Feedback from the Issue of Thursday, September 17, 2009

WACKO PASTOR

And they'll call it The Nutty Preacher: I know, somebody should make a movie about Steven Anderson called The Nutty Preacher. The Bird's story was eye-popping, and then I saw [Anderson] on TV and on the Feathered Bastard blog.

When I first saw the stories on him getting hassled by the Border Patrol, I was among those yelling for the officers involved to be brought to justice. But, then, The Bird figures out that he's just an attention-seeking nut-job, a wacko who's out to make a name for himself in the most vicious way: calling for the death of the president of the United States.

Sound like anybody else we know (not that Joe Arpaio's publicly calling for anybody's death)? Next thing we know, Anderson will be running for sheriff (if the current, camera-happy nut-job dies of old age, that is).


Thom Dees, address withheld

Bones to pick with The Bird: First, let me say that Pastor Steven Anderson is just as "cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs" as Mr. Christopher Broughton, if not more so.

Just watch a few of his videos on YouTube, and you'll see just what kind of nut-job he is. In one video, he is seen at Sky Harbor Airport chasing down a law enforcement officer who happens to be casually patrolling the terminal sidewalk; he asks the officer why he is "harassing citizens" with his assault rifle. This from a man who has at least one congregation member who carries one himself!

That being said, I would like to pick a couple of bones regarding your article. You mention that equating Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler is a dumb comparison, and I agree. However, the left frequently called George W. Bush the same or worse for the entire eight years he was president. Idiotic and hyperbolic comments are not the exclusive property of either the right or the left.

Second, you correctly state, "In America, year 2009, abortions performed in the early stages of pregnancy are legal." Broughton attempts to use slavery as an example of how legal does not necessarily equate to moral. You defend the difference by stating that slaves "were living human beings, not masses of cells." But in the 1860s and before, that was not what was believed be a vast majority of the world. Slaves were not human beings at all, but property, less important than a mass of cells with the potential to become human. In fact, I would tend to bet that a person committing abortion back then would have been looked down upon far more than someone who killed one of his own slaves.

Society's morals and views change pendulously with time, as do our laws. Your seeming defense that because abortion is legal, it is okay, does not seem particularly sound.

Finally, the sideswipe at Christians regarding wishing death upon President Obama was uncalled-for. The vast, vast majority of Christians live up to the true meaning of the word, the few crackpots being the ones making the news.
Christopher J. McCarthy, via the Internet

Who's the real nut-job here?: You write an article about you going to a nut-job's church, [yet] everyone knows Steven Anderson is a nut. There's something wrong with his brain, and his education is not only minimal, it is plain wrong. So who is more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows the fool?

You go to Anderson's church and expect to be able to reason logically with the AR-15 dude. Oh, you mean the AR-15 dude is ill-informed and missing a few screws? Who the hell woulda thought?! So to you, I say: your article didn't do anything but tell us that you're pretty crazy, as well. Maybe not Steven-Anderson-crazy (thankfully) but pretty crazy for expecting someone incapable of proper reasoning to reason properly.
Austin S. Martin, via the Internet

PHOENIX FIREBUG

"Burning Man" is a cautionary tale: Just another con man caught with his pants down. Or were they off when he exited his house supposedly in scuba gear after apparently setting it ablaze? Hard to believe he thought he could get away with it.

I'm surprised you didn't make more of his Wall Street days. That part of the story's ironic, even if it doesn't directly relate to Michael Marin's economic woes that led up to what appears to be his dirty deed.

This was a fascinating yarn because you know that, in these hard economic times, a lot of people are thinking about doing the same thing with property that has lost most of its value. This is a cautionary tale.
John Wendell, Phoenix

He should've known: I don't know why, but I feel kind of sorry for Michael Marin. I hope it turns out that he didn't do it, but it certainly looks bad for him. A smart guy like him should've known that it's damn hard to get away with arson.
Mike McCarthy, Phoenix

When the going gets tough, they cheat: Just another slick Wall Street type who thought he could get away with anything! These kinds of people amaze me. They've always gotten what they want, and when things start to go bad for them, they cheat. Or that's certainly how it looks from your story on Michael Marin.

1
 
2
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
Patriot
Patriot

Michael Marin, what a piece of crap he is. Just another liar who thinks their smarter than everyone else out there. He's a legend in his own mind! haha

Paul
Paul

While riding through the central corridor yesterday, I noticed a number of people waiting for the "new" tram. But these people (some of whom were sitting on the ground while many others were standing), were doing so because there was not enough adequate seats for them to use. I further noticed that the seats are only located on one side and not on both of the "Tram Stops". Why is this? I will tell you, all along the "Tram Routes" there has been placed the most god ugly forms of "art work"(?) that I have ever seen. THAT IS WHERE OUR MONEY AS TAXPAYERS IS GOING TO - TO PAY FOR THAT UNSIGHTLY UGLY SO CALLED "FUTURISITIC ART". Who was responsible for buying that art, where did the money come from, how come us taxpayers were never notified or atleast we should have been able to vote on what art work (if any), should have been purchased.

Sometime ago, large ugly teapots were purchased and placed on top of the new wall that was constructed for the paradise valley residents to reduce the noise from the new freeway. Where are they now? They were paid for by us taxpayers, we never had a say if we wanted our tax monies going into someting so stupid. If I wanted to see oversized teapots, I would have bought a book with pictures of ALICE IN WONDERLAND!

This kind of spending of our tax dollars is uncalled for. Arizona and Jan Brewer are sayig that Arizona is in the "Red by Millions of Dollars". Take a drive down Camelback and notice the "art" sitting on 19th Ave., go down Cental Ave. and look at the "art" next to the Tram stops. But best of all, go as far as the Post Office, and look at the "art" that is displayed there. How much did this cost us taxpayers!

Everyone needs to wake up and smell the coffee. Write a letter to your council represent.; send a letter to the governor. We have homeless and jobless people that need help. Where is our humanity! How can we just ignore our own kind - kids starving, living on the streets. But we can afford to buy "junk" that someone calls "art". I truly do not know how (or whoever authorized payment for this junk) can sleep at night knowing that we have a major problem; little children going without a proper meal, mothers walking the streets downtown who are pregnant - do I need to go on?

Tear down those pieces of junk and scrap them all - Phoenix was not meant to be on the top ten best cities in the nation and put the taxpayers' monies to work for our communities!

 
Loading...