoenix and Portland was a scam," Barwood says, alluding to the mountain of incentives--such as $11 million in infrastructure costs--that Phoenix offered the global business giant in the months before the September vote. "Obviously from Skip's letter, they had already decided, he had already decided. It was signed, sealed and delivered; he was going to give away the farm to get it. That is obvious to me. I feel like I've been had."
Barwood claims that she's the victim of a fairly elaborate scheme by the mayor, whose aides referred calls from New Times to the professional staff. Attempts to contact the mayor directly were unsuccessful.
"I really feel like I was hung out there, because he felt it was a great way to get rid of me," Barwood says. "And the second thing is he had made all these deals and he didn't want that to come out. And I'm furious. I mean, I'm really furious. . . . When you see this letter and there's no cc's to anybody, that means he wanted it between him and the president of Sumitomo-Sitix in Japan and nobody else. . . .
"I'm so furious I really don't know what my reaction will be when I see him the next time."