By New Times
By Connor Radnovich
By Robrt L. Pela and Amy Silverman
By Ray Stern
By Keegan Hamilton
By Matthew Hendley
By Monica Alonzo
By Monica Alonzo
"Richard S. Berry shall pay . . . $172,103 within ten days. This amount represents the fees received in Chapter 13 cases in violation of this court's order entered January 24, 1997.
"The court finds Richard S. Berry in civil contempt of this court and imposes . . . a $100,000 fine to be paid in no event later than ten days from the date of this order.
"If Berry has failed to pay the fees and fine, the court will determine whether or not criminal contempt by Richard S. Berry should be certified to the United States District Court." (Emphasis his.)
It seemed Berry's day of reckoning was at hand. The deadline passed without him paying any of the fine or trustees or hundreds of debtors whom Berry's firm, People's Paralegal, illegally had overcharged.
But this is Bankruptcy Court, where Berry--a disbarred attorney and white-collar felon--apparently is allowed to ignore court orders with impunity. Representing himself, the 55-year-old Berry danced around Nielsen's questions about why he had repeatedly violated a judge's orders in recent months.
"If this were a situation where I had a pot of gold someplace, this would be another matter," Berry said. "Right now, business is quite limited."
That prompted a courtroom observer to whisper, "I'm gonna try that next time I get a traffic ticket."
Chapter 13 trustee Russell Brown implored Nielsen to refer the Berry case to District Court for criminal prosecution.
"He's paid no attention to any of this," said Brown, one of Berry's most persistent detractors.
United States Trustee Adrianne Kalyna told the judge she doubted "very seriously" whether Berry ever would remit a dime.
Berry's reply: "I never cease to amaze at her comments."
Finally, the gentlemanly Nielsen spoke from the bench.
"We have to keep things under control," he said. ". . . Now we have this horrendous problem."
The judge's solution was to act as peacemaker, as if he hadn't just been told--courteously and slickly--by an ex-con to stick it. Nielsen said nothing to Berry about the blatant disregard of his court order. Instead, he said he hoped matters could be worked out amicably for all concerned.
Kalyna, Brown and others who have been battling Berry for months declined to comment after the hearing. But their downcast expressions spoke volumes.
A New Times story ("Going for Broke," July 17) told of Dick Berry and People's Paralegal. The money-generating mill took the Valley's bankruptcy market by storm in 1996, luring more than 2,000 consumers in a relentless 18-month advertising blitz that promised cheap, quality service without attorneys.
But numerous debtors unnecessarily lost homes and cars or found their bankruptcy cases in tatters after taking the company's illegal and often-misguided advice. The state's seven bankruptcy judges have been tardy in grasping the magnitude of the People's Paralegal crisis, and slow to enact remedies.
The story disclosed that Berry's firm still was preparing bankruptcy petitions in clear violation of a May 23 order by Bankruptcy Judge Redfield T. Baum.
Berry had contracted with Tempe attorney Fred Taylor in a dubious arrangement that has caused grief for hundreds of debtors. Taylor, a sole practitioner with little experience in bankruptcy law, essentially has acted as a front for People's Paralegal, doing little more than signing paperwork for customers of People's Paralegal.
The story showed that Phoenix-area Chapter 13 debtors who use document-preparation services are about 10 times less likely to have their bankruptcy reorganization plans approved than those who retain attorneys. That failure rate has translated into unnecessary home foreclosures, auto repossessions and tax levies.
Since the story's publication, the Arizona Attorney General's Office has initiated a criminal investigation into People's Paralegal. On Monday, August 25, court records show, an AG's investigator went undercover to People's Paralegal, located at 1845 East Broadway in Tempe.
A transcript of a secretly audiotaped conversation filed by the U.S. trustee in Bankruptcy Court indicates that AG investigator Dan Bultman--posing as a potential customer--tells a receptionist he wants to get out of debt. The receptionist offers Bultman the option of People's Paralegal or Debt-Free America. (The latter is a "debt consolidation" entity opened recently by Berry and Paul Dvorscak, also a convicted white-collar felon who served prison time in 1995 for fraud.)
Bultman tells the receptionist he sees that People's Paralegal is affiliated with attorney Fred Taylor.
"I don't want a lawyer," the investigator says.
"Oh, no," she replies. "We go by People's Paralegal law offices. For bankruptcy, they need a lawyer just to represent them in court."
Bultman then meets with office salesman Hugh Marks, who explains how the operation works and provides legal advice:
"The whole thing with this is we have one attorney on staff rather than a whole office full of them . . . 90 percent of what we do here is bankruptcy so we just have the one attorney on staff. . . . He doesn't do much other than sign off [on documents]."
Arizona is one of two states--Texas is the other--that doesn't consider the unauthorized dispensing of legal advice to be a crime. But Bultman works in an AG's unit that investigates consumer fraud, which is a crime.
A phlegmatic man in his mid-30s, Taylor seemed dazed during the first of the two appearances, before Judge Case. Case was considering whether to order Taylor to repay eight bankruptcy clients with whom he had little or no contact, and if he should recommend Taylor's suspension from practicing law in federal court.
Taylor admitted that People's Paralegal still was performing legal tasks for him, though he said he was "in the process" of ending his professional relationship with Dick Berry and company. Sharing fees with People's Paralegal, Taylor has become the lawyer of record in 488 cases since January. That has made him, volume-wise, the Valley's number one bankruptcy attorney.
The arrangement seems to have violated an Arizona Supreme Court rule against "fee splitting." The rule says "a lawyer shall not give anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services . . ."
U.S. Trustee Kalyna in July filed a complaint against Taylor with the State Bar of Arizona. It accuses him of fee-splitting and other ethical violations, which Taylor has denied.
"I certainly have to acknowledge that I found myself in a tough situation based on some information I received and some miscalculation on my part," Taylor told Judge Case of his experience with Berry. "Then there was some bad publicity and what have you. . . . Consequently, I have been struggling."
Case asked Taylor if he'd reviewed the files to determine if his inferior work on the eight cases under consideration had affected their outcomes.
Taylor replied that he'd looked at the paperwork "somewhat," but had drawn no conclusions.
"If I were in your spot," the judge replied, "I would have been up all night to determine if these clients suffered because you didn't show up [for hearings]. . . . I think it's dangerous when lawyers treat these matters as high-volume and rote."
An attorney for a large car-loan company told Case that at least one of the eight unnecessarily lost her car solely because Taylor had failed to reply to the attorney's numerous inquiries.
Case ordered Taylor to reimburse the eight clients, and to immediately write to his remaining 200-plus clients and offer them the opportunity to seek new representation. The judge also told Taylor to take on no new clients during a 60-day "probation" period.
"Clean up this mess first," the judge instructed.
Taylor asked Case for clarification on one point. Could he hire People's Paralegal employees to do "specific tasks" at his office?
Case appeared incredulous at the question, then shook his head before replying.
"I'm not going to tell you who to hire," the judge told the barrister. ". . . But contract work with someone who works for People's is not acceptable."
Last Friday afternoon in Judge Marlar's courtroom, Taylor faced another barrage of questions about his relationship with People's Paralegal.
"Is this a shell game?" the judge asked. "Are you basically a front for Mr. Berry and his group . . . [Are you] going to set up another kind of scheme? I need to know this."
"I have no intention of violating the court orders," Taylor replied.
"But you are doing it," Marlar continued. ". . . It's going to get you disbarred. [Berry's] not going to get disbarred, he's already been disbarred. . . . He's already been in jail."
After the hearing, Taylor told a reporter, "This is a real mess, isn't it? I guess I'm really going to have to struggle to pull myself out of this.