By Lauren Wise
By New Times
By Amanda Savage
By Jason P. Woodbury
By Troy Farah
By New Times
By Derek Askey
The increasingly combative File-Sharing Wars have come to this: Record companies now assume you may have criminal intent whether you buy CDs honestly or not. Recent releases from the Foo Fighters, My Morning Jacket, Velvet Revolver, and the Backstreet Boys have placed new, unexpected limitations on your ability to rip, store, copy and burn music from legally acquired CDs. Essentially, these discs now insist on installing software onto your computer and limiting the number of copies you can burn, while also complicating the process of loading audio tracks onto some portable music players, including the iPod. Fans of legitimate download sites like iTunes have swallowed such limitations without much complaint, but CDs might be a tougher sell.
While lawsuits against Internet file-sharing outposts like Grokster (and a few shots at individual Napster users) have grabbed headlines, major record labels have quietly shifted their target to casual CD copying between friends and family members. This, they now claim, is the real scourge behind the industry's prolonged slump. In contrast to pay-for-play download sites, physical CDs have always been wide open, and consumers now expect that they can play the discs in standard CD players, rip the audio files to their computers for desk-side listening, download the tracks into a portable music player, burn a compilation of favorite tunes, and make a physical backup copy for safe keeping, all easily and cheaply.
It's that last point that unnerves the industry: With a simple CD-R drive and a pack of blank discs, consumers can physically replicate CDs for about 10 cents apiece.
Thus, the changes and limitations imposed by this new software, which record labels freely admit are more akin to speed bumps than padlocks: They won't completely halt ripping, burning, copying and file-sharing, but they certainly complicate and frustrate the process, even when the CD owner's motives are pure and the ends legal. The ironic result is that record companies treat their customers -- those who've chosen not to acquire music via illegal but easily accessible file-sharing sites -- as potential criminals.
The New Order
When you pop the new Backstreet Boys disc Never Gone into a standard Windows-based computer, a pop-up dialogue box greets you to demand that you install special software before you can play the CD or rip it to your hard drive. The software acts as the digital rights manager, limiting the manner in which you can rip the CD and controlling the number of copies you can burn. If you don't agree to install the software, your computer ejects the disc unplayed and unripped.
Should you configure your computer to disable the "autorun" parameter, the software installer will also be disabled, which seems to solve the problem. Unfortunately, the CD's songs will now fail to register in standard media players like Windows Media Player or iTunes. Put simply, you can hear the music on the label's terms, using the label's designated media player, or not hear it at all.
The designated player's rights-management solutions are based on a concept called "sterile burning," designed to limit copying activity to that deemed reasonable by the record label. Only a limited number of copies (typically three) can be made, and those "sterile" copies are reproductive dead-ends, unable to be reimported or copied. By year's end, Sony hopes that 100 percent of its new releases will carry this technology. But there are further, more troubling issues of particular frustration to iPod owners. The current crop of managed discs only allows Windows users to rip audio tracks into a specific format, Microsoft WMA, which the world's dominant portable media player does not "speak." An iPod expects tunes to be downloaded in either Apple's AAC format or the more generic MP3. But labels have thus far insisted on WMA files for their discs, leaving consumers without a simple path for porting music to their iPods.
So what are Windows-running, CD-buying, iPod-toting consumers to do? Faced with complaints, Sony has provided two solutions:
1. Directions on how to burn the protected tracks to a blank disc and then rip those songs into iTunes as MP3s.
2. Directions on where to send a request to Apple to demand it change its rights-management system to better suit Sony's needs.
The first proposal requires users of the dominant operating system and portable music player to insert the purchased CD, install software, buy a blank disc, burn the tracks on it, reinsert that CD, and rip those tracks, all to copy legally acquired music to their iPods. Worse, these file conversions include two steps of audio degradation into compressed or "lossy" formats, potentially affecting sound quality.
The second proposal conscripts music buyers as lobbyists in Sony's business issue with Apple.
Even consumers with WMA-compatible portable players (such as models from iRiver, Creative, or Sanyo) -- or listeners simply wishing to play the CD on their computers -- may still blanch at the demands of these new discs, which require you to agree to a complex user license agreement and allow a record company to install software on your computer. And if a label won't trust you to use a legally purchased CD legally, why should you trust it to install that CD's software on your computer?