Hendershott, Thomas, and Aubuchon Want $60 Million for Their Troubles? Indictments Would Suit Them Better

SALTING LEECHES

At least Egypt's Hosni Mubarak knows when to go; Sheriff Joe, not so much.

Social Eye Media

Related Content

• Andrew Thomas Compares Himself to Gandhi and Martin Luther King in Press Conference
  April 11, 2012
• Andy Thomas Needs a Perp Walk With His Papi, Sheriff Joe Arpaio
  April 19, 2012
• Bill Montgomery Rushes to Arpaio's Aid — Just As Disbarred Predecessor Andy Thomas Used to Do
  April 12, 2012
• Federal Lawsuit Against Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Former County Attorney Andrew Thomas to Proceed; No Immunity, Judge Rules
  April 10, 2012
• Rachel Alexander Sues Maricopa County for $67,000 -- the Cost of Legal Fees for Her Appeal of Law-License Suspension; Wilcox Wins $975,000 Settlement
  May 11, 2012

More About

• Joe Arpaio
• Lisa Aubuchon
• David Hendershott
• World Politics
• U.S. State Politics

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter: Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.

Privacy Policy Cancel Continue

Getting rid of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his fellow brigands may prove more difficult than ousting Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak from power.

At least Mubarak, in the wake of massive protests, has agreed to relinquish his dictatorial hold within six months' time, ending 30 years of autocratic rule.

But Arpaio's goin' nowhere. He plans to run for re-election in 2012, when he'll be turning 80. He's amassed a fortune to help him win, with $2.8 million in cash on hand, as of his last campaign finance filing.

True, the elections that have kept Arpaio the jefe of Maricopa County, lo, these 18 years are fairer than the rigged referendums that have given cover to Mubarak's dictatorship.

So maybe it's not sporting to compare Mubarak's massive police-state apparatus to Arpaio's iron rule within the confines of this county. Still, the differences tend to be those of degree.

Arpaio's tenure in office has meant the targeting of his political enemies, the arrest and harassment of journalists (specifically the 2007 arrests of Village Voice Media Executive Editor Michael Lacey and VVM CEO Jim Larkin), and the trumping up of charges against those who oppose him.

Not to mention the deaths and injuries to jail detainees, which have cost the county more than $43 million in payouts, as well as the MCSO's massive internal corruption and abuses of power that've been the subject of several state and federal probes, some ongoing.

The apparent failure of these probes demonstrates the impotence of federal and state law enforcement to hold accountable a rogue sheriff like Arpaio.

Before this past Christmas, the rumor mill was in overdrive, and grand jury indictments were expected any week. But the federal grand jury looking into the MCSO for criminal abuse of power violations continues to be eerily silent.

The U.S. Department of Justice's two-year-long civil rights investigation into the MCSO's illegal and unconstitutional sweeps of Hispanic communities remains active.

But it's doubtful that the Obama administration will have the political will to ask a judge to do something so dramatic as putting the MCSO into receivership.

Lately, Arpaio has been cooperating with the DOJ's probe. Put your bets on a consent decree of some kind, wherein Arpaio agrees to a list of "suggestions" put forth by DOJ lawyers.

Former Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard left office last year without bringing indictments in the Sheriff's Command Association scandal. That's the one in which Joe's underlings created an illegal slush fund to smear Arpaio's 2008 Democratic opponent, Dan Saban, with a sleazy TV ad.

Why the AG's Office lacked the intestinal fortitude to go after this low-hanging fruit remains a colossal, annoying puzzler.

In September, MCSO Deputy Chief Frank Munnell's leaked bombshell memo to Arpaio outlined numerous incidents of alleged criminal wrongdoing, malfeasance, abuse of power, and outright corruption on the part of MCSO Chief Deputy David Hendershott, MCSO director Larry Black, and Captain Joel Fox.

All three are on paid leave pending the outcome of Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu's administrative investigation into the allegations. Babeu's spokesman recently told my colleague Ray Stern that a report on that investigation is coming soon — perhaps this week or next.

But even if Babeu acquires enough stones to suggest that Hendershott and the others be fired, it will not salt the leeches that continue to bleed this county white.

Witness the joint notice of claim filed on behalf of Arpaio's former fellow Sith Lord and ex-County Attorney Andrew Thomas, Thomas' fired and disgraced attack pooch, ex-Deputy County Attorney Lisa Aubuchon, and the aforementioned MCSO chief-deputy-on-leave, Hendershott.

This trio of terribles had to go all the way to Montana to find an attorney to submit this whiny, self-serving document, which seeks a total of $60 million from the county to make these bloodsuckers go away.

That's irony on a grand scale, like some Broadway musical in which the protagonist gets away with multiple homicides. (Sweeney Todd, anyone?)

Before Thomas resigned to run for Arizona attorney general — a bid thankfully brought to a halt by his rival in the GOP primary, current Attorney General Tom Horne — Thomas, along with Arpaio, Hendershott, Aubuchon, and then-Deputy County Attorney Rachel Alexander, were at war with the Board of Supervisors, the local judiciary, and anyone who crossed them.

As part of this war, Thomas, et al., ginned up charges against county supervisors Mary Rose Wilcox and Don Stapley, as well as against Superior Court Judge Gary Donahoe, all of which were later thrown out.

In 2009, in a classic jump-the-shark moment, Thomas and Arpaio filed a risible RICO suit against the supervisors, various county employees, and several Superior Court judges, alleging that they were scheming to block Arpaio and Thomas' investigations into the building of a new court tower.

Thomas and Arpaio later dismissed the suit and turned the file over to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Arizona U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke reviewed it and wrote a letter to then-County Attorney Rick Romley, stating that there was a "total lack of evidence" to justify the action.

As a result of such machinations on the part of the Thomas-Arpaio axis, their various victims have filed lawsuits and notices of claims totaling at least $56 million.