By Monica Alonzo
By Stephen Lemons
By Jason P. Woodbury
By Dulce Paloma Baltazar Pedraza
By Ray Stern
By Pete Kotz
By Monica Alonzo
By New Times
Continuing on the Path
Negative energy: I am writing to you to express a few thoughts regarding your recent article on the Sikh community ("A Path Divided," Susy Buchanan, January 10). I found it very interesting and disappointing that you missed the opportunity to educate the general public about basic tenets of the Sikh religion and what we as a whole Sikh community embrace as principles to live by. Instead, you appeared to avoid taking the higher ground and instead presented a negative and muddled picture.
Your choice was one in which it appeared the muckraking was of more importance than preventing another innocent Sikh like Balbir Singh being hurt or killed by unknowing people. It was obvious in reading your article that you spent a limited amount of time in our gurdwaras and/or at services-- or you would have directly observed more than 90 percent of attendees at Ninth Street and Oak being of Indian descent.
When the idea of an article in your publication was first presented to me, I was hopeful that this would help to relieve many people's concerns for the well-being of all Sikhs through a forum of education. I am not disputing the fact that there are two gurdwaras in Phoenix, just that your article missed the mark in serving a higher purpose by increasing awareness and tolerance.
Know that for Sikhs, September 11 brought more than the National Tragedy, but also Balbir Singh's death and the fear that by following our religion we would be targeted for ongoing mistaken identity and thus be at risk (this was completely missed in your article). My wish is that you hear my words and understand it is coming from a place of concern for my husband, my son and my larger family of Sikhs.
Har Kaur Khalsa
Mock this: Recently, your paper printed a review of the dinner-theater experience as seen through the eyes of Carey Sweet ("Value Pact," December 27). Although the review was certainly not very positive, I more than anyone understand that the product we offer isn't everyone's cup of tea and that certain elements of the value package we offer our patrons may not appeal to those of a younger generation.
In the many years of our theaters receiving reviews, I find the most appalling part of the critique was the great efforts Sweet made in degrading and making fun of our customers. Such quotes as "I'm sure the group will spasm, collapsing under the table with arms and legs pointed skyward, bellies bulging like ticks ready to pop" and "Dinner out means dressing to the nines, dusting off sequined frocks and smart suits, wide-lapeled though they may be" were downright mean-spirited and inappropriate in my opinion.
I've received my fair share of negative reviews and will take this one with a grain of salt. I certainly understand that the targeted demographic profile of your paper is far younger than my targeted audience of 55-plus, and the attitude your paper exhibits toward older generations is reflected in the overall style of this critique.
When I recently sat down with my marketing director and we finalized our $200,000 advertising budget for 2002, I was validated by this review that we should not be advertising in New Times. To borrow a quote from Sweet, "Will I ever advertise in New Times? God, no!"
William T. Prather, owner
Broadway Palm Dinner Theatre-West
Eating disorder: I seldom read your Cafe review because every time I do, it is some place in north Scottsdale. Living in west Glendale, I have no intention of driving one hour and then waiting another couple of hours to eat. But the January 10 Cafe pullquote caught my eye: "At least Sapporo takes reservations . . . ," so I was hooked in ("Pacific Rim Shot," Carey Sweet). Imagine: reservation specialists that aren't in; a faxed front and back of a credit card; and a faxed statement that you willshow up at the appointed time!
I don't know why I continued to read, but then it went on to tell us about smudged silverware with bits of someone else's rice; tables smeared with dishcloth slime; a counter littered with food debris. That's when I did quit reading.
If that's how the cool live, believe me, I'm happy to continue eating at Lily's Cafe in downtown Glendale where they don't require an affidavit to get a table. The food is pretty good, too. And by the way, Lily's gets 100 percent every time the county health department inspects.
Music City Madness
The gospel about Prince: Andrew Marcus! I am extremely upset by your biased article written about Prince and his new album The Rainbow Children (Recordings, January 10). First and foremost, I was having trouble deciding who you were more hateful toward, Prince himself or Jehovah's Witnesses. I came to the conclusion that it is both!
First, to call Prince's album gospel tells me of your ignorance toward Jehovah's Witnesses. Jehovah's Witnesses do not sing gospel, nor do they promote it! As far as Jehovah's Witnesses being austere in their observances and consider song structure to be idol worshiping, that hardly fits the image of Jehovah's Witnesses! As you can guess, I am one of Jehovah's Witnesses. You are talking out of the top of your hat if you think Jehovah's Witnesses' lives are austere. It's as bad as when I show up at people's doors with my husband, children and the latest copy of the Watch Tower and Awake magazine, and the owner of the house who I'm talking to comes out with "Jehovah's Witnesses don't have sex!" I then shock them by showing them scriptures where Adam and Eve had intercourse and show them the word "intercourse" in the Bible!