The Thing That Won't Leave

The feds have busted a gut trying to deport Emmanuel Agyeman. Even seven tumultuous years in an Arizona prison couldn't budge him

In February 1997, self-styled businessman Emmanuel Agyeman boarded a bus in Carson City, Nevada.

Emmanuel Agyeman
Peter Scanlon
Emmanuel Agyeman
Barbara Levy and Emmanuel Agyeman at their wedding in 1991.
Barbara Levy and Emmanuel Agyeman at their wedding in 1991.

His destination was the central Arizona town of Eloy, which sits between Phoenix and Tucson. It was Agyeman's first visit to the Grand Canyon State, but it was hardly a vacation.

Earlier, immigration authorities had picked up the native of Ghana for overstaying his visa by several years. The bus was owned and operated by the United States government, specifically by the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Though he'd married an American citizen in 1991, Agyeman, then 42, never had completed steps to win a coveted green card. The card guarantees its holder permanent residency status.

Most important, Agyeman and his wife, Barbara Levy, had failed to show for a 1992 interview with an INS officer. He later claimed Levy had been unable to attend because she'd been hospitalized after an acute episode of mental illness.

Unmoved, the government in late 1992 had ordered Agyeman -- his visa long had expired by then -- to leave the country within 30 days.

Instead, he moved alone from New Jersey to Nevada, where he says he later started an import-export business.

Agyeman says he spoke often with Levy after leaving, but he admits he never saw her again after settling in Nevada -- where, incidentally, he had some run-ins with police, including two drunken-driving convictions and a bad-check rap.

When the government finally caught up to Agyeman, it moved him to the Eloy Detention Center for incarceration and legal processing. The 1,500-bed prison for immigrants is run by the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), a company that contracts with governmental agencies nationwide.

It seemed virtually certain that U.S. authorities would soon be shipping Agyeman back to Ghana or to England, where he'd spent much of his life as the son of a well-to-do accountant.

But the monumental deportation war known as The United States of America v. Emmanuel Senyo Agyeman has yet to be decided -- more than eight years after Agyeman's 1997 detention and more than 13 years after the feds first ordered his expulsion.

Agyeman was incarcerated for more than seven of those years, which gives him the dubious distinction of being one of the nation's longest-held detainees. Like Tom Hanks' memorable character in last year's movie The Terminal, he's been stuck in immigration hell, a bewildering world of arcane laws, regulations, policies and court rulings.

In Agyeman's case, a bevy of Stanley Tucci-like government officials (Tucci played the tightly wound Homeland Security official in The Terminal) has devoted year after year to ridding the nation -- and themselves -- of him.

But Agyeman is a far more difficult study than the likable, cheery and truly innocent Hanks character, Viktor Navorski.

To call Agyeman litigious is an understatement.

To call him a model prisoner is just wrong.

Most officials he's come into contact with consider Agyeman a pesky little gnat who just won't go away. You might say he's a biting fly.

Because of his incessant clashes with authorities, he spent much of his incarceration in solitary confinement. Then, last November, he was placed in a supervised release program.

Since first detaining Agyeman in 1997, the government has spent untold thousands of dollars and countless hours trying to deport him.

But Agyeman is still here, and probably isn't leaving any time soon.

Indeed, he seems to have found his life's purpose in battling the U.S. government and its assorted minions.

And, surprisingly, he's twice beaten them in the big-time arena known as the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Agyeman won two separate court appeals in recent years, one against the feds and the other against the CCA prison firm. Both cases were heard by the 9th Circuit Court, which is one step below the U.S. Supreme Court.

In July 2002, the court voted 2-1 to remand Agyeman's case to Immigration Court. It was five years after a judge in Eloy had ordered his deportation.

The loss was stunning for the United States, and it made Agyeman famous in immigration law circles.

Seattle corporate attorney Leonard Feldman, who worked on that case pro bono for Agyeman, wrote in a Washington State Bar Association journal, "Besides being favorable to Mr. Agyeman, the court's opinion is often cited in cases involving important due-process principles."

Sounds compelling, and it is . . . as far as it goes.

At first blush, Emmanuel Agyeman appears to be a terribly sympathetic character whose life has been engulfed and ruined by the vagaries of immigration law.

For unlike most of his fellow prisoners, he originally wasn't even charged with a deportable criminal offense such as selling drugs, burglary or committing a violent crime.

Officially, Agyeman just overstayed his visa.

But definitive statements about Agyeman are not well-advised. His autobiography turns out to be shrouded in mystery, half-truths and outright lies.

In fact, because government lawyers failed to do their homework, one pivotal lie would serve Agyeman very well in his mercurial deportation case.

From the start of that case in 1997, he claimed he'd married Barbara Levy for love, not just for a green card as the spouse of a U.S. citizen.

Agyeman also testified that he still was married to her.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next Page >>
 
  • Woliki 07/31/2010 9:50:00 AM

    Dear Paul Rubin, Sorry to tell you that your article about Emnl Senyo Agyeman is appalling because you don't know this guy very well but that wouldn't stop us loving and respecting him. 1. Emnl was a very successful businessman in Europe and also owned a nice property over there long before coming in the USA. He also came from a very comfortable familly. This "THING" as you called him didn't come to USA to either claim any benefits or work a "sweeper". He was a self-styled businessman in your country as well. 2. You didn't know exactly what went wrong between him and his wife... 3. What have you gained in displaying his picture in this your article? You only expressed a racist feeling towards him. Any efforts you made to destroy his good reputation in your article has brought so many opportunities on his way : This "thing" has now recovered from his past mistake and ordeal; he has now set up an another Import-Export company in his country...He is now enjoying a peaceful life with family's members and friends.... Your expectations to destroy him were completely unrealistic! Please try and learn to use your skills more creatively. Let's know what do you expect from this article so confusion will disappear and things will drop nicely into place. We look forward to hearing from you Your sincerely Wlm

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy