Feedback from the Issue of Thursday, November 20, 2008


I was a private investor in the movie, and I recall the description of the investment in the prospectus indicated rather clearly that I was investing in a movie, not a titty bar in Scottsdale ("Sylvia Nobel and the Case of the Missing Movie," Sarah Fenske, November 13).

It also indicated funds collected for the movie were to be kept in suitable bank accounts, until drawn upon for production expenses. I don't recall anything in the prospectus that allows the lawyer, working for the people who are producing and investing in the project, to divert the funds to a nightclub run by his brother. Whatever happened to fiduciary responsibility?

It also seems to me that a lawyer working on such a project has a higher ethical standard to meet to avoid conflicts of interest, especially when partnering with clients who are not legal experts. A lawyer has to represent the interests of his clients, not his own personal cash flow needs. Is that too much to ask?

If he had problems with Nobel, just walk away. He had nothing but his time, not his capital, in the movie. I don't care whether she is dramatic or not. That does not condone diverting the money for his own purposes.

Mark Briggs makes all the ugly-lawyer jokes I have ever heard in my life seem complimentary to lawyers. He is a disgrace to his profession, and really his greatest critics should be his fellow lawyers.
Marvin Musslewhite, Phoenix

One surprise after another: In these uncertain and trying times, one must learn to expect the unexpected. But still, Sarah Fenske's article "The Case of the Missing Movie" brought with it some jolting surprises.

How could a man, Mark Briggs — who couldn't come up with important and relevant financial records because he "kept forgetting them" (early onset Alzheimers?) or was so color-blind he couldn't figure out which folder his secretary had handed him — manage to associate himself with a fine and much respected firm such as Quarles and Brady? And what reputable lawyer would try to pass off unsigned, double-dated documents as legitimate?

Meanwhile, how could a [teacher], Chris LaMont, maintain a position at ASU, which is ceaselessly seeking to upgrade its faculty?

It goes to show that just when you think you've seen it all, you haven't.
Elizabeth Lewis, Phoenix


Tricky Dick-level paranoia: Your point about Captain Joel Fox of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office is right on ("Arpaio's Watergate," The Bird, Stephen Lemons, November 13). It really is similar to the infamous [Watergate] burglary in that the, um, Committee to Re-Elect Joe Arpaio really didn't need to resort to a smear of Dan Saban in the last election, just as Richard Nixon's guys didn't need to break into the Watergate Hotel to beat George McGovern.

It really does show a level of paranoia not seen since the days of Tricky Dick. Not all that surprising, when you think about it, if you consider the vendettas that Joe's clowns have perpetrated over the years against real and perceived enemies.

I hope and pray that state Attorney General Terry Goddard does just as you suggest and puts Fox under the hot lights until he spills his guts on how all this came about. Maybe give him a plea bargain if he will "rat fuck" the people really behind this.

I doubt senile, old Arpaio — whose best use is atop a float during the Veterans Day parade — was behind it. (I'm not kidding, there he was right out there for everybody to see. Made me wonder why he's so disturbed about New Times' printing his address when he made himself vulnerable to the crowd on city streets?)

Who might the mastermind behind the Sheriff's Command Association scandal (as you say, SCA-gate) be? I think we can all make a good guess.
Luis Alvarez, Phoenix

Does Terry have the nerve?: Let's hope that Attorney General Terry Goddard has the nerve to go after "Mr." Joel Fox and the MCSO. We all know that Goddard's famous for not sticking his neck out. Hope springs eternal, though! Goddard could get the credit for bringing down old Joe when nobody else could.
Sandra Valerie, Phoenix

An early present for Goddard: Well, here it is, Goddard — a big, early Christmas present nice and wrapped for you! Let's see you do the right thing and prosecute this, as it should be. Don't say you can't because of a conflict of interest about an investigation that Arpaio doesn't even have jurisdiction to do in the first place ("King of Pain," The Bird, April 26, 2007).
David Saint, Phoenix

Good Liddy imitation: You mousey news types who just love to hide behind your desks and your First Amendments and your fat bellies have such a grand ol' time talkin' trash about everybody else. You even got your little boobs following you around chanting your praises and demanding that "something be done."

But you're a sidelines kinda guy. A storyteller. A witness. A puny, wanna-be-important attention whore who stays at work all night because it's just too depressing to go back to your rundown studio apartment and watch reruns of old cartoons while eating your last can of hash.

Next Page »
My Voice Nation Help
Magdalena La Palma
Magdalena La Palma

Lynn Benson, usted es una verg�a la raza humana para apoyar falta de honradez en funcionarios p�os. Est�adres se averg� de que nunca te trajo al mundo. Los mexicanos en este estado, ya sean legales o ilegales, son mucho mejores ejemplos de la humanidad de lo que ser�unca.

Jim Cozzolino
Jim Cozzolino

It never ceases to amaze me how many sick, twisted racist slimballs there are in Maricopa County.

david saint
david saint

Lynn Benson, then you, like the rest, have brought yourself to a level FAR below that of illegals...they havent sold out their country while they pretend to be defending their country..i mean forget why this country was founded and we have a Constitution, Bill of Rights, etc,you know for REASONS JUST LIKE THIS..So CONGRATS, i will give you that at least you can admit your a fascist, racist POS, and a sell out though.

Phoenix Concert Tickets