Our Community Under Siege

Where do we turn when law enforcement threatens citizens like a grim force of nature?

Newspaper readers are not mobsters.

How in the hell did freedom of the press and the First Amendment become such fragile doctrines?

The staff of this newspaper determined it must examine the sad logic of the outrageous subpoenas.

The month before my arrest, I happened to visit Dachau, a very short drive for the residents of Munich, Germany. The second floor of a nearby housing development looks out upon the assembly field of the infamous camp. A McDonald's, with its happy meals, is but a few hundred yards from Dachau's gate.

Dachau evolved into a concentration camp, but in the beginning it was merely a resettlement station for communists and other political malcontents; in fact, this effort to maintain order in fractious Germany was considered so banal that the New York Times covered the opening of Dachau. The Red Cross gave it passing marks.

It was in Dachau that I found the memory of poet and pastor Martin Niemoller. He survived the concentration camp, and his words written after the war survived him.

If you don't recall his name, you will recognize his work.

When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent;

I was not a communist.

Then they came for the sick, the so-called incurables, and I didn't speak up,

Because I wasn't mentally ill.

Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up.

Because I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.

Niemoller's elegant critique was on my mind again after I walked out of jail and met with the writers and editors of New Times.

I suggested that what appeared to be a stunningly arrogant subpoena aimed at our readers was not simply a high-risk tactic that suddenly turned the Constitution on its ear; this challenge of the First Amendment evolved gradually after years of abusing the rights of others.

Our series of articles undertook the prosaic: Let's look at those others.

And so we examined the County Attorney and the Sheriff's assault upon the rights of prisoners, political opponents, journalists, migrants and judges. The hostilities took shape over 14 years. They did not begin with judges, but by the time Thomas, Arpaio and Wilenchik arrived at the courthouse with their dark accusations in October, who but the jurists was shocked? When law enforcement subsequently stumbled upon readers as a target of secret writs, the authorities had little reason to reflect.

And please, despite acknowledging Niemoller, do not for a second think that I am making some puerile, dorm-room allusion to the horrors of fascism. I am not. But the pastor's insight into our bond with society's others is apt.

Others. Such a simple thought for writers; it is not so simple for the community.

Who are the others; must we deal with all of the others?

The isolation of others in Phoenix began with prisoners in Arpaio's jails. He built unprecedented political popularity promising to treat them harshly.

Clearly the community has spoken, repeatedly: What do these inmates have to do with us?

Even Niemoller's work, with all that informed it, generated unsettling questions about who was, or was not, part of the community. In some versions of his poem, the mentally ill are left out as a class in favor of social democrats. There are charming reports that, during the McCarthy era, the communists were dropped from the poem when Niemoller was invoked.

Those of you scanning these words will decide who are members of the community. But it is plain: what began with the sheriff's inmates ended with this newspaper's readers.

For two years, I spent not enough Sundays on a pew inside Sacred Heart church in Galveston, Texas. In 1900, this Gulf Coast community was all but wiped off the map by a hurricane that killed about 8,000 men, women and children. The 16-foot storm surge and 140 mile-per-hour winds flattened everything in their path; it stands today as the deadliest natural disaster in the history of America.

At the end of every mass at Sacred Heart, the congregation prayed, without embarrassment, to the Virgin Mary to spare them from such torment ever again.

In a secular world, such an invocation is almost quaint.

Today, we rely not upon divine intercession but rather upon government for protection. (And the practical citizens of Galveston, not trusting entirely in Catholic supplication, demanded that City Hall rebuild with the protection of a stout sea wall).

But where do we turn when government — in this case, law enforcement — threatens its citizens like a grim force of nature?

Of course, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights offer refuge, but the reality is that they are Olympian ideals that grow suddenly distant when most needed. Arizona's prisoners' rights lawsuit, Hart vs. Hill, is 30 years in the courts with no resolution is sight. This paper's brief act of defiance cost us a quarter of a million dollars in legal fees, hardly a viable option for most. The federal government failed to pass laws that address the very real problems associated with illegal aliens. A vacuum ensued. Race-baiters, Thomas and Arpaio, filled the void and cater now to an angry mob, despite the fact that migrants enjoy the same Constitutional rights as the rest of us.

« Previous Page
Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help

to citizen of phx , I myself am glad this Phoenix New Times prints the truth and informs citizens and keeps an eye out for the lawbreakers.Why wouldnt Arpaio and Thomas turn them selves in? as you sugggest for others . I am glad they are standing up and questioning them Why would a sheriff dept and prosecuting office care if they were doing things on the up and up???what position were you promised for your letter?


Why is it Mr. Lacey that you mention that the Sheriff's Office, the County Attorney, and Dennis W. broke the law or violated the Grand Jury statute, but you don't quote any statute? Perhaps it's because they did no such thing. That subpoena may have been overbroad, but you had a remedy. You could have shown up on the court date listed and explained your side of the story. No laws were actually broken. In fact, Sheriff Joe, Andy Thomas, and Dennis W. have never committed any crime and you know it. But, someone did commit a crime in this whole fiasco and you know who it is. It was you and your partner in crime. You blatantly broke the law. You were given an opportunity to do things the right way and you chose to break a law and then you cry when you were arrested. Why don't you demand to have yourself prosecuted? That would be the right thing to do. How on earth can you continue to call this a newspaper? You don't honestly report any news. You have no regard for the truth. The first ammendment does not provide you any right to spread lies. This rag is no better than the National Enquirer. Maybe it's worse, at least the Enquirer will admit to being a tabloid.


Sheriff Joe Arpaio was there in his glory this morning at the installation of the Phoenix Mayor and new and re-elected City council members. I noted that he now has his employee on the council: Thelda Williams. She gave her due to the Sheriff in her speech.


It's all very frightening. What is also scary is that so many are so blind and still support Arpaio. It is simply astonishing!

I applaud New Times for exposing the sadist for what he is. I'm sure it is true or Joe would sue your sox off. Since the Republic does not see the problem with his many violations (shame on them!), I'm very happy to have a source of information. I've had first-hand experience with his inmates so I know how cruel he really is. But the public has no way of knowing how he runs his jails or abuses his authority in other ways. Thank you!


The closest McDonald's is more than a mile from Dachau. Dachau did not "evolve" into a concentration camp. It was called a "concentration camp" during a press conference on the day before it opened. The Red Cross gave Auschwitz passing marks, as well as Dachau. The Reverend Martin Niemoeller was put on trial for treason and convicted. He was sentenced to time served and was then sent to Dachau as "an enemy of the state," because he refused to stop breaking the law. He did not mention the sick or the mentally ill in his famous quote.

Jim Cozzolino
Jim Cozzolino

Well said Michael. Keep up the good fight. Many, many of us are standing right beside you, and will be all the way to the end.See you soon.

MaryK Croft
MaryK Croft

"People must resist."

We're resisting as fast as we can. Arpaio is correctly shown as a tip of the iceberg, only the visible representative of what all is wrong. For the tip of yet another iceberg, simply look up on a day when there are streaks of funny-looking clouds across the sky, clouds that really don't go away, but are joined by other clouds in both parallel and perpendicular lines. Then Google the word "chemtrails" and find out what you, the individual, can do about it. Look for my name, and my brother Don, and see that there are indeed activist resistors.

We're doing it.

Phoenix Concert Tickets