By Monica Alonzo
By Stephen Lemons
By Jason P. Woodbury
By Dulce Paloma Baltazar Pedraza
By Ray Stern
By Pete Kotz
By Monica Alonzo
By New Times
FLAGSTAFF -- A decade-long, high-stakes financial and environmental struggle that stretches from a 1,000-year-old Hopi village to Southern California electric users is rapidly coming to a head.
At stake are hundreds of high-paying jobs on the Hopi and Navajo Indian reservations in northeastern Arizona; they could be lost if the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin, Nevada, closes down at the end of 2005 -- which is becoming an increasingly likely scenario.
The economic losses are pitted against maintaining the Hopi tribe's access to ancient and sacred drinking water supplies that appear to be negatively affected by coal mining operations on Black Mesa.
It's a classic case of conservation colliding with economics.
The Mohave Generating Station could shut down unless the nation's largest coal mining company -- Peabody Energy Corporation -- can develop an alternative method of transporting coal from its Black Mesa Mine on the reservations to the Mohave Generating Station, says Steven Conroy, a spokesman for Southern California Edison, which operates the power plant.
Peabody mixes groundwater pumped from beneath the reservations with pulverized coal and injects the slurry into a 273-mile underground pipeline that connects the mine with the generating station.
The Hopi say the groundwater pumping is depleting surface water supplies and drying up traditional and sacred springs and washes that have been the center of Hopi society for more than 1,000 years. The Hopi are demanding that Peabody find another water source for its slurry line.
Meanwhile, the Navajo also are threatening to derail Peabody's future access to coal on Black Mesa. The Navajo are refusing to negotiate a new coal contract until resolution of a dispute over royalties owed the tribe under the current coal contract.
Without definitive water and coal contracts in place by the end of this year, Southern California Edison says it is very likely that the Mohave Generating Station will close at the end of 2005, delivering a powerful economic blow to the Hopi and Navajo, as well as to the Laughlin economy.
"There is a lot to be lost here if the plant does not continue to operate," Conroy says.
If the power plant closes, the Black Mesa Mine also will likely be shut down. The mine's only customer is the Mohave Generating Station.
The mine's 300 jobs generate $22 million a year in wages for Navajo and Hopi tribal members -- about $73,000 a year per job. The Navajo Tribe receives about $17 million a year in royalties, accounting for 12 percent of tribal income.
The Hopi Tribe receives about $3.7 million annually, or 25 percent of total tribal income. The royalty disparity occurs because most of the Black Mesa Mine lies on Navajo land.
Laughlin also will be hit hard, losing 355 jobs worth $20 million annually.
The tribes certainly don't want the generating station to close, nor does Peabody, which ships five million tons of low-sulfur coal from the Black Mesa Mine each year to the 1580-megawatt Mohave facility.
But Peabody and prominent Hopi leaders are locked in a showdown over Peabody's use of groundwater.
Former Hopi tribal chairman Vernon Masayesva is leading a coalition of environmental groups that is steadfastly opposing Peabody's continued pumping from a massive groundwater aquifer that lies beneath the reservation.
For the last three decades, Peabody has been pumping more than 4,000 acre-feet of water a year for its coal slurry operation from the Hopi's sole underground drinking water aquifer. Nowhere else in the United States is the sole drinking water supply of a Native American tribe used in such manner.
Masayesva and his nonprofit Black Mesa Trust have garnered support from major national environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Waterkeeper Alliance and Grand Canyon Trust, to force Peabody to find another water source for the coal slurry line.
"We want Peabody to go immediately on a water diet, with a phase out by the end of 2005," says David Beckman, a Los Angeles-based NRDC attorney.
Peabody contends its groundwater pumping has insignificant impact on water supplies contained in a vast sandstone rock formation several thousand feet underground known as the N-aquifer.
The St. Louis-based company says 11 public and private studies of the N-aquifer show that the mine's operation will use less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the water stored in the aquifer. The most recent study conducted for Peabody concluded that the aquifer will quickly recover once mining ceases -- which, if contracts are signed, could continue another 30 years.
Earlier this year, Peabody filed a request with the Department of Interior's Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement to increase the amount of water it pumps from the aquifer to 5,700 acre-feet annually. (An acre-foot is 325,851 gallons, roughly enough water to supply the needs of a family of four for one year.)
Environmentalists dismiss Peabody's aquifer studies as fraudulent.
"The truth of the matter is the Peabody model is the classic cooked-book approach to evaluating the resource," says NRDC's Beckman.
The battle over Peabody's pumping of the N-Aquifer has dragged on for years. But now, a case pending before the California Public Utilities Commission is bringing the contentious fight to what appears to be a final showdown.
Southern California Edison is required to install $1 billion worth of air pollution-control equipment on Mohave's twin generators by the end of 2005. The improvements are required by a 1999 consent decree stemming from a lawsuit filed by environmental groups; it alleged that emissions from Mohave Generating Station were fouling the air in the Grand Canyon and other Southwest national parks.