Guess which driver's facing 21 years in prison — the drunk , rich, white one or the sober, poor, black one?

Two cars collided last year on Cinco de Mayo.

Bryant Wilkerson's life changed when he collided with a drunk driver.
Andy Hartmark
Bryant Wilkerson's life changed when he collided with a drunk driver.

Considering the date, you might assume that at least one of the drivers was drunk — and you'd be right. Laura Varker was 17 years old, and she'd been tubing down the Salt River all day with her eight best girlfriends. Their T-shirts all read "Cinco de Drinko." Even an hour after the accident, Varker's blood-alcohol level was 0.09, over the legal limit for adults. And, as an underage driver, she was in violation of the law by having any amount of alcohol in her system.

One of Varker's girlfriends, 15-year-old Felicia Edwards, didn't drink a drop. But it was Edwards who died when Varker's Yukon Denali hit another car and flipped over and over like a tumbleweed before coming to a horrifying stop on the Bush Highway north of Mesa. Edwards was thrown from the SUV and pronounced dead at the scene.

When sheriff's deputies called Felicia's mother that terrible day, her first question was, "Was she wearing a seat belt?" She wasn't. Instead, Felicia had been in the back of the SUV holding down the tubes — a decision she paid for with her life.

That's a tragedy.

But only in its aftermath did the collision become a travesty. That's because, even after blood tests showed that Varker was legally drunk, and even after sheriff's investigators learned that it was she and another girl who'd flashed a fake ID and bought Coors Light and malt liquor for the group, Varker hasn't been charged with anything.

Not underage consumption.

Not drunken driving.

And certainly not manslaughter.

Instead of charging the affluent white girl, the sheriff's officers arrested the other driver, a black man, a guy who wasn't even legally drunk.

Bryant Wilkerson was a 28-year-old postal service clerk with nothing on his record worse than a fender-bender. That day, he was merely making a U-turn, in a place where U-turns are permitted, when a 17-year-old party girl in her daddy's SUV tried to speed around him.

Wilkerson's life has been upended. He's been charged with nine felony counts, including manslaughter and aggravated assault. He spent three months in jail because he didn't have the money to post bail, and he lost his job because of that. Now under strict curfew and random alcohol and drug screenings for the past five months, he has to get permission from the court just to attend his daughter's band concerts in the evening.

He's facing 21 years in prison.

Meanwhile, Laura Varker is posing on her MySpace page in a bikini.


That day on the Bush Highway, Bryant Wilkerson did one thing wrong. Admittedly, it was really wrong.

He was making a U-turn — which, again, was legal — when he saw Varker's Denali come out of nowhere on his left side. According to the sheriff's report, witnesses suggest Varker saw his little Hyundai slowing and crossed over the yellow lines into the center lane to pass him. At least one witness, a friend of Varker's who was just behind her on the highway, told deputies that the other car was slowing too dramatically for her to stop; Varker had to lurch into the center lane just to avoid rear-ending him.

(Now, you'd think Varker would allow plenty of distance between herself and other drivers. Just seven months earlier, as a 16-year-old with a brand-new license, Varker had caused another accident. Police records say she failed to stop in time and slammed into another car on Cactus Road, which then hit the car in front of it.)

But back to Cinco de Mayo. As he went into the turn, Wilkerson didn't see the SUV veering into the center lane until it was too late.

Amazingly, Wilkerson's Hyundai was just fine, other than losing its bumper. It grazed the SUV and hung on to finish the U-turn.

In their rear-view window, though, Wilkerson's passengers were horrified to see the Denali flipping over and over, according to the sheriff's report.

And that's when, Wilkerson admits, he made a really big mistake. He panicked and took off.

"I freaked out," he says. "That's no excuse; that's so not me. But I had the people in my car yelling, 'Go, go, go!' and I just freaked out and panicked." Sheriff's deputies caught up with him just 10 minutes later.

Because he fled the scene, it's understandable that the sheriff's deputies assumed that Wilkerson had something to hide. Their reports note that he smelled heavily of alcohol, that he'd admitted to smoking pot that morning, that he seemed drunk.

The problem is, all the tests came back well under the legal limit. Wilkerson blew a 0.049 on the sheriff's Breathalyzer. By the time the sheriff's officers did a blood test, which is widely considered much more accurate, Wilkerson's blood-alcohol content was only 0.01. The presence of marijuana was just as minimal. Wilkerson had only trace amounts in his bloodstream.

Never mind. The sheriff's deputies had made up their minds: Wilkerson was to blame for the crash. They arrested him, charging him with manslaughter, aggravated assault, leaving the scene of a fatal injury accident, unlawful flight from law enforcement, and five counts of endangerment. (A sheriff's spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.)

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • 11/06/2011 11:20:00 PM

    the problem is that racism is alive and well in Arizona and everywhere else. "driving while black" is still a crime in some areas. Apparently Phoenix and it's wasteland is one of those places. I still don't really understand what happened in the accident other then a drunk girl ran into a car and rolled her truck and killed a passenger that was un-restrained. how is it the other guy's fault? He shouldn't have left the scene but that doesn't make him guilty of any other crimes other then that.

  • TheBestRedDress 12/20/2010 5:43:00 PM

    This is so sad. I hope that she faces true justice, and that he is dealt with in a kind and human fashion. As for those whining about "racial divide" blah, blah, blah. It would be a lot easier to ignore if it didn't happen so much, but of course you can ignore it and sweep it under the rug. Please. People like you are useless to this country's healing because you deny that our problems exists.

  • imkander 11/07/2010 9:15:00 AM

    imkander

  • imkander 11/07/2010 9:12:00 AM

    İmkander

  • düzce iş 11/05/2010 12:41:00 PM

    Too bad those times are gone.

  • Nicearticledipsht 07/16/2010 7:08:00 PM

    It would be easier to take your article seriously if you didn't play up the racial dividing lines or write like a kid on myspace. I suggest you go back to school for some lessons in journalism and maybe a class on how not to manage to make people want to disagree with you even when your point is incredibly valid.

  • Dave 05/14/2010 3:29:00 AM

    Yes that was unfortunate but UI am sick of all that look at whitey get away with everything while the poor struggling black man has to pay crap....BULLSHIT! How about this- Every weekend down here all these ppl ride their malnourished and neglected horses on state highways with no shoulders at dark after the "trailrides" and if anyone would hit them guess what? They wanna sue and if the poor driver of the vehicle happened to maybe even have 1 beer or a glass of wine with dinner guess who is going to prison? Just the other day One of these stupid so called weekend cowboy trailride riders had a horse running in the highway that was struck by a vehicle causing it to flip over onto my car totaling it and did they claim responsibitily? Ofcoarse not but they are liable for the damage and I GOT SCREWED. Now as a white man if it where my horse that did the damage guess what? I would be getting sued for whatever I worked for and yes, I would own up to my responsibiltiy so don't give me that inequality bullshit. It is people like you that continue to stir the hatred and by the way- guess what color the owner of the horse was? So kiss my ass with this poor stuggling black man shit vs the rich white people because if you have money no matter what color you do get away with alot- Just look at O.J. Simpson

  • jesus 05/10/2010 2:44:00 AM

    Who are the parents of this irresponsible child?? Are they an affluent member of society?? This kid needs to be responsible for her actions!! And I don't get Law Enforcement. What kind of training do they receive? If any training at all! Is there any third party review in that state that oversee's these mistakes of justice?? An why didn't the Sheriff's Dept. respond to any media requests?? Something to Hide?? Mistakes maybe?

  • wow 05/09/2010 8:53:00 PM

    um....Bebe. You're kinda stupid. You're sitting there arguing that "It was Cinco de Mayo", and "what teenager do you know that doesnt like to party".....THAT DOESNT CHANGE THE LAW DUMB ASS!!! That just shows how immature and self centered you are. Your girl was drunk...he was NOT. Your girl is UNDERAGED, he was not. Numbers are numbers and cant be argued with. His tests came back UNDER THE LIMIT...not "krunk" as that Tim person so eloquently put it(rolls eyes) Leaving the scene? Yeah, bad move on his part. But to sit there and try to justify your drunk, underaged friends reckless (and apparently repetitive) behavior (because you're teenagers that like to have fun, wheee!)is deplorable. Whether you're white, black, green or purple. Grow up dummy.

  • Adam 03/04/2010 3:30:00 PM

    Injustice at its finest. If anyone in a position of power had a shred of fairness they would feel the same as any one of us. Too bad those times are gone. He's screwed.

  • amanda 12/07/2009 2:07:00 PM

    the one drunk shad have payed too my uncle was killed in adrunk drive too the guy that killed him got noting

  • amanda 12/07/2009 2:07:00 PM

    the one drunk shad have payed too my uncle was killed in adrunk drive too the guy that killed him got noting

  • David E. Smith Jr. 06/25/2009 1:21:00 AM

    This story does'nt surprise me. If you are indigent ,in Maricopa County , I strongly urge you to plea not-guilty - no matter what the court appointed attorney tells you. There is absolutely no compassion , for truth , in the Maricopa County Superior Courts , and you are much better off trusting the average citizen - to uphold our sacred doctrines. The new legislated gun-law ,that allows 21 year olds to brandish firearms , is another law enforcement tool - that with the combination of alcohol will surely complicate police encounters. The alarming deadly force encounters are escalating , in Maricopa County , and for good reason. When you have a County Health System , which cannot meet the needs of the general public the crime rate skyrockets. The State of Arizona is now ,in the mental health business , and the DOC has become the warehouse for the mentally challenged and drug addicted citizenry. The policy of sending swat-teams to answer possible suicide calls is another problem. You would think that Maricopa County could afford a first-response Psycology team to prevent these potentially deadly encounters. I'm seriously beginning to think that legislators throw a keg-party - before they vote on life-changing criminal statutes.

  • Jen 06/14/2009 3:30:00 AM

    This is a very tragic story. I personally know Bryant. Byant and his family are wonderful people. Very caring and helpful. They have done much for others. I was very sad to hear that this happend. Hopefully Bryant will be granted a fair trial.

  • ME 05/05/2009 6:18:00 AM

    When will she get justice??? Wtf is going on with Laura? It's been TWO years! Has she been charged yet?? This girl needs to be punished. It might have been a mistake, but it was a huge one, one that cost Felicia her life. For all we know, Laura is still out there partying it up, not giving a 2nd thought to what she did. I'd have a little more sympathy for her if this huge tragedy changed her. She hasn't grown up at all...this is all so horrible. Nothing will bring felicia back but I hope the law catches up with Laura "Diamond" Varker. R.I.P. Felicia Marie Edwards 5-5-07

  • Whatever 04/07/2009 7:27:00 PM

    Well Bebe, looks like all your stupid ass comments have caught up with you, he was found NOT Guilty. So take that you dumb ass kid. He was not drunk nor high, but little rich bitch had a BA of.09. Wow I wonder who killed the poor 15 year old? Varker is still getting in trouble with the law. It's only a matter of time before she kills again. Lets all hope that the person she kills is herself.

  • i was there 07/25/2008 2:34:00 AM

    Justice- No she absolutely did not. You obviously have not read the police report and aren't capable of posting something you seem to think is FACT, because it's all in the report, that her friend bought it, she did. Thats accusement of a crime not committed. So yeah say Im sticking up for her or whatever, but it's hilarous that everyone believes this rediculous story.. anyone with sense can tell there is something fishy about it. They didn't throw an innocent black man in prison for nothing "sweetie." Since you know so much about this case why dont you attend his trial and see the truth about his charges yourself... Im sure the bitch that wrote this knows when it is.

  • Just Justice 07/15/2008 4:19:00 PM

    Hey Little Miss "I Was There" - if you WERE there, then you'd know that Laura did indeed purchase alcohol with a fake ID. There is NO disputing that part of the day.

  • i was there 06/07/2008 9:19:00 PM

    Bebe and Timmy are the only two who know what they're talking about. This article was written for one purpose and one purpose only. that purpose was not to inform the public of what goes on in the world, it was only to pursuade the public into believing a one sided article in hopes of bettering a guilty mans chances in court due to the amount of publicity it stirrs up. As you can see, it surely accomplished that. However the truth is far from what this article provides for you. Sarah Fenske, the author, interviewed Bryant Wilkerson. His statements are her only source. He will obviously do and say whatever he can to make himself sound innocent. Yes, I was there, and I do know Laura Varker. However I am an honest person, and I wouldn't cover up for anyone in this situation, becuase a close friend of mine lost her life. I just believe if someones name is going to be slandered being only 17, it's probably a horrifically painful experience to read through this knowing it's not all true. Laura did NOT purchase alcohol with a fake id, nor was she drunk. Every officer and emt on scene suspected no indication of intoxication. If the other side of the story came out it would look something like this; Wilkerson first of all does not look like that picture, a video of the chase he led arresting officers in shows him to have dread locks to his waste... we all know what that means. Wilkerson ..a wife and kids? please he was at the river with his 20 year old girlfriend whom he purchased alcohol for and 5 other women. Wilkerson doesnt drive anymore because he doesnt want to take a risk of getting into another accident cuz you "just never know?" wow really? Wilkerson doesnt have insurance just like he didnt when the accident happened. Since when should anyone be embarrassed for having money? Varkers family obeyed the law by having valid vehilcular insurance. Wilkerson just broke another law. Wilkersons blood was taken exactly four hours and 52 minutes after he was taken into custody, NOT ON THE SCENE. Wilkerson was under the influence of alcohol, marajuana, and several central nervous system depressants. So the only information you (sarah fenske) informed the public with was that he fled the scene.. Varkers family could actually sue the new times for defamation due to the harassment of this girls name and false statements printed in a public newspaper. Anyway, i hope everyone gets to read this. i think this was a true accident and a horrible tragedy. I just believe all facts should be printed IF ANY

  • Timmy 05/20/2008 5:39:00 AM

    you mother fucker , Felicia was my best friend , for you to be so biased you racist piece of shit , he was KRUNK he was high he was drunk he murdered an innocent 15 year old girl and left the scene. how can you possibly defend that. Now if his dumbass wasnt high and drunk maybe he wouldnt have gotten lost and had to do a u-turn in the middle of a highway. so you think your some creative writer huh? why dont you email me at timnchs@gmail.com or meet me up somewhere to debate this . RIP FELICIA MARIE EDWARDS

  • Bebe Felicia's Bestfriend 05/05/2008 8:13:00 PM

    All I have to say is that this article right here is nowhere near professional. It seems to me that the writer was angry for some reason & just put her opinions down a peice of paper and published it. I mean just read the title..BULLSHIT. If Laura was SO fucked up than how did she even have the strength to function? And if 'he' WASNT so fucked up than why didnt he handle the situation like the adult he is? Aint nobody covering up for anybody. It's just the fact that even if someone does tell the truth it's gonna get twisted anyways just like the fucked up world we call home. People dont think about what the fuck is going to happen next but instead think about drama, drama & drama. Drama dont make the world go 'round, life does. Stop the nonsense, have commonsense & be real. that's all I gotta say. Rest In Peace Felicia Marie Edwards 100291-050507 Love & Miss you bestfriend.

  • Bebe Felicia's Bestfriend 05/05/2008 7:16:00 PM

    Who ever wrote this had no right to have any kind of word in this case because of the fact that "whom" wasnt there in the first place. Anyone that has anything to say about this can email me. I AM Felicia's bestfriend and I AM a honest person. This article is obviously just a one track way to nonsense; not making any sense of the REAL WORLD. Who doesnt know a teenager that likes to have fun and party? Who doesnt know a teenager that hasnt tried a drink? IT WAS CINCO DE MAYO FOR GOD'S SAKE. EXACTLY my point. Evidently whoever wrote this is just trying to make a false statement on a INNOCENT & just trying to make some kinda of profit off of talking straight BULLSHIT. Laura is a close friend of mine & I know for a fact if she was too damn drunk to operate a vehicle she wouldnt have thought about it; obviously she was fine. IF she was so damn drunk why didnt she just ask one of her 12 friends so drive? EXACTLY my point again, she might of had a drink or two only GOD knows why a drugged up man would stop in the middle of a bridge, make a illegal u-turn [also without a warning like a turn signal AT LEAST], have people run from his vehicle and run AFTER, KNOWING THAT WHAT JUST HAPPENED WAS WRONG. Pointblank. If you really want to know why Felicia was in the vehicle in the first place was because she started her menstrual cycle that day and she needed a tampon to stop her from bleeding. That was why she was in the backseat not just to hold some tube but also to look for a simple tampon. WHO KNEW that a fun, happy, care-free day was going to turn out a complete disaster. So I suggest who ever wrote this article should think twice & realize some things. Anyone with commonsense would know that this is straight bullshit. -Bebe. The Bestfriend.

  • George 03/31/2008 8:56:00 PM

    What a crock of poop! Another man, although he fled, a victim of driving while Black. And this statement comes froma White Irish man. No justice for the good. No charges for the teen girl who bought beer with fake ID. The Mother of the dead teen should sue the store who sold the teen the alcohol. Sue them to kingdom come!

  • ME 03/18/2008 3:06:00 PM

    Yeaa anyways. I'm not trying to play at anything. I'm telling it like it is. And I will be the 1st to say me and felicia weren't best friends but we were friends so fuck you.

  • -- 03/11/2008 3:19:00 PM

    to whoever "ME" is -- you dont know shit about the accident like everyone else on here, so you can quit playing "im felicias best friend feel sorry for me..." its pathetic

  • K 03/08/2008 12:52:00 PM

    You can clearly see who is a part of Varker's 'party'...family/friends...they're all the ones saying she's not to blame at all. Give me a break. You get NO brownie points for teaching your drunk underage daughter/friend that it's OK to do what she did. Guess what? It completely matters that she was drunk -- her reaction time just PLUMMETED with her ILLEGAL activities that day (and how UNCONSCIONABLE to decide to drive and put all of those OTHER lives at risk, too). You STOP when there's a car in front of you -- and you drive slowly enough, and in control enough, to be ABLE to stop for sudden changes in the flow of traffic. Do you not get that? Oh no, she's your friend/family member, she can do NO WRONG. Tell that to the girl who died. Heh. Varker is at LEAST as culpable -- really MORE so than the other driver (though they both hold some serious blame, but running from the scene of an accident, however STUPID and UNCONSCIONABLE in its own right to do such a thing, does NOT lessen VARKER's role in this, but you sure do seize on it, don't you? Because that's all you've got!) You (the parents, the friends of Varker) should own up to this unless you really want to set your precious drunken underage fake-ID'd delinquent daughter/friend on her way to being a hag alcoholic with all manner of venereal disease before she's 25! Oh, but I bet you'll buy her way out of that, too, now won't you? You'll no doubt try, at least...

  • ME 03/02/2008 5:09:00 AM

    CORRECTION: She was my friend on myspace until I deleted her when I found out she was the drunk one.

  • ME 03/02/2008 4:36:00 AM

    Felicia was my friend. The day I found out she died, I couldn't believe it...I had just talked to her the day before. I even told her not to go the lake because it was dangerous [[she wasn't planning on telling her mom]]. That week went by so fast. We had gone over to a friend's house to figure out what we were going to do to help out Felicia's family. That was the first day I met Diamond AKA Laura. She seemed nice enough i guess. She literally had nothing on her but a scratch. Then she went on to explain what happened in the accident. I couldn't believe it. She was playing the victim. She KILLED Felicia! This article said Laura Varker was with her 8 best girlfriends. ***BULL! Felicia knew ONE person that day. She met Diamond & everybody else THAT day. I know for a fact that "Laura's friend" is covering for her. Her "friend" used to be my friend. And fukk her for saying she was Felicia's best friend. Felicia's best friend wouldn't sit there and cover the truth to protect her other so called murderer friend. Yes, the guy shouldn't have fled the scene. He should be charged with something but 21 years? ***Laura was the one drunk. And by the way I heard she had gotten into TWO car accidents before this one. So for anyone to say Diamond isn't responsible is stupid. Laura's irresponsible ass should go to jail. It shouldn't matter how rich she is. I don't understand why she hasn't gotten charged with anything. I mean what the fukk? Meanwhile Diamond is my friend on myspace. She hasn't changed. She's still out partying, drinking, driving, drunk-driving, etc. She shows no remorse whatsoever and this was supposed to be her friend she killed?? ***She killed a perfect stranger and she's still out doing what she does. I hope justice gets served. My prayers are with Felicia's family.

  • Jason 02/29/2008 11:33:00 AM

    I find it strange that none of her friends are talking about it and told the girl's parents about it. I smell coverup. Can you say coverup? Sure I knew you could. This guy, minding his own business, trying to make a turn gets clipped by someone obivously driving too fast and he gets charged? Not only that, but she's underage and over the legal limit? What the fuck?! How's this for a apology, "I'm sorry you were drunk and hit my car while you were speeding and rolled your car causing the death of one of your friends." Sorry, that just doesn't sound right to me. This girl MUST BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR HER ACTIONS. Screw the lawyers. If the parents are only concerned about making any problem go away, maybe they shouldn't be parents anymore. As a result of this incident, I am hereby calling for a boycott of Dial products till this is resolved.

  • dianna 02/27/2008 12:38:00 AM

    So nice to know everything is blamed on whites very one sided I believe you need to start writing things without refering to color or this is also prjudice I think its time we start speaking up for whites.

  • whatever 02/25/2008 3:39:00 PM

    AND not only was she drunk, but someone died because of her irresponsible actions...just because he is 28 does not mean that the whole thing is his fault. she was driving the car that killed an innocent person. how dense do you have to be?

  • whatever 02/25/2008 3:05:00 PM

    anonymous, you are serverely uninformed. please refer to my previous comment: by the way...according to the driving manual, leaving the scene of the crash involving death means your driving privilege is revoked for five years... http://www.azdot.gov/mvd/documents/CustomerServiceGuide_99-0117.pdf not that you go to jail for 21 years. and additionally, the penalties added together STILL do not equal 21 years if you are under the influence. and a DUI IS a VERY serious offense. are you kidding me?!

  • Kehkoh Jones 02/24/2008 6:50:00 AM

    Here's a really stupid statement: "Varker's lawyers have also hired a retired Phoenix cop, who surveyed the scene and concluded that Wilkerson erred when he slowed down to make the U-turn." Firstly, the attorney will say anything (why are attorneys called professional liars???) to get their clients off. Secondly, that hired ex-cop is being paid to say anything that will shift blame away from the client's daughter. Question: HOW in the world does one make a "U" turn without slowing down? Eh... uhm... ahh... ahem... Hellooo? "Scotty, beam me up... there's NO sign of intelligent life form down here!"

  • Kehkoh Jones 02/24/2008 6:31:00 AM

    I seem to be missing something... perhaps where this accident occurred, it's illegal for someone to leave the scene of a fatal accident EVEN IF ONE IS NOT DIRECTLY INVOLVED as it is indicated here, and I can understand the law being in place to help police piece together the events that took place and have witnesses testify afterward in an inquest or trial. That makes sense IF THAT IS THE LAW, however, where does it indicate that the man was "responsible" for causing this accident by leaving? And where in the law does it say if the one speeding, the one who was obviously legally drunk, and was the one that actually caused the accident, was coming from behind Mr. Wilkerson should NOT have been charged with involuntary manslaughter, vehicular homicide, DUI, etc? OK, the first thing I always hear Caucasians say is, "Let's not make this into a race issue" whenever the person wrongly accused or wrongly incarcerated is a non-Caucasian and the other parties involved are Caucasians. OK, let's leave the ethnic/racial issue out of this; what else can we attribute this blatant miscarriage of justice to? The one responsible for this fatal accident was speeding and unable to stop because of the speed of the vehicle AND her reflexes were impaired by alcohol consumption according to the Breathalyzer Test taken about AN HOUR LATER (up to this point, I don't see where Mr. Wilkerson is to blame for anything); she careened into the other vehicle and caused the death and injuries of the passengers of the other vehicle... (WHERE, at this point, is Mr. Wilkerson guilty of anything?). Let me regurgitate some of the report: HE was not drunk or high at the moment the other vehicle smashed into the 2nd vehicle, he was making a LEGAL "U" turn, and his concern or control over what was behind him is irrelevant (no one can control what goes on in a vehicle that is coming behind one; one can only HOPE that person is following the Rules of the Road, and is not impaired or will run into one's vehicle from behind). OK, so Mr. Wilkerson left the scene of an accident HE did NOT cause, and he may have broken a law that I am unaware of, and he admits leaving the scene of a fatal accident... is he also going to be charged with Lincoln's Assassination, Lindbergh baby kidnapping and for the aftermath of Katrina in Louisiana, too? Sheesh, is leaving a scene of a fatal accident worse than CAUSING the accident while speeding and drunk...? Are those sheriffs cops screwing that girl and her mom (and possibly the dad)? Doesn't the DA and the Courts have any common sense?

  • Robin 02/24/2008 5:50:00 AM

    all the people defending the varker bitch are also the ones who will soon be in jail for drunk driving, dui's, dwi's, and all the other charges that goes with not knowing how to drive and how to respect people on the road on top of them being reckless drivers themselves. so i will say this. SEE YOUR SIMPLE ASSES IN THE NEWS SOON EITHER DEAD OR GOING TO JAIL FOR CAUSING A FATAL ACCIDENT LIKE SHE DID. PEACE

  • Anonymous 02/21/2008 5:11:00 PM

    He fled the scene of an accident. He is 28 years old, He knows better. Fleeing such a severe accident is much, much, much more of a crime than DUI.

  • Mike Fisher 02/18/2008 10:15:00 PM

    SORRY FOR THE CAPS, BUT THIS IS A POINT THAT HAS TO BE MADE. THE TRUTH OF THIS STORY IS NOT BLACK OR WHITE, NOT RICH OR POOR, NOT WHO WAS HIGHER/DRUNKER. IT ALL COMES DOWN TO ONE INDISPUTABLE, IRREFUTABLE, FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME FACT.................. WOMEN CAN'T DRIVE. PEACE!

  • JESSICA 02/18/2008 8:27:00 PM

    OK . . . THIS WHOLE THING IS SO FUCKING STUPID ! ! ! IT IS ALL LAURAS FAULT . . . SHE BOUGHT BOOZE WITH A FAKE ID , WAS ON THE RIVER GETTING DRUNK , FLASHING HER TITS FOR BEADS AND DRIVING LIKE A FUCKING IDIOT ! ! ! BRYANT WAS IN THE TURNING LANE MAKING A U-TURN AND INSTEAD OF GOING STRAIGHT LAURA DECIDED TO GO INTO THE WRONG LANE TO GET AROUND HIM . . . THAT IS OBVIOUSLY HER FAULT . . . HE WAS TURNING AND SHE WAS WASTED AND CANT DRIVE . . . SHE WAS IN A SIMILAR ACCIDENT A YEAR BEFORE THIS ONE . . . HER PARENTS SHOULD HAVE TAKEN HER VEHICLE FROM HER THEN AND IF THEY DID NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED ! ! ! I THINK ITS BULLSHIT THAT LAURA THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA TO DRIVE WASTED INSTEAD OF LETTING THE SOBER GIRL DRIVE . . . NO SHE HAS THE ONLY SOBER ONE IN BACK HOLDING THE TUBES WHILE SHE DRIVES WASTED . . . SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SMARTER AND NOT DROVE AND THIS WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED . . . THAT POOR LITTLE GIRL WOULD STILL BE HERE AND BRYANT WOULD NOT BE GOIN THREW ALL THIS BULLSHIT . . . YES HE SHOULD HAVE NOT LEFT THE SCENE BUT HE ALREAY WENT TO JAIL FOR THAT SO THAT SHOULD BE ENOUGH ! ! ! IT SHOULD BE DONE AND OVER WITH . . . LAURA SHOULD BE GOING TO JAIL FOR WHAT SHE DID NOT BRYANT ! ! ! BUT BECAUSE SHES RICH SHE WONT HAVE TO PAY FOR WHAT IS OBVIOUSLY HER FAULT ! ! ! SHE NEEDS TO LEARN THAT THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES FOR HER STUPID ACTIONS ! ! !

  • Robin 02/18/2008 8:24:00 PM

    ok i dont know what some of you are reading but heres exactly what i see in this fiasco and travesty of justice.#1 "Varker's blood-alcohol level was 0.09, over the legal limit for adults. And, as an underage driver, she was in violation of the law by having any amount of alcohol in her system." #2One of Varker's girlfriends, 15-year-old Felicia Edwards, didn't drink a drop. But it was Edwards who died when Varker's Yukon Denali hit another car and flipped over and over like a tumbleweed. #3. even after blood tests showed that Varker was legally drunk, and even after sheriff's investigators learned that it was she and another girl who'd flashed a fake ID and bought Coors Light and malt liquor for the group, Varker hasn't been charged with anything. #4.Instead of charging the affluent white girl, the sheriff's officers arrested the other driver, a black man, a guy who wasn't even legally drunk. #5. He's been charged with nine felony counts, including manslaughter and aggravated assault. #6. He was making a U-turn � which, again, was legal #7. a friend of Varker's who was just behind her on the highway, told deputies that the other car was slowing too dramatically for her to stop; Varker had to lurch into the center lane just to avoid rear-ending him. pls explain how she avoided this if she hit the car? #8. Police records say she failed to stop in time and slammed into another car on Cactus Road, which then hit the car in front of it.)(the first accident) #9. Their reports note that he smelled heavily of alcohol, that he'd admitted to smoking pot that morning, that he seemed drunk. #10. The problem is, all the tests came back well under the legal limit. Wilkerson blew a 0.049 on the sheriff's Breathalyzer. By the time the sheriff's officers did a blood test, which is widely considered much more accurate, Wilkerson's blood-alcohol content was only 0.01. The presence of marijuana was just as minimal. Wilkerson had only TRACE amounts in his bloodstream. #11. Never mind. The sheriff's deputies had made up their minds: Wilkerson was to blame for the crash. #12. Wilkerson learned in jail that the SUV driver had been legally drunk. #13. They were charging the guy who was below the legal limit with manslaughter, and they weren't charging the drunk with anything? #14. "In this particular case, within a few days, the sheriff's department had in their hands a report saying "SHE WAS LEGALLY DRUNK." #15. And yet they HAVENT charged her. #16. In early December, he says, he was finally informed that the Sheriff's Office had filed a supplemental report suggesting that CHARGES BE FILED AGAINST Varker. #17. Varker's lawyers have also hired a retired Phoenix cop, who surveyed the scene and concluded that Wilkerson erred when he slowed down to make the U-turn. By doing so, the former police officer wrote, Wilkerson impeded the flow of traffic, forcing Varker into the center lane. if she went into the center lane again how the hell did she hit him? #18.why he's the one looking at 21 years, while Laura Varker continues on her way. EXCUSE ME BUT IF HE HADNT OF SLOWED DOWN THEN HE WOULD HAVE BEEN NOT ONLY IMPEDING TRAFFIC BUT BREAKING THE LAW SO HE'S BEING CHARGED FOR FOLLOWING THE LAW. WHILE THE DRUNK AND LAW BREAKER IS STILL OUT AND ABOUT DRIVING AROUND MORE THEN LIKELY DRUNK!!! with all that said right there anyone who doesnt believe this is about race is full of shit. and they know it. the ONLY CHARGE HE SHOULD BE FACING IS LEAVING THE SCENE OF THE CRIME. that lil drunk girl should be the one facing everything else and the fact that this is her second driving accident should also play a part. it shows that she's already a danger on the road. with no care and concern for other drivers. if she is so right and did nothing wrong why is her family hiring so many lawyers and pressuring her friends not to talk to anyone? BECAUSE THEY KNOW. mark my words this wont be the only time that lil girl kills someone. its just the beginning for her. at 17 she has no business drinking. and those who sold them the beer and/or liquor should also be charged with selling to minors.and on top of that she's involving others in her bs. my prayers goes out to Mr Wilkerson and his family. you will make it thru this. you did the right thing in calling the NAACP. into it to help you. the sheriffs deputies are probably family and friends to the varkers. who if they dont force their child to face up to her wrong now. will soon be the ones burying their child. one way or another.

  • Nic 02/18/2008 5:16:00 PM

    I,m black and I thought OJ did it for the beginning, bad analogy. When I lived in Florida, a white girl (parents with money) hit 3 kids killing all of them, fleed the scene dragging one of them. Parents attorneys got her off. That was the first sign that I needed to leave Florida. But sadly this happens everywhere. James is completely correct. White people are still totally racist, and being a black golf professional, I am completely exposed to this. OJ got off because of money and money alone. This is what will happen with that spoiled brat, and she will probably do it again. If the police have label her legally drunk, then thats a felony, and if she caused an accident she needs to be held liable. Im sure it wont happen, sad but true. I see racism on the decline, but its our parents of any race that harness that racial divide. It's up to us to expunge that hate, not let your parents mold you improperly. Anyone teaching their children hate this day and age are going to be left behind i can assure you. People that become judges or law enforcement are corrupt as all hell, and hell bent on seeing their views through, don't kid yourself. Look at how are Supreme Court is appointed, by views. The girl will get a slap on the wrist unless an activist makes this large. They both need to be in trouble and charged for exactly what they have done. Phoenix Law Enforcement should be ashamed of themselves.

  • Kathy 02/18/2008 2:58:00 AM

    �from article..�The problem is, all the tests came back well under the legal limit. Wilkerson blew a 0.049 on the sheriff's Breathalyzer. By the time the sheriff's officers did a blood test, which is widely considered much more accurate, Wilkerson's blood-alcohol content was only 0.01.� Information from �wikipedia.com� *The rate of elimination (of alchohol) in the average person is commonly estimated at .015 to .020 percent per hour, although again this can vary from person to person and in a given person from one moment to another. *Approximate Blood Alcohol Percentage *Subtract approximately .01% every 40 minutes after drinking. Progressive Effects of Alcohol[1] BAC (%) Behavior Impairment 0.01�0.029 �Avg. individual appears normal �Subtle effects that can be detected with special tests 0.03�0.059 �Mild euphoria �Lowered alertness *Sense of well-being �Judgment *Relaxation *coordination �Talkativeness *concentration �Joyous *blunted feelings �Decreased inhibition *Relaxation �Talkativeness �Joyous �Decreased inhibition 0.06�0.10 �Disinhibition *depth perception �Extroversion *distance acuity �Impaired Sexual Pleasure �Reflexes Impaired �Reasoning *peripheral vision *glare recovery *However, it is generally accepted that the consumption from sober of two standard drinks (containing a total of 20 grams) of alcohol will increase the average person's BAC roughly 0.05% (a single standard drink consumed each hour after the first two will keep the BAC at approximately 0.05%), So what this says to me� *To be at .049 BAC when given a breathalizer test, he would have had to consumed at most 2 drinks, and have had at most one drink every hour to keep at that level. Doesn�t sound like heavy drinking to me� *To have a .01 on a blood test, the test would have been taken at most 2, possibly 3 hours after the breathalizer� this backward extrapolation is commonly used by law enforcement to determine the true BAC level at the time on the accident. Sounds like standard processing/booking time at most jail/incarceration locations to me (and that law enforcement is smart enough to realize time lowers a persons BAC thus the backward extrapolation)� *True, with affects of lowered alertness and judgement, as well as lowered coordination and concentration.. he should not have been driving, but was only minimally impaired. But, he was the lead car making what according to the article is a legal u-turn, it is the responibility of the person following to leave an appropriate distance to allow for reaction time� *(Ignoring being underage) She should not have been driving (also never should have allowed an unrestrained person in her vehicle) with a BAC of .09 which causes impaired: reflexes, reasoning, depth perception, distance acuity, peripheral vision, and glare recovery. Her going that speed, impaired is what caused this tragic accident. I agree that he should receive sentancing for fleeing the scene of a fatality accident, but that does not equal 21 years in ANY state. I think she should receive sentencing and punishment for 1. underage intoxication 2. driving while intoxicated 3. use of a fake id 4. reckless driving with an unrestrained passenger 5. involuntary manslaughter� and possible other violations under Arizona state statute that I am unfamiliar with. Seems like an open and close case gone HORRIBLY wrong to me.

  • John M. 02/17/2008 6:38:00 AM

    This article would have been helped out so much if it weren't for the blatant slant. Even the title is misleading, as I wouldn't call a guy who had a few beers and was high at the time "sober". The story writes itself, there is no need to skew it so much. The passive stance when discussing the wrongs that the guy made, while taking a very aggressive perspective against the girl was transparent and really effected the way I read the article. It could have easily been written like: "Laura Varker was a sweet 17 year old girl who everybody liked, while Bryant Wilkerson was a cowardly stoner whose thoughtless U-turn ended up with the death of Laura's best friend." The facts naturally make Varker appear to be in the wrong, as well as show the situation as being unfair. There is no need for the biased, emotional, journalism in this piece. I found it very distracting and unprofessional.

  • Kris 02/16/2008 6:01:00 PM

    I have a quick question. How is doing a U-Turn over a double yellow line legal? Most states say that it isn't. True, passing someone on the left is legal, but not when doing so means you go over a double yellow line. So in actuality, they are both at fault. But I wonder how she still had her license? In California, if you are found to have alcohol in your system and you are under age, your right to drive is taken. I get the point of the article, which is to question why only one person is being charged. And I have to wonder, too. Because if he had of just went up to a light with a turn lane ('cause it sounds like he missed his turn and decided to do a quickie turn) and if she had of been smart and had been traveling the correct distance, a death may not have accured. Now, we seem to also be over looking one big issue. One that is worth a huge ticket here in California. The victum should have been wearing her seat belt. What, they don't show the scared straight video of what happens when you don't wear a seat belt? I am terrified not to wear mine. Hold down the tubes? Isn't that what rope is for? And you can't use "they are teenagers" as an excuss. I am one and I would have said either find some rope and get a guy to tie it down or would have left them as they were. As I see it, they are three victims here, all who have suffered from a bout of stupidity. All well, this is just my opinion.

  • whatever 02/14/2008 6:48:00 PM

    some people cannot read...i swear...you only see what you want to see. he got a breathalyzer at the scene, LUKE: "The problem is, all the tests came back well under the legal limit. Wilkerson blew a 0.049 on the sheriff's Breathalyzer. By the time the sheriff's officers did a blood test, which is widely considered much more accurate, Wilkerson's blood-alcohol content was only 0.01. The presence of marijuana was just as minimal. Wilkerson had only trace amounts in his bloodstream." ADDITIONALLY, she was under 21 and had been drinking. no matter what her alcohol content was, underaged drinking=no tolerance. and she was driving too fast, swerved into a lane illegally, was following too closely, etc. she was also at fault...more at fault, actually. but nobody seems to get that. not saying he doesn't have any fault, because he does. but not 21 years of prison worth. ms. varner should also have the same penalties as he does and be under house arrest..

  • whatever 02/14/2008 2:23:00 PM

    by the way...according to the driving manual, leaving the scene of the crash involving death means your driving privilege is revoked for five years... http://www.azdot.gov/mvd/documents/CustomerServiceGuide_99-0117.pdf not that you go to jail for 21 years. and additionally, the penalties added together STILL do not equal 21 years if you are under the influence. plus, he was driving the OTHER car, she was BEHIND him, it was her fault. smells a little fishy to me...

  • Luke 02/14/2008 2:18:00 PM

    What the hell is wrong with you, race-baiter? .09 is not high enough to be dangerous, and you suggest that just because she's under 21 it's somehow drunk driving to have any alcohol in you. No, driving drunk is drunk driving. And fleeing the scene of an accident is worse. How can your headline say he's SOBER because he eluded authorities for hours until his breath test sank a little below the girls? This is the worst "journalism" I've ever read.

  • whatever 02/14/2008 2:12:00 PM

    i'm pretty sure what the stupid girl did was reckless driving, and this is the law: 28-693. Reckless driving; classification; license; surrender A. A person who drives a vehicle in reckless disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving. B. A person convicted of reckless driving is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor. C. In addition, the judge may require the surrender to a police officer of any driver license of the convicted person, shall report the conviction to the department and may order the driving privileges of the person to be suspended for a period of not more than ninety days. On receipt of the abstract of conviction and order, the department shall suspend the driving privilege of the person for the period of time ordered by the judge. D. If a person who is convicted of a violation of this section has been previously convicted of a violation of this section, section 13-1102 or section 13-1103, subsection A, paragraph 1, in the driving of a vehicle, or section 28-708, 28-1381, 28-1382 or 28-1383 within a period of twenty-four months: 1. The person is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. 2. The person is not eligible for probation, pardon, suspension of sentence or release on any basis until the person has served not less than twenty days in jail. 3. The judge may require the surrender to a police officer of any driver license of the person and shall immediately forward the abstract of conviction to the department. 4. On receipt of the abstract of conviction, the department shall revoke the driving privilege of the person. E. The dates of the commission of the offense are the determining factor in applying subsection D of this section. A second or subsequent violation for which a conviction occurs as provided in this section does not include a conviction for an offense arising out of the same series of acts. F. On pronouncement of a jail sentence under this section, and after the court receives confirmation that the person is employed or is a student, the court may provide in the sentence that if the defendant is employed or is a student the defendant can continue employment or schooling for not more than twelve hours per day nor more than five days per week. The defendant shall spend the remaining days or parts of days in jail until the sentence is served and shall be allowed out of jail only long enough to complete the defendant's actual hours of employment or schooling. PS kris..i would like you to state where you found out that if you are making a legal u-turn and someone hits you from BEHIND, that you are at fault. because i'm pretty sure if you rear-end someone because you are following too closely, you are always at fault, and that's exactly what happened here..hmmm...

  • Eric 02/14/2008 12:55:00 AM

    He ran. He panicked. He was wrong for doing that. OK. She was underage, drunk, buying booze and had a record of causing an accident in the past. I read a lot of responses in here and for all of you who think this guy was wrong, why aren't you addressing what she did wrong. If it were you driving drunk, don't you think you would have done some kind of jail time? Kids, remember, if your rich, you can get away with anything. This is the life lesson learned here? He made a legal U turn...she hit him. I wonder how things would have played out if he stayed?... To this day, DWB's still occur. Damn.

  • Shawn Felder 02/13/2008 3:33:00 AM

    Wow, I read this entire story and I am extremely shocked. I don't even know where to start. I am not about to take you back through this entire situation again, for it has already put a burden on your life. However, I do have a way for you to get the legal help you need. I don't know if you ever heard of this in your town before, but it's called Pre-Paid Legal Services. I will go more in detail with it for you more when you email me. It's just like have Johnnie by your side. It is far better then having a public defender. I look forward to hearing from you very very soon. Justice must be brought to you and your family.

  • Sam 02/13/2008 2:17:00 AM

    That still wouldn't set him anywhere near 21 years though. The law in big cities has become corrupted and volatile (in most of them anyway).

  • kris 02/12/2008 11:56:00 PM

    What people need to understand is the word of the law. If he made a U-turn on a highway (even if it is LEGAL as stated repeatedly by the writer) and was involved in an accident he is AT FAULT. Period. When making a U-turn you never have the right-of-way. The fact that he had alcohol and an illegal narcotic in his system then ran from the scene only make it worse. Yes, the girl should have been wearing her seatbelt, and the driver girl was an idiot for drinking and driving and probably speeding (and most would agree should face some comparative negligence). But he is at fault for a collision resulting in a fatality and had alcohol in his system. The article states he made only one bad decision by leaving the scene, but he made three. You don't have to have a .08 to be drunk if you cause an accident. Any amount of alcohol will make the charges worse. The biased way that this story is presented completely devalues any information you could glean from it. It's a pathetic example of race-baiting at its worst.

  • Lynn 02/12/2008 4:28:00 PM

    I find it really interesting that she has not even been charged with underage drinking. My son was stoped for a tail light issues and arrested for drinking and driving at 19. He was not charged witha DUI because he was well under the limit but he was charged with underage drinking. Peoria went after him like a killer and he didnt get in a accident. He was alone. He spent 3 days in jail... and we got a attorney. The system is very one sided and plays what ever roll it wants. Bottom line..you have money you by freedom. So instead of complaining donate to help this young man get a fair trail.

  • Joe 02/12/2008 3:36:00 AM

    I hope NT updates us on this trial. 21 years for fleeing a scene? For 10 minutes? Is that for real? Seriously, how the fuck are prison terms decided in this stupid country? What are pedophiles getting these day--6 months? What about rapists? Hell, even murderers? Police are fucking worthless... My head is going to explode.

  • Sam 02/11/2008 1:21:00 AM

    If the world is really being run by people LIKE HER, then I feel sorry for it...

  • miss 02/09/2008 1:49:00 PM

    This is very injustice. Rich people LIKE HER makes the world go around.

  • Sam 02/08/2008 12:09:00 PM

    How can this be so complicated? It is amazingly simple! The guy was making a legal u-turn, when all of a sudden the girl comes out of nowhere, drunk as a fish, (SHE) hits his rear bumper, and yet he gets 21 years? Granted, he had traces of mariguana, yes, he had something to drink, ok, he ran off. At the most, note again the word "MOST", he should have recieved MAYBE 8 years. But 21? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that there is something wrong with that picture. Not only that, but the girl was drunk, she did not enforce the rules of the state by not telling her friends to buckle up, which as a driver she should have done, and she ended up killing her friend! As far as i'm concerned, her parents are stupid, irresponsible, demented, retarded, and utterly arrogant people who are the ones who should be getting the 21 years in prison! That also goes for the police officers and detectives who concluded that the victim was at fault! And for those of you who think i'm wrong, I dare you to come down to Globe and tell that to my face! Down here in GHS, we don't tolerate racism.

  • what 02/07/2008 7:45:00 PM

    first of all, ash-they make comments on a story open so that people can give their opinion. last time i checked, we leave in a free country and have a right to give our "two CENTS" on topics that are posted on a PUBLIC website. and opinions do matter. yours was pointless. and for everyone who keeps pointing out that he didn't look in his rear view mirror, i don't look at mine 100% of the time when im making a u-turn because i would expect that the person driving behind me would be paying attention. when you make a u-turn, you are supposed to be making sure that cars are not APPROACHING. do you look in your rear-view mirror when you make a right-hand turn? it's the same damn thing!!! they are both at fault. he doesn't deserve 21 years..she does..and an innocent life was lost due to irresponsibility. he fled the scene and should get time. she controlled the vehicle that caused a friend to die. i don't see why she wouldn't get ANY sort of punishment even if the other guy did for some reason have partial blame. yet, he was the leading car and she should have paid more attention. it shouldn't be THAT complicated.

  • latania johnshon 02/07/2008 1:48:00 PM

    This is unbelievable ! That stupid girl should not have been driving again. Just another example of what happens when rich people don't pay attention to their kids. "they are drunk behind a wheel at 17" Does this girl have any kind of education at 17, does anyone even care.????

  • Bill Smith 02/06/2008 7:11:00 PM

    I am getting sick and tired of people playing the race card. The real issue here is he took off... This story seems awfully one sided. This man WAS drinking and SMOKING POT. He is involved in an accident and takes off. A woman dies. Regardless of the OTHER DRIVER and all that other BULL.... He should have been in Jail for at least 3 months. Quit playing a race card for irresponsible behavior.

  • Josh Cordell 02/06/2008 3:09:00 AM

    This makes me sick! Thank you for your reporting.

  • frank legarde 02/05/2008 9:31:00 PM

    Once again,justice is proven to be not blind.I wonder what the outcome would have been for a white male in the same set of circumstances.

  • Michael 02/05/2008 2:27:00 PM

    If anyone thinks this girl should not be punished then you are obviously retarded. Zero toleranc in AZ for drinking and driving mates which means they arent just going to let someone go believe me...Ya that man should be punished for leavin the scene but that girl was drunkER than the man driving AND underage so I hope that bitch gets alot more than a slap on the wrist. When has anyone ever fender bendered someone and not been accountable for it? Az has the worst laws ever...

  • John 02/04/2008 1:31:00 PM

    Just further proves, justice in Maricopa County is for sale as long as your white and have money and Candy Ass Thomas is the County Attorney.....

  • Angelino 02/03/2008 6:13:00 PM

    Some of you say it's class, not race, that's the real factor. Well, there's some truth to that, but in this country, race used to be a caste system, and being African American or mixed race meant that you were way more likely to be poor than whites. And being white meant you were more likely to be affluent or wealthy. There were jobs that people of color were simply not given, positions above which they could not rise, and property they could not purchase. In this country, we have inheritance (and under Bush, a tyranny where estate taxes are cut), and this transfers the old wealth, created through racism, into the present day. That inheritance is racist. (There's also regular racism we inherit too, but, I'm talking about class here.) If you want to see real justice, then, in every case where there's rich folks and poor folks, let the people pay into a common legal fund, and then split that fund equally, and purchase legal services. Let the rich girl's parents pay for lawyers for the poor man, so that he can purchase justice.

  • Damos Abadon 02/02/2008 3:28:00 PM

    Man, just... man! This is why i hate this country soo much!!!

  • concerned 02/01/2008 6:25:00 PM

    YOUR ARE FORGETTING ABOUT FELICIA EDWARDS. WHERE'S THE JUSTICE IN THIS FOR HER. SHE'S DEAD IN A GRAVE FOR GOD'S SAKE AND DRUNK RECKLESS DRIVER'S PUT HER THERE. REMEMBER HER. THEN FEEL SORRY FOR ALL CONCERNED. THEN REMEMBER HEER FAMILY WHO ARE NOW DEPRIVED OF HER IN THEIR LIVES.

  • ash 02/01/2008 1:55:00 PM

    Obviously no one is going to post the police report because it's hundreds of pages long.. and NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!! you people should find something else to do with your boring lives because your two sense is a waste of your time, and doesn't matter.

  • Kim 01/31/2008 10:04:00 PM

    I knew Felicia Edwards very very well she was like my niece. Let me tell all of you out there Felicia was the only one that was not under the influence of a damn thing and Bryant Wilkerson was under the legal BAC levels. The only one that was under anything was the Driver Laura Varker. She knew she drank to much and still drove with Felicia in the car. She is totally responsible for the death of her friend. With friends like Laura who needs enemies.. Also this isn't about Race its about a 15 year old girl taken from her family and friends and the only one being held accountable is Bryant because he is over the age of 21 and he was sober. however Laura is 17 mommy and daddy are loaded and she gets nothing even though she has been in 3 other accidents all caused by her own actions.... See a pattern... Race card my ass know the facts before you call it a racial issue. Next time you have to view a 15 year olds body laying dead in a funeral home then tell me its about race... grow the hell up and see the real issues.... DRUNK DRIVING CAUSES DEATH!!!!!!

  • Amber 01/31/2008 8:11:00 AM

    Chris~ I dont think you're understanding how it went down. She was driving behind him, he slowed down to make a u-turn, she swerved because she was following him too close (also illegal I might add) and still managed to hit him. Its not like he was making a u-turn and cut her off. She was behind him! She rear ended him, how the darn heck did he cause the accident?? The u-turn was very much so legal, people are suppose to slow down when they see other people in front of them slowing down. She was clearly in the wrong, and he clearly did not cause the accident. Read it more closely next time.

  • Amber 01/31/2008 8:11:00 AM

    Chris~ I dont think you're understanding how it went down. She was driving behind him, he slowed down to make a u-turn, she swerved because she was following him too close (also illegal I might add) and still managed to hit him. Its not like he was making a u-turn and cut her off. She was behind him! She rear ended him, how the darn heck did he cause the accident?? The u-turn was very much so legal, people are suppose to slow down when they see other people in front of them slowing down. She was clearly in the wrong, and he clearly did not cause the accident. Read it more closely next time.

  • Amber 01/31/2008 7:57:00 AM

    Im sorry but I think she should go down too. She was legally drunk, and just because she has a rich family with a ton of lawyers she will get off scott free. She doesn't deserve too. She's at fault here. Someone doing a legal U-turn shouldn't be faulted. She has had an accident where she was obviously following too close and rear ended someone, so what makes people believe that she wasn't doing that exact same thing again?? However, he should be charged with fleeing the scene. He did do that! He shouldn't have left, but since we can see what they're putting him through I understand why he did.

  • Kiwi 01/31/2008 4:21:00 AM

    This is certainly a tragedy; for a young girl's life to be taken away due to alcohol. Commenting about the court case though, I'm glad I don't live in AZ because I've heard things and this only confirms it. The journalist entitled is correctly. The guy is guilty of leaving the scene of the accident, I agree as well as with him having some drugs in his system but to charge him with 21 years or even think about it would be absurd. Socioeconomic status and race are at play here. White females are often depicted as "damsels in distress" in situations like this and throughout the media and I for one am fed up with it. The girl is just as guilty as the guy is, if not more because she was drinking UNDERAGE and DRIVING with a car full of PEOPLE. She shouldn't get off free. The judicial system of America is very biased, and this goes to show you what money can buy: JUSTICE.

  • Victoria 01/31/2008 4:18:00 AM

    THIS STORY'S OUTCOME IS SOOOOO BONK! I feel for this dude. That little girl should be punished to the extent of the law. It pisses me off to think that someone who may have had a drink earlier, or a hit but was most likely in control is superseded by some really drunk, out of control daddy's girl. he's obviously older and more experienced... accident's happen, but this seems so blatant. that little girl should be in jail ALSO -- in the very least.

  • Tony Lancaster 01/30/2008 7:57:00 PM

    Only in America

  • concerned 01/30/2008 7:27:00 PM

    Nothing like tainting the jury pool with this junk. Way to go new times way to go

  • Me 01/30/2008 6:09:00 AM

    To be honest, yes she gets off easily but legally he WAS driving under the influence, had illegal substances and hit and ran. Thus he has what he had coming how about NOT mislabeling the article, journalists aren't supposed to be bias' do your damn job.

  • Susan 01/30/2008 3:04:00 AM

    Sensationalizing this tragic accident and framming this as a racist incident is incredibly irresponsible of this New Times reporter. Excusing her misrepresentation of the facts, she must not have actully read the police report. Typical New Times reporting. Perhaps she had Wilkerson explain the facts to her.

  • Gault 01/30/2008 2:36:00 AM

    Wilkerson was stoned and drunk when he decided to whip an illegal U turn, knowingly leaving 2 kids laying in the street bleeding, then leading police on a high speed chase, potentially creating more victims. Of course he was scared.....he was also shit-faced. His blood alcohol was under the limit......5 hours after the collision when it was measured. Do the math....report the facts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Realist 01/30/2008 2:34:00 AM

    Citizen, You are obviously biased in favor of the Varkers. You should take a step back and think about what you are saying.

  • Terri Martin 01/30/2008 2:29:00 AM

    Mr. Wilkerson should have received nothing more than a slap on the wrist. He is innocent through all of this. A ticket for a moving violation is the only 'punishment' he should receive. What is this 'maximum security?' What has this man done that he should have to pay a price for someone else's (Varker's)callous acts? On the other hand, Ms. Varker is 100% guilty, was not in control of her vehicle and for good cause (her judgment was clearly impaired due to alcohol consumption) and she thinks she can just hide behind her rich parents and their attorneys. She should be facing manslaughter charges and spend her next 21 years behind bars. Maybe (?) she'll grow up in those 21 years and think next time before she gets behind the wheel. Again, this man has been wrongly accused of manslaughter. Let's not start another LA riot!

  • whatever 01/29/2008 9:33:00 PM

    FIRST OFF: i would like to see the exact police report. not one that looks like someone typed up themselves. it would be great to have a link or some reference point where the information that was typed up could be found. and i would like to comment on these so called "facts from the police report" that citizen seems to live by...if you don't believe what the new times printed (which can be one-sided) how can you believe what some idiot posted here? Things that were not mentioned in the article: -wilkerson fled the scene of an accident with three people in his car begging him to go back.

  • Sabrina 01/29/2008 9:24:00 PM

    It figures this girl is getting off without being charged with anything. Not only is she white, but apparently rich. I'm sure her parents have some political clout to help her get away with this crime. Sad thing is that she seems to be an apparent danger to the public. She had a wreck at 16 and obviously hadn't learned a thing because daddy gets her out of messes. Her punishment will catch up with her. You may escape the Maricopa County Court, but not God.

  • Citizen 01/29/2008 7:02:00 PM

    Well, we already know the New Times is racist and hates white people. The New Times wants to play judge, jury and executioner on this case, and is enlisting readers to do the same, but where is the police report and the map of the accident scene? Without those, it's hard to determine fault. However, fleeing the scene of an accident where there's known, or reasonably assumed, to be bodily injury... that is the action of a man who knows he is at fault. These facts posted by someone earlier bear repeating... Things that were not mentioned in the article: -wilkerson fled the scene of an accident with three people in his car begging him to go back. -wilkerson saw two bodies flying around in the suv in his rear veiw mirrow. -wilkerson not only fled the scene, but led the deputies in a chase after being caught. -as detected by a drug specialist, wilkerson was under the influence of marajuana alcohol and several cantral nervous system depressants. -wilkersons blood was not taken till 4 hours and 52 minutes after his arrest. -wilkerson also received an additional count for dropping off those three girls who wanted nothing to do with him and to help the two girls. -those three girls turned him in the next day because they, "knew it was the right thing to do." -wilkerson never used his turn signal. -wilkerson never looked in his rear veiw before he entered his u-turn. -wilkerson left a 15 year old girl to die there that day. -every interviewing deputy stated there were numerous signs of alcohol on his breath and in his eyes. -every interviewing deputy stated there was no sign of varkers involvement with alcohol. -wilkerson went to jail. I'm not judge, jury and executioner, but if those facts are supported by the police report, then that's some pretty pertinent evidence that the New Times chose not to print.

  • Treva 01/29/2008 3:14:00 PM

    it's bloody ridiculous to send a man to jail because some spoiled, over-privileged moron couldn't be arsed to obey traffic laws. we all know the varker twit will get off in the footsteps of paris hilton, lindsay lohan et al because the american "justice" system is a joke & rotten from the inside out, just like a lot of the people leaving comments to this story. it's really easy to deny that racism exists when you don't ever have to deal with it, huh?

  • Harolynne Bobis 01/29/2008 10:28:00 AM

    I cannot believe this is happening. There will be no repercussions to the young woman who caused the accident at all? That race and class and wealth will be the most important factors here, rather than drunk driving?

  • Kathryn 01/29/2008 2:43:00 AM

    This story outrages me. It's sad to believe that just because Varker has money and a bunch of lawyers, she can get off easy, while Wilkerson was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. The authorities say that his u-turn slowed down traffic and was dangerous? What? And Varker's absolutely reckless drunk driving isn't ten times more dangerous?? I don't understand the logic in this. I hope the justice system takes a serious second look at this case, and charges the right person this time. It's hard to believe that this is even an issue.

  • EU 01/28/2008 10:16:00 PM

    What is the purpose of putting this young lady or black man into jail for 21 years? It was an accident and not done on purpose. She will suffer anyway for the rest of her life. One life was already destroyed, why permanently destroy another young life? Luckily we in Europe usually put people responsible for this kind of accidents for maximum of 3 years into prison. You Americans are obsessed with a revenge.

  • Kathy 01/28/2008 10:12:00 PM

    Wow, your contempt for white, rich, white, girls, and/or white people is so subtle, I barely noticed it. What is it exactly that you hate more? White or rich? You know, there is a sad myth that racism is something only white people are afflicted with. I beg to differ. Sweetly and innocently making a u-turn shortly after adorably smoking pot and drinking alcohol, and then running freely with a song in your heart is a crime. Even if a raging, shrieking madwoman wielding a massive weapon of destruction is behind you. Sorry 'bout yer luck, pal. Maybe next time you WON'T smoke pot and drive, and WON'T drink and drive, and WON'T run from the cops. You never know when a white rich person might sneak up on you!

  • -P 01/28/2008 2:29:00 PM

    Timeline, I didn't say you missed anything. Seems that you read the article word for word without any skepticism that the facts may be somewhat muddied. But hey, If the New Times wrote, it MUST be true.

  • Citizen 01/28/2008 2:20:00 PM

    The liberal motto: "Stop confusing us with facts, our minds are made up."

  • Nancy 01/28/2008 12:05:00 PM

    They both need to go to jail for that girl's death.....Cinco de drinko?? come on, anybody who feels like the girl didn't have a part in this is a complete idiot. She would have left too if her friend wasn't in her car.

  • Nick 01/28/2008 7:48:00 AM

    Damn racists. you ask what kind of man runs off, well this just tells that you have never been in an accident, take your mind out of the movies, not every guys reaction is the same. oh poor girl, she did not know what she was doing, it was not her fault that her friends forced her to drink, and forced her to drive. That girl and her parents should be arrested, and the guy should be exonerated of all charges and compensated for what he has been through

  • Citizen 01/27/2008 9:42:00 PM

    The New Times seems intent on destroying it's credibility with all these specious race-baiting stories of late.

  • Citizen 01/27/2008 9:27:00 PM

    New Times Staff wrote (commenting on another article): "Call a person a racist. I love it. Smart. Strategic indeed. When a person throws that word out, it forces the receiver of the tort to respond. The proof of not being a racist nows sits on the person you just called a racist. Problem is...how do you prove you aren't a racist? How do you prove you aren�t a racist (when you aren�t) without looking like you are a racist trying to prove you aren�t? It�s quite the puzzle." C: I always wondered why the New Times throws that charge around so much. Now we have it right from the horses mouth.

  • Mary 01/27/2008 9:25:00 PM

    Shame on New Times and their reporter for writing such a one-sided article full of inaccuracies. To name a few, Varker was not drunk. Felicia would not ride with a drunk. This is not a racial issue. The police report says Mr. Wilkerson is white and half the kids with Varker that day were black. Varker did not buy alcohol or does she have a fake ID. I know the Varker's and they're not rich nor would they tell anyone not to talk! Mr. Wilkerson was intoxicated at the time of the accident - they didn't take his readings until many hours later. This was a very tragic accident and I feel sorry for everyone involved.

  • Citizen 01/27/2008 6:13:00 PM

    Remember everyone: "Black Is Good and White Is Bad". Keep reading the New Times for more important revelations.

  • Citizen 01/27/2008 6:10:00 PM

    Recurring New Times theme: "Black Good, White Bad". To really make a determination of who was at fault, we'd need to see a map of the accident scene. The New Times should have printed one. I'm curious to see if the "allowed U-turns" were allowed from that lane, or only from the turnoff lane. Also, did the guy have his blinker on to make a U-turn? If not, that would explain why the girl went to pass him on the left, standard operator procedure, if the guy was merely slowing down, but did not have his blinker on. In that case, the substance ingestion by the girl would have been irrelevant, if she was still driving reasonably and according to the law. But, the New Times has an agenda to push... "black good, white bad", and it will be pushed, inconvenient facts be damned.

  • William White 01/27/2008 5:54:00 PM

    Seems that black and Texas is a bad combo but it really doesn't surprise me. These are the same people who elected Geogie boy Governor and jailed people for life for Marijuana possession. It may be cold but I thank God I live in Canada.

  • annmarie 01/27/2008 4:16:00 PM

    Both Varker and Wilkerson should receive legal penalties--Wilkerson for driving under the influence of marijuana and fleeing the scene of the accident, and Varker for purchasing and consuming alcohol while underage and driving while legally intoxicated. Both of them should serve jail time, be stripped of their licenses, and be forced to attend a drug program. Both of them were responsible for their drug use while driving. I don't see this as being a racial issue but being more about economic class; the police seem to be intimidated by Varker's family connections and their ability to hire "dream team" type lawyers and coerce witnesses into lying or refusing to testify. I can only hope the next time Miss Varker causes an accident (and there will be a next time), she is the one who suffers the brunt of the physical and legal damages. Varker is an ignorant teenager, and until she's willing to accept full accountability for her actions she'll be an ignorant adult.

  • jeebus 01/27/2008 2:31:00 PM

    this is kind of sad. a man gets charged with what the other person should have gotten, bitch gets of scott-free. bitch is loli, too. LOLI LOEV CHEAP BEIR. LOLI LIEK KILLING PEOPLE. THIS POST IS RETARDED. 4CHAN.ORG - GO TO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. DO IT. YOU WON'T DO IT, DO IT. 4CHAN.ORG.

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy