By Ray Stern
By Ray Stern
By New Times
By Amy Silverman
By Stephen Lemons
By Stephen Lemons
By Monica Alonzo
By Chris Parker
There the fidgeting former governor sat, front-row of the Arizona House of Representatives, face-to-face with his accuser, new governor Janet Napolitano, as she delicately alluded in her State of the State address to the civic horrors wrought by 12 years of Fife and his followers' brand of compassionate conservatism.
So much compassion for rich campaign contributors seeking tax loopholes, so much conservatism toward funding basic public services with a state general coffer increasingly turned general sieve by Fife's revenue raiders.
Thanks for this outrageous billion-dollar deficit mess, Janet said in her annoyingly peppy euphemistic style earlier this month.
I spent her whole baritone drone watching Fife from five seats down. You quickly discover that in a hall full of Speaker Jake Flake's 500 grandchildren, the only entertainment is the Theater of the Perturbed.
Fife adjusted his sock.
Janet promised to save Arizona's water, air and forests.
Fife rubbed lint from his trousers.
Janet offered affordable prescription drugs to the elderly.
Fife picked his teeth.
Janet paused for the requisite ovation. Fife leaned forward, placed his hands between his knees and clapped limply three times like a bored baroness at the third day of a loser's-bracket cricket match.
Under that famously blond mop, though, you knew the synapses were firing frickin' laser beams. I kept praying for him to snap, for him to jump up and scream:
Ha! Just try to pay for it all, beee-aattch! HAIRBALL HULL AND I TOOK ALL THE MONEY!
But it was the gubernatorial honeymoon. Lovey, lovey between Mr. Past and Ms. Future. Fife and Co. restrained.
Now, though, the thieving wing of the Arizona Legislature is saying the honeymoon is over.
They are now saying there is no way to pay for Janet's plan not to eviscerate an already skeleton state government. More pesky regulators must be let go, more Arizonans left without critical medical aid and more kids left illiterate and unprotected from abusive parents because the state budget deficit is just too great.
Republican leaders are now revisiting their old sophistic line that the problem with Arizona's government is out-of-control spending. They point to the fact that state government is spending much more than it used to.
That's a specious argument and they know it. In fact, Arizona has grown exponentially in proportion to the moderate increases in government spending. As ASU economist Dennis Hoffman points out, in 1982, Arizona ranked 24th in the country in per capita state-government spending. Now it ranks 46th in per capita spending, about the same ranking the state gets for the quality of its schools and other state services.
Now most in the Republican-dominated Legislature whine that the public, through voter initiatives, has tied their hands by mandating increased spending for services, particularly schools.
What those public votes mean, legislators don't seem willing to admit, is that Arizonans are screaming that they would like at least a mediocre state government under which to live and raise families.
What those public votes mean is that state legislators, championed by Fife and protégée Hairball, have sent the state in the opposite direction of where the majority of Arizonans want it to go.
Arizonans speak. Fife adjusts his collar.
This is to be expected from a not-so-petty thief. What is more maddening is that Janet Napolitano, in deeds and in words, is trying to appease the thieves.
Janet proposes improving state programs while not raising state taxes for a state government that will be $1 billion short of cash even though it is one of the chintziest governments in the country.
She plans to make things okay by borrowing money, shuffling money from other state funds and using revenue bonding for construction.
This is not a bad place to start. Indeed, there is a prototype in place for this plan: The University of Arizona has balanced books for years with limited funding by shuffling pots of money, scalping the fed of grant dollars and building infrastructure using revenue bonding.
Yeah, sure, if you dig into the university's books like New Times did two years ago, you'll see all sorts of questionable, if not fraudulent, deals. But perhaps the ends justify the means. It's a great university on the cheap.
The problem: The state is in much worse financial shape than the UofA was. It has much farther to go to be good, let alone great. And it's much easier to cook university books than it is the books of a whole state.
So just come out and say it, Janet. It must be said. Show us some balls.
We must raise taxes!
The state needs more money. It's very simple. We must be willing to pay for the adequate services we demand.
First, though, Napolitano and legislators can begin by raising taxes on all the dirtbags who had their taxes slashed by the myriad outrageous tax loopholes, mostly authored by Republicans, that have stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from state coffers since Symington first took office.