By Amy Silverman
By Olivia LaVecchia
By Monica Alonzo and Stephen Lemons
By Chris Parker
By Michael Lacey
By Weston Phippen
Hip-hopped up:I just had to write and make a point about your article "Robot Wars" (Jimmy Magahern, January 9). Breakin' isn't hip-hop. The scene isn't hip-hop, never was. Sorry, just not the case. The electronic dance music culture is where it's at now – been for a while, too. Sure, the [Furious Styles Crew's Sixth Anniversary B-Boy] Summit may have focused on and looked like hip-hop, but the majority of breakers in this world and in the U.S. are in the electronic music scene. Sure, similar peeps – and like you mentioned, how they all get along so well. Well, it's not the hip-hop scene! It's the rave scene that got it that friendly. Ever hear of PLUR?
The music isn't hip-hop, either. You are not going to find those dudes buying CDs from the hip-hop section of a music store. Nope. Dance music, yes. The dance is break-dancing, the music is BREAKS! Short for break beats, a type of music in the electronic music scene. Afrika Bambaataa and all those old names you mentioned were early risers in the electronic music scene. Check out your Detroit then Chicago house music history. Arizona isn't too up on it as in the east (Chicago, Boston, Columbus, New York, Washington, D.C.). You wanna see dancers who might not be 30-second stints or acrobatic, try checking Club Freedom.
No harm. I still dug your article. Just the dancing is notfrom or into hip-hop – it's electronic breaks!
Something to crow about: An interesting insight into the salaries here at ASU ("Raising Arizona State," Amy Silverman, January 2). I work deep in the bowels of one of the more distinguished facilities here at Crow Enterprises, Inc. – just FYI.
I think we got a 5 percent raise (or 4 percent, I forget) last year; seeing how some made 10 to 25 percent (and Crow, whose own salary increase over that he had at Columbia, I am sure, is more impressive still) makes me feel so happy. After all, it's not just any school that can bootstrap its own staff such that it can wrangle that kind of money in a deficit year and manage to try to get the office re-carpeted, while some buildings on campus can't even be used for education due to their current condition.
As the State Press said, "Live with it." Double the cost of their educations, double the students per class, shuffle the deck and let the faculty fall out – and downhill, toward greener pastures. Too many people here at the Michael Crow Institute of Technology anyway.
Name withheld by request
Budget cuts like a knife: When I read this article, my only response was, "I am appalled." I only wish there could have been some contrast to the inequities that our staff and some faculty get. I am a staff member, and my raise last year was $1,450, somewhere around 2 percent. My benefit costs increased close to 4 percent. Many staff people and some faculty are well below the midrange of their grades. I guess the administration did not feel it was important for those people to be brought up to the same standard they held for themselves. I have had to endure shrinking budgets because of cutbacks but see spending left and right for pet projects. What is wrong with this picture? That same $250,000 could have gone a long way for those people needing it the most. Makes you wonder who is looking out for the little guy.
Name withheld by request
ASU jeer leader:Thank you, thank you, thank you! This should be on the front page of every newspaper in this state.
As an ASU employee and alum, I am thoroughly disgusted over my administration's lack of ethics and concern for the faculty, staff and students they are supposed to be representing.
Name withheld by request
To hull and back: Damn, you're good. But don't you mean "Razing" Arizona State? You captured some good points, and it's something everyone here needed to hear. Although I can attest to the fact that many of the people whose salaries you mentioned do a magnificent job, it seems that others have taken note of the way ASU wants to ring in the new year: shifting the burden from the taxpayers to the students.
In an October letter to Randall Gnant and Jim Wiers, the outgoing Speaker of the House and president of the Senate, respectively, Governor Jane Hull said she didn't want to cut the university's budget more than 5 percent because she didn't want it to directly affect the students. Wake up and smell the propane, Jane! It's affecting us! Now we'll have to pay an extra $1,000 in tuition. At the same time, Hull said she was only cutting the Arizona Board of Regents' budget by 2 percent because she still wanted to make Arizona's schools appealing. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
Now our beloved Dr. Crow, ASU's so-called savior, is at the mast of this great ship bound for who knows where. This great ship, coincidentally losing its "Hull," is not receiving much support from the state. The "Changing Directions" initiative headlines its proposal by saying it wants to "increase the affordability of higher education" and "improve the quality of the educational experience." Oh, really?