-
Brushman 04/02/2012 1:58:00 AM
To "Yuman:" Your diatribe is more an indictment of you than it is of Yuma! What have you done to try to make Yuma better? If you have lived here for 27 years and dislike Yuma so much, why haven't you hauled your butt out of here to somewhere you think is better? Even with "Checkpoint Cesar," it should be possible to make it to some other part of the US, unless you are a Mexican national here without proper U.S. papers, in which case you have no standing to criticize Yuma! As a recent transplant to Yuma, I like it here, warts and all.
-
Yuman 03/28/2012 4:21:00 PM
Great article! I have lived in this town for 27 years and let me tell you.......This town sucks! The only way to get a good job is that if you know someone. And all these old people cant drive for shit!! just stinking up the place. It should be also called Shit city!!! Because people stop here from traveling to take a shit!!
-
Senator Gordon 08/25/2011 8:12:00 PM
Wow, you two sure did take that stodgy ol' Sunset magazine to task! Good Job! Also, the rippin' on "old people": neat! Didja happen to notice the Royal Motor Inn, the Torch Lite Lodge or even the Yuma Cabana? They easily rival anything in the lodging section of "Midcentury Marvels" or that "used to exist" on Apache, E. Van Buren and the few left around Grand Ave...
Keep up the dull work.
-
doc 04/23/2011 3:59:00 AM
Not much of a biologist if you don't have the stones to spend a night in Yuma. We can talk about my graduate biology days in places like Chiapas, Honduras, and Nicaragua in the 80's...if you were afraid of Yuma then you basically need to just stay home and never ever go out again. Anywhere. Ever.
-
Doc 04/23/2011 3:54:00 AM
One more thing to think about:
If you want to see Yuma grow like a normal city then getting rid of the Stazi like Border Patrol checkpoints on Highways 8 and 95 is a must.
By putting these checkpoints so far away from the border the US Federal Government has essentially ceded Yuma to Mexico and stunted it's growth potential. The checkpoints need to be put on the roads coming in from Mexico SOUTH of Yuma, thereby giving the feeling that Yuma is once again a part of the US.
Yuma would love to attract greater numbers of creative types, artists, musicians, etc. They would love to have galleries and boutiques lining main street and major label bands playing venues in Yuma, but those things are hard to attract when people know that they have to go through militarized checkpoints to get in to and to leave Yuma.
Go to Berlin and the wall is gone, the checkpoints are empty, Checkpoint Charlie is a photo op for tourists, and you can cross all of western Europe without having to flash your passport.
Go to Yuma and you will have to go through at least one and sometimes three militarized checkpoints in any direction leaving town. All it does is bother US citizens on US highways going about their daily lives, causing delays and traffic accidents in the process. The Border Patrols real job could be easily done on the roads south of Highway 8, stopping the flow of illegals and narcotics, without harassing the citizens of the US and impeding the progress of Yuma.
-
Doc 04/23/2011 2:08:00 AM
Seriously? These two authors are hilarious. If you go out looking for a bad time you will find a bad time. Fact is that Yuma has more in common with San Diego than it will ever have in common with Phoenix. The population is getting younger, hipper, and will continue to do so. The amenities keep growing. The Fry's market in the Yuma foothills is the biggest grossing Fry's anywhere in the state! It wouldn't be unless there was something cool going on there.
Phoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale, etc...all are basically an annex of Los Angeles and enjoy all the nonsense that comes with that distinction...crime, crazy politicians, violence, etc. Tucson is, well, maybe one of the dirtiest towns in the west. Yuma, well, it's small, it's growing, and it beats the hell out of a lot of other places. Give it time and it'll have Trader Joes, art galleries, and a lot of renovations. But until then it has an international airport that lets it's residents live in the tranquility of the desert and still get to those appointments in LA and Seattle....
-
Mdennish 04/22/2011 2:18:00 AM
Yuma is a much better place now than it was 10 years ago. But after working,eating,drinking and staying in the local motels several times in the past ten years.......I find it a boring place without any good restaurants or bars or entertainment. The people that i encountered in Yuma have always been friendly and the crime in Yuma is no worse than other cities its size.. It seems to be a inexpensive place to retire or spend the winter and many of the locals seem to be happy living in Yuma.
-
Sk8_king 04/20/2011 10:13:00 PM
I lived in Yuma for a year and I have to say that this article is so spot on, it's scary. I can see spending maybe half a day there at the most. The historic hotel downtown is beautiful and has been horribly neglected. It is a shame that something that special is in such bad condition. But hey Yuma has it's new million dollar river park that is located right next to a water treatment pond! You won't see that on the Hilton website...
-
Roadkingbadboyharley 04/20/2011 9:51:00 PM
I go to yuma every year for dove hunting and the place grows on ya. The people are really nice and their is some great places to eat like the beer and burgers place. Lets not forget the best place is jack and roses steak house, see ya in sept
-
04/19/2011 7:03:00 PM
The article reads like Amy and Claire already had their minds made up before getting to Yuma. They weren't looking for the potential good but found what THEY expected.
Typical NT drivel.
-
Docbob498th 04/18/2011 3:40:00 PM
Tomato, ever notice how few words it takes to drive Herr Reich into one of his cut and paste rants. Talk about mind control.
-
Daybreak98sun 04/15/2011 2:27:00 PM
Never thought of Yuma as anything more than a place to get gas on the way to San Diego!
-
Dasbratwursthaus 04/14/2011 11:34:00 PM
Amy and Claire,
Das Bratwurst Haus is not a deli. We are a German Restaurant with a full German menu. I wish you had stopped in for lunch or dinner. You would have enjoyed it. Maybe another time.
-
Mchaleystephanie 04/13/2011 9:33:00 AM
I've lived in Yuma for 35 years. Are there a lot of old people in Yuma? Yes, but by the end of March a large majority of them go home. Alot of the people who come to Yuma to retire were military people who served here at one time, These people liked it here so much they came back. What keeps people coming back to Yuma? It's the people. Yuma has some of the warmest most friendly people you will ever meet. I work nights at Shadows Lounge (considered a dive by some), In area of the city called Okie Town. It is one of the poorer neighborhoods in town, I have never had a problem. Neither do the many people walking around town at night, I would take the crime rate here over anyplace like Phoenix or Los Angeles. Yuma is not perfect. We have crime and drugs like any city, but we resent being called an armpit. Try spending more than a few hours here before you cut us down.
-
04/12/2011 9:26:00 PM
Seriously commenters? The best way to discourage tourists from visiting Arizona is to embellish a city's attractions. Yuma has come a long way; that's very true. But let's take a moment to reflect upon where it started from.....you getting the picture yet?
Just because a place has improved doesn't make it a desirable place to visit. I'm sure it's a nice enough place to live. However, I would be p%ssed if I took a day to visit Yuma and I found nothing outstanding there. Imagine dragging kids there? No way. The authors aren't saying Yuma sucks all around. I didn't get that at all. They are saying that if you're thinking about taking your family on a SIX hour (round trip) drive to go to Lutes, then think again.
-
Adancrgurl2011 04/12/2011 8:09:00 PM
Excuse me? I was born and raised in Yuma. I find your comment and this article offensive. What kind of atomosphere are we displaying to you? Yes there are dangerous parts of Yuma but every town as a bad part of it! Sorry we don't have high priced food to blow your money on. Apparently you aren't smart enough to mapquest or find the right places of Yuma on your own. Get to know Yuma through a real Yuman.
-
Wayne Michael Reich 04/06/2011 7:39:00 AM
I hear crickets.....
-
DiverDan 04/04/2011 8:05:00 PM
If you like dive bars, don't miss Jimmy Dee's!
-
LFSeabrooke 04/01/2011 6:14:00 PM
I have been traveling to/from Yuma for almost two decades and I can tell you that the city has come a long way. In addition, historical sites represent "destinations" for many travelers and Yuma's history with its territorial prison definitely fits that description. In addition, I am bothered the fact that a journalist in Arizona would try to turn something positive (i.e. potential tourist dollars and positive press) into a negative. The state of Arizona needs money badly and anything postitive in terms of press is a good thing. Why would you try to portray the 3rd-most populous area in Arizona negatively given the current economic circumstances? The article was very shortsided.
-
Erica Kelly 04/01/2011 4:30:00 AM
Wow! How is it that you have such a strong opinion about a city by visiting for one day?
-
sonoran12 03/31/2011 9:54:00 PM
Oh, be nice to Yuma. They've come a long way and encounter many obstacles. I'll admit that I wouldn't send anyone there as a tourist destination, but people live there. It's a lifestyle: low cost of living, desert, dunes, beautiful rivers and lakes, mexico, san diego. If you like those sorts of things - you might like Yuma. If you don't, keep driving. Like Phoenix is that great?
(btw: I love going to Lutes and Red's. Greatest dive bars - if you like that sort of thing. Otherwise, you'll be more comfortable in Scottsdale.)
-
pressrelease? 03/31/2011 6:35:00 AM
Sounds believable to me.
-
Gagoo7 03/31/2011 5:28:00 AM
please keep your hipster asses i out of Yuma go drink some over priced wine eat some over priced food and follow what ever trend your currently following to fill in
-
Jerry Feldner 03/30/2011 11:05:00 PM
I've been to Yuma many, many times. I spent a lot of time in the desert west of Yuma when I was doing studies in college (UCLA) and again years later when I was accompanied by my son, a budding biologist.
Never have I had the guts to spend a night there. We would often get fast food at one of the restaurants just off the freeway but camp out in the desert to avoid the atmosphere (if you can call it that) in Yuma.
Your article is 100 percent true, and while I haven't read the articles in the magazines/papers you mentioned, I can only believe Phoenix New Times is telling the truth, from my experience.
Jerry Feldner, Tempe
-
Max henry 03/30/2011 11:04:00 PM
WOW! I just read, for the 5th time, your "A Sense of Yuma" trashing of the city of Yuma, AZ. I tried to find some untruths or at least some exaggerations in your article but found none; I hoped to write a rebuttal but you left me no mistakes to challenge, no ammunition to fire back with. I feel defensive and disappointed for many reasons but most of all because I am OLD, lived in Yuma for 11 years and all 4 of my children were born there. I suppose all I can say is the old cliche, "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder". I didn't read any of those articles portraying Yuma as the "it city" so I really don't know what you had expected to find there. I do know that I would not reccomend Lutes Casino or Main Street as "must see" attractions. The best thing Yuma has going for it is the mild winter weather, therefore all the old people from Minnesota, the Dakotas and Canada. (All those RVs). I could name two Mexican restaurants that are the best in the world but I would not want you to go back and then trash them. The Quechan and Cocopah tribes own/operate resort/casinos that are equal to any in the Salt or Gila River valleys; however, they are full of old people! If you enjoy authentic Mexican or Indian culture/history, Yuma is a gem. Undocumented Mexicans might even outnumber the old people. (I love it). There are more Cocopah and Quechan Indians today than any other time in history. (I love it). Yuma offers some of the world's best bass fishing along with all popular water sports at Martinez Lake. The sand dunes across the river provide the best off-roading anywhere. I can't really think of anything that would attract those "hipsters" you mentioned. Now, about the "scent of old people". That hurt for two reasons: One, I am 74. Two, I am a longtime fan of your talent/work and never dreamed that you are so mean spirited. I've really thought a lot about the smell of old people; today I took a second shower and slapped on a double dose of Old Spice. I have no idea if that can mask the old person smell or not. I remember when as a little boy I hated it when my great-grandmother would hug me, partly because of her smell, partly because it just wasn't cool. I didn't associate her odor with age, I thought it had to do more with her lack of running water in her home and the fact that she smoked a pipe and chewed tobacco. Now, 70 years later, you have me wondering. Maybe a question for Clay Thompson? Those "deserted slums" are my old barrio, dear to my heart but certainly nothing to attract tourists. O.K., I've had my say: "Different strokes for different folks!".
Max Henry
P.S. I just learned to e-mail and have nothing better to be doing.
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/30/2011 10:08:00 PM
Thanks Doc- I accept your limited apology.
I'm genuinely touched.
You can keep saying what you want about me- no matter how much you repeat it, your slander won't stick.
Ever.
So best of luck coming up with another slur comprised of ether and air.
My condolences also extend to the disorder that causes you without merit of proof to slander indiscriminately and inaccurately- it must really suck to be you.
As to laying off the Ding Dongs, you're probably right.
Looking at what all that sugar has done to you is giving me serious pause.
Wayne Michael Reich
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.blogspot.com
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/30/2011 9:43:00 PM
Actually I do- the proof is in the fact I keep trying to debate, and cowardly trolls such as yourself keep attempting to deflect the issue from their anonymous perches.
Note that I said "attempting".
So....
Are you here to debate the issues I've raised, or will you just continue to hide under the anonymous skirt of the Interweb?
Logic (which you are such a fan of) says you'll continue to compose weak insults, offer accusations, and continue to duck the issue- while bringing nothing of substance to the metaphorical table.
Care to lay a wager on who's correct?
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Docbob498th 03/30/2011 5:01:00 PM
I apologize for calling you a tweaker. You are obviously a Bi-Polar in a manic state, hence the delusional thought process and grandiosity. ( you might want to lay off the ding-dongs as the sugar can exacerbate your condition)
-
Docbob498th 03/30/2011 4:53:00 PM
Sorry, it just amuses me, oh,and you obviously don't know what the study of logic entails.
-
Docbob498th 03/30/2011 4:50:00 PM
Do them or are one?
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/29/2011 1:54:00 AM
It's called Logic, Docbob498th.
I can see why it confuses and enrages you.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/29/2011 1:48:00 AM
Actually, Docbob498th.
I do have "eyes and ears" inside NT- Amy's employees have been sending me info for a while now, so I can't fathom why you regard that as paranoia.
Amy is the one that should be paranoid, and from what her peeps tell me- she is.
What I DO find interesting is that you have left a comment (of sorts) on almost every one of my responses.
(pretty standard for a stalker)
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.blogspot.com
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/29/2011 1:39:00 AM
LOL!
That's actually funny.
Well played, old man.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/29/2011 1:37:00 AM
Sorry if my post was confusing to you Docbob498th- we all know that Tolstoy was the author of War and Peace..
The Bradbury reference was a analogy to someone who writes very succinct chapters in his books, which I love.
BTW, I don't do Meth.
I do Ding Dongs.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/29/2011 1:32:00 AM
Geez Tomato- I'm starting to think this is getting to be a personal thing with you.
So once again let's play, shall we?
"Get a load of this: Wayne now thinks New Times doesn't criticize Phoenix."
Can I borrow whatever drug you're currently doing? Anyone with a brain knows this statement is patently false. All the people reading have to do is go down a few responses and follow the links I've posted that show you're fabricating this out of thin air.
"What rock have you been living under?"
Oh you'd like it- it's all glittery and stuff, and the view is amazing.
"That paper is infamous to going after Phoenix, in every way imaginable."
Um yeah- I've kind of have been saying that for months now. Thanks for coming to the party, but you're sort of late. And you forgot the beer. Again.
"That's what the press does, you ninny."
Um, no. The Press is supposed to inform, enlighten, and sometimes- entertain. Going after easy targets doesn't strike me as true journalism, especially when both writers obviously didn't bother to do the merest of research.
"And I note that Wayne thinks that anybody who criticizes HIM has got to be the same person, while eschewing any hint that he may be writing under assumed names to further his vendetta against NT."
Considering you posted as "Ted" first, then "Tomato"- I consider this statement somewhat hypocritical. And the true meaning of vendetta requires bloodletting, which seems somewhat extreme to me.
"Getting lost in all this is: He started the whole flap by riling up the Yuma populace -- when he admits he's never been there."
Wow. I started all this?
Right.
It couldn't possibly have had anything to do with Amy's article.
Not a chance, says I.
With all due respect, Yuma was pretty riled up about the original blog before I came along, and if you've had been paying attention you would have noticed that I was invited to Yuma by the Media Director of the Yuma Tourist board, and I look forward to going.
"Becoming obvious in all this is: Wow, a lot of people can't stand this blowhard. A lot!"
Once again, you're right on the money. Fortunately, I have a lot more people who do support me with a much firmer grasp on grammar and reality than you.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/29/2011 12:57:00 AM
Tomato- you have no idea how much I've missed you.
So let's get down to brass tacks.
"Dear disappointed former fan, so effin' what?!"
Dear Tomato, why do you effin' care?
"Only New Times and Sunset Magazine hardly are competitors'
This is true. Nice grammar BTW, Sunset has professional journalists, New Times has journalism school hacks.
"What the paper obviously had a problem with was Sunset's and other publications' depictions of Yuma as a garden spot."
And yet- rather that go after Sunset's depiction, they went after Yuma with a literary hatchet. I see personal pettiness, not a professional overview regarding this article.
And many others share my opinion, whether you like it or not.
"That's total bullshit"
I couldn't agree more.
"and Amy Silverman and Claire Lawton called BS on these stupid travel articles."
Then why didn't they go after any other articles that Sunset previously wrote?
"Hey, are you Wayne's girlfriend, or possibly even Wayne?"
No such luck, my sassy Tomato. I really do enjoy how every time anyone defends my position, you claim the writer MUST be me. As much as I enjoy this one sided repartee, I don't really devote more than five minutes or so responding to one of your asinine rants.
It's obvious you have a personal axe to grind- it's a shame you're not man enough to shoulder it.
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Tomato 03/28/2011 11:04:00 PM
Dear disappointed former fan, so effin' what?! Only New Times and Sunset Magazine hardly are competitors. What the paper obviously had a problem with was Sunset's and other publications' depictions of Yuma as a garden spot. That's total bullshit, and Amy Silverman and Claire Lawton called BS on these stupid travel articles. Hey, are you Wayne's girlfriend, or possibly even Wayne?
-
disappointed former-fan 03/28/2011 9:11:00 PM
it's not even about "giving the town a break" it's about being a legitimate reporter. They didn't scour the city, they visited antique shops. they did no research. The editor said himself "Our issue is not with Yuma, but with Sunset Magazine. Yuma is what it is"
-
Docbob498th 03/28/2011 8:54:00 PM
You have "eyes and ears" inside NT? The paranoia is coming out, not to mention the delusions.(pretty standard for a tweaker)
-
Docbob498th 03/28/2011 8:49:00 PM
"He's eloquent?" You must have been educated in Az.
-
Docbob498th 03/28/2011 8:46:00 PM
Don't fart too hard, you can,t afford to lose the brain cells.
-
Docbob498th 03/28/2011 8:42:00 PM
If you're not standing out front, it won't
-
Docbob498th 03/28/2011 8:39:00 PM
Talk about a disorganized thought process.
-
Docbob498th 03/28/2011 8:35:00 PM
Wayne, You must have some REALLY potent meth. BTW, I didn't know Ray Bradbury wrote "War and Peace."
-
Tomato 03/28/2011 7:27:00 PM
Get a load of this: Wayne now thinks New Times doesn't criticize Phoenix. What rock have you been living under? That paper is infamous to going after Phoenix, in every way imaginable. That's what the press does, you ninny. And I note that Wayne thinks that anybody who criticizes HIM has got to be the same person, while eschewing any hint that he may be writing under assumed names to further his vendetta against NT.
Getting lost in all this is: He started the whole flap by riling up the Yuma populace -- when he admits he's never been there.
Becoming obvious in all this is: Wow, a lot of people can't stand this blowhard. A lot!
-
Ghostthelegend 03/28/2011 5:53:00 PM
i have lived in yuma for 12 years and read your blog and totally agree with you. i am especially concerned foe the way our historic sites have been amanaged by the city, taking them away from their historic value and destroying the grounds. yuma's problem is lack of education,professional management skills,lack of professional reserch on items,and lack of creativity.
-
disappointed former-fan 03/28/2011 2:13:00 PM
this story was only a pathetic attempt for the New Times to "get back" at their competition. The writers went in with predetermined notions, and left after looking in to nothing. New Times is such a joke. I'd rather read Faux news, at least when they bs, it's not so petty
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/28/2011 8:40:00 AM
123-
The Phoenix and Tucson markets contribute advertising dollars.
You don't attack the golden calf, you know.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/28/2011 8:08:00 AM
Hi there Artchick666!
As I am also known as the "Artbitch", let me commend you on picking a sexily excellent Internet moniker this time around.
In typical Artbitch fashion, let me retort.
"Talk about pot calling the kettle black: "Thou doth protest too much, methinks."
As do you, I'm afraid. How many anonymous replies have you posted so far? And don't use the "this is my first response" excuse, especially when we all know that's not true.
"Come on, Reich, you have written the insane/stupid version of War and Peace here."
Have you ever actually read War and Peace? I have, and it's way wordier than anything I've ever written. 460,000 words, to be exact. I average about 2500 give or take- so I apologize for not writing like Ray Bradbury.
If you have an issue with what I've said or stated publicly that has compelled you to to complain, I'd have to ask why you would not address the issues that I have queried about.
To make it easier for readers to see where I was coming from, without having to read my novellas/rants/blogs/magnum opuses, I asked four simple questions:
On a consistent basis:
1) does New Times help or hinder the perception of PHX?
2) does New Times mock or praise the positive aspects of PHX?
3) does New Times delivered quality writing over the last year?
4) does New Times actually listen to it's readers or dismiss them?
These appear on the surface to be simple to answer one way or the other, yet for some odd reason, anonymous snipes such as yourself seem to be unable to do so.
You disagree with me.
That's great! It really is.
Prove your point with actual facts and/or logic.
(It's sometimes referred to as "Debating" by mature adults)
or shut the heck up.
If you can't, please feel free to contact me at Wayne@WayneMichaelReich.com, and I give you my word that I will continue this back and forth repartee.
Don't worry about wasting my time- the five minutes it takes me to fire off one of these responses will be all yours.
"I don't have a dog in this fight,"
I DO appreciate that, as I hate cleaning up after them. However if you are indeed, an "Artchick", one would tend to think that helping the PHX art scene would be important to you. So I guess it's just a cute nickname without any actual meaning, then.
"but you come across as, a couple of people have said, "unbalanced:" in your rants."
That's the beauty of free speech- you can think I'm unbalanced, and the 124 Emails I have received in the last two weeks can praise what I've been writing/doing so far.
Who has more pull with me, do you think?
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
BTW- There are 489 words in this response, so I’m a tad shy of “War and Peace Pt.2”. I'm afraid.
-
123 03/28/2011 7:35:00 AM
With all the nonsense coming out of the state Capitol these days, was this article really the best use of this periodical's resources? Give the town a break. Phoenix and Tucson are bland armpits too, compared to NYC and Los Angeles.
-
Grinchman007 03/28/2011 7:06:00 AM
scottsdale is a big nothing in the middle of nowhere, yuma is the hub and it will explode
when the colonette becomes the next long beach
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/28/2011 7:06:00 AM
First: My sincerest apologies to all the New Times readers who've watched this forum be littered with asinine comments left by anonymous cowards with a personal axe to grind.
I was hoping for mature debate about the issues I've raised, but I see that character and intelligence has gone the way of Vanilla Ice.
Now, getting back to unfortunate business...
In response to this obviously well-educated and witty person, all I can say is this:
"You are the kind of person that I would use as a blueprint to build an idiot."
If you have any further short bus ramblings, please feel free to contact me at Wayne@WayneMichaelReich.com, when you actually grow and/or borrow a set.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Einsteen 03/28/2011 6:38:00 AM
WMR Squared = Pie R Arttard
-
Artchick666 03/28/2011 1:17:00 AM
Talk about pot calling the kettle black: "Thou doth protest too much, methinks." Come on, Reich, you have written the insane/stupid version of War and Peace here. I don't have a dog in this fight, but you come across as, a couple of people have said, "unbalanced:" in your rants..
-
arcadialegos77 03/27/2011 11:10:00 PM
FYI: hit up exit #16 (about 1.5m before AZ/CA lines) - cheaper gas, mcdonalds, & great odds are you'll see someone you know @ the gas station's Blimpie. other then that? ...um yeah, i got nothin - stay classy, yuma..
-
77clearlegos. 03/27/2011 11:06:00 PM
FYI: hit up exit #16 before enroute cali, about a mile up - cheaper gas, mcdonalds, & great odds are you'll see someone you know @ the gas station's Blimpie. stay classy, yuma...
-
Yuma Resident 03/27/2011 12:53:00 PM
Please kindly go fuck yourself you useless, racist, pile of space wasting shit.
-
03/26/2011 5:12:00 PM
To the authors: There is something personal going on here. Obviously you either have never really been to Yuma and you had to write a controversial article on a city you didn't have time or interest enough to visit, or you got arrested there for something like drunk driving or for leaving your babies in the car with the windows rolled up.
-
03/26/2011 11:04:00 AM
Hi Wayne,
Just stopped by to see the comment count...that, and the new quote...it...just wow!
I think they've officially run out of feet.
Also, they need to stop this crazy thing before the trolls evolve into their own new class of proto-being fueled by pure, anonymous internet hate.
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/26/2011 9:59:00 AM
Wow.
Nothing says "logical debate" like a rambling discourse form an unhinged mind.
Did somebody skip their meds today?
This may be the most pointlessly asinine post I've read so far- you could be a NT Editor with mad skills like this.
Addressing the point of your foaming at the mouth diatribe, I ask this:
If I'm so insignificant, why would you even bother to respond?
Thou doth protest too much, methinks.
Save your breath...You'll need it to blow up your date.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Todd Nelson 03/26/2011 9:33:00 AM
Wayne (yikes, that name gives me the shivers), you are truly pathetic. Give it a rest. Nobody believes you. You are a joke. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!! So stupid, such a pitiful retard. You know nothing! You are a player hater. You will never be a player mofo, you will never matter. You suck as an artist. New Times will never recognize you. Quit trying to get its attention. You are in love with NT; it's obvious. It's truly making everybody sick. Wretch!!!!!! Stop it, you little, insignificant twit. Go away! Please. Stop coughing up hairballs that nobody believes. You've never even been to Yuma, fool! This is all about going after New Times because it won't love you. Won't even notice you. Awwwwww. Poor little boo boo. Get a life. You have none. You only exist to hate New Times. Pitiful idiot.
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/26/2011 8:23:00 AM
link:http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/entertainment/travel/yuma-travel-destination-3-23-2011
"Our issue is with Sunset Magazine, not Yuma. Yuma is what it is. While it might be a nice place to live, we haven't ever viewed it as a tourist destination and after visiting last week, we still don't." - Claire Lawton and Amy Silverman, Phoenix New Times"
I see the spin cycle is running.
So why didn't you write your review about Sunset Magazine then, Amy & Claire?
Was it because they would fight back?
just curious,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/26/2011 7:57:00 AM
[As a disclaimer, I have to point out that you really can’t take advice from an anonymous cyber coward named “Tomato”]
“Since you asked, Wayne, I have no problem with New Times. It's a good newspaper in a journalistic wasteland.”
-When your answer reads like a press release, it just has to be genuine, right?
“It's the only thing between us and the rednecks and (in your case) mediocre artists that dominate this landscape.”
- You forgot to mention Zombies. Luckily they don’t read this paper, so we still have time to come up with a plan.
“What you're really mad about it that your art sucks.”
- No, what I’m really mad about is bad grammar, inaccurate reporting, and outright lies, wrapped in a shell of high school journalism.
“I've looked at it.”
- No wonder I feel dirty all over.
“Which is probably why you haven't gotten the time of day from NT. "Oh, if New Times would only love my snapshots!?"
-Actually, there was a time when they really did:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2006-11-23/news/tear-down-town/1/
my work is featured throughout the article, but like all ex girlfriends- they forget the good times that we had together. It's sad, really.
“Anyway, what makes a failed artist (my opinon, but I'm entitled to it)”
-Yes you are entitled to your opinion, but since I’ve had over 150 shows, my work displayed in PHX City Hall, and was featured in two documentaries, [one of which won several awards] plus the small fact of having been a PHX based working artist for the last two decades- I’m thinking the only "failure" here is your attempt to prove a point.
“any expert on whether a newspaper is any good?”
-Fair question. I have never said I was an expert, but I am someone who remembers when this paper was respected in the community and as such, I have the right to protest what I see as a slow descent into hack journalism, and you have the right to disagree with me.
Preferably through logical debate. Or juvenile name calling. Your choice.
“You should just zip it,”
- Thanks, I thought I felt a draft.
“though I doubt you are emotionally able to stop spewing,”
- I blame my parents. But then again, I blame yours too.
“because people (at least anybody but these pathetic Yumans) are laughing at you.”
- Or with me- it can go either way, you know.
Maybe, meds would help. Just saying...
- That’s a great idea. Let me know when you need a ride home from the Methadone clinic, and I’ll call you a cab.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/26/2011 6:58:00 AM
Mrs. Craig-
One day soon, I am buying you lunch.
Hopefully at a place that doesn't have a giant clown out front.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com
-
Lauren Craig 03/26/2011 3:09:00 AM
You obviously do not do your homework yourself, Alvin, and as far as Mr. Reich using other identities, if you read articles written by Amy and her husband, Ray Stern you will find the uncanny use of the same frequent phrases as many of the one-name, profileless 'commentators' who always appear very late on these comment threads to defend them. Mr. Stern has been the subject of numerous complaints of racism and inappropriate public behavior. This is an inescapable irony if you consider the fact that he made such a ruckus about his 'showdown with the racist sheriff' yet he himself had to apologize, in print, for running a cartoon that depicted racist profiling, stereotyped behavior of minorities and rape as the target content of its 'joke'. Amy Silverman had this article written on her and the New Times by a significant source, which was actually picked up by AP syndication, and makes several points quite clear as to Amy's own apparent hatemongering bias and lack of journalistic integrity or professionalism which is what the people of Arizona are taking issue against this couple and their pseudo-newspaper for.
https://iusbvision.wordpress.com/2011/01/17/washington-post-publishes-stereotype-laden-hate-filled-screed-against-the-people-of-arizona/
I would also like to make the point that there is a growing number of us whose families own homes and business interests in these parts of Arizona that are consistently under attack by the New Times. I personally volunteer at several social service organizations that are trying to improve things and provide assistance to individuals, families, businesses and charities impacted by the economy. Some of us who are looking into legal action against the New Times for it, in fact, as it is unfairly hurting the economy with false and negative claims (a reporter doing a negative feature piece on an event that she did not even attend, and lied about what was at that event and posted pictures 'of' the event which were not is only one of the most recent examples). This consistent pattern of behavior is causing us to question this couple's and the New Times real agenda towards Arizona and what other business interests are tied to the Times that might profit from such attacks.
While I sympathize with the Silverman family for having a disabled child that causes challenges to mother's schedule that seem to effect her being able to be a better associate editor/journalist, it does not excuse her taking it out on others nor any of these people not removing themselves from the media arena so that others who would do a better job could take over and actually boost the Arizona people and economy.
~Lauren Craig, AZ property owner and United Way social work volunteer
-
Esai used to live in Yuma 03/26/2011 2:23:00 AM
Besides the terrible reporting, insults, and errors in facts. How the hell do you write an article talking shit about a town without talking to some of the residents and seeing what there is to do there that's not included in an article by someone who's not residing in Yuma?? Furthermore, basing your whole Yuma experience on downtown is like bringing someone to Guadalupe and saying "So how do you like Phoenix so far?" I lived in Yuma for 16 years and sure, after living here in Phoenix, I don't see myself going back, but I still visit and have fun with my friends at the local mall, bars, block parties, festivals, county fair, flea markets, the river.. etc.
And like many people here have said: Yuma IS NOT Phoenix!! Seriously, what were you expecting????
-
Shayle 03/25/2011 11:06:00 PM
lol..I happen to live in this armpit, (not sure why). You shouldve stopped into the saloon next to Lute's Casino,'Red's Bird Cage". It used to be a brothel, (kinda still smells like one).At least you couldve said you been to an old whore house and had a beer. Other than that, you pretty much pegged Yuma for what it is worth. Thanks for setting the record straight. And your right about the old folks in RVs, the only time they drive over 25 mph is in a casino parkinglot or walmart then they do bout 60.
-
Tomato 03/25/2011 9:12:00 PM
Since you asked, Wayne, I have no problem with New Times. It's a good newspaper in a journalistic wasteland. It's the only thing between us and the rednecks and (in your case) mediocre artists that dominate this landscape. What you're really mad about it that your art sucks. I've looked at it. Which is probably why you haven't gotten the time of day from NT. "Oh, if New Times would only love my snapshots!?" Anyway, what makes a failed artist (my opinon, but I'm entitled to it) any expert on whether a newspaper is any good? You should just zip it, though I doubt you are emotionally able to stop spewing, because people (at least anybody but these pathetic Yumans) are laughing at you. Maybe, meds would help. Just saying...
-
Usgovfail 03/25/2011 8:34:00 PM
If I wanted to hear your opinion I would fart.
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/25/2011 8:28:00 PM
Thanks Tomato!
You prove mine by not addressing the actual issues at hand, which are thus
What do you think of this article and the quality of the writing at New Times?
is either any good?
I only ask, because that's the real story here, not me or my literary length.
There. I kept it short.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://www.waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.com
-
Flatlander 03/25/2011 7:27:00 PM
As a person from a small town in Arizona, I find the Yuma article offensive. I enjoy the small town atmosphere. I enjoy being able to be at the river in 20 minutes. I enjoy being able to cook a steak in the desert on a mesquite fire and not see anyone for days if I want. I enjoy being able to be at the beach in Mexico in 90 minutes or on Mission Beach in a little over two hours. I enjoy clean air, friendly people, and not having people here who think they are better simply because they have an address in Scottsdale.
-
Flatlander 03/25/2011 7:09:00 PM
Grijalva loses the election in Yuma every time. We just don't have the votes to counter all of those in south Tucson, which he actually represents, when he isn't representing Mexico.
-
Tomato 03/25/2011 6:12:00 PM
Reich proves Aubrey's point with his long, defensive rant. Funny.
-
Jacques-Andre Istel 03/25/2011 5:34:00 PM
Dear Phoenix New Times:
Your recent and fortunately forgettable article about Yuma emphasized your lack of research.
An important international chemical company is NOT a “law firm”.
In keeping with your record, we look forward to your forthcoming guide of New York City with your assumed description of the Waldorf Astoria hotel as a “hot dog stand”.
Sincerely,
Jacques-Andre Istel
www.historyingranite.org
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/25/2011 9:22:00 AM
Alvin-
You really, really want to be right- don't you?
I can tell, and I really, really want to help.
However, I may have to poke a few holes in your theories of Trolling 101, so let's start.
"Well, maybe WMR doesn't have half the posts, but he has half the number of words on these comments (check out the original blog on Yuma), because he rants on and on and with almost every post"
Glad you're keeping score on my posting, but I'm so sorry that a long paragraph fails to hold your attention. Somehow, I'm fairly certain that I won't lose any sleep over it. I also like how while admitting you were just flat dead wrong, you still manage to rationalize disseminating the wrong information.
If there is an up side to all this, an intelligent conversation with you must clock in way under thirty seconds.
"My guess is that anybody who's ripping on Amy Silverman or who is defending WMR to the hilt is really WMR."
So I wrote all 301 responses to the original post, then?
Man- I am one prolific cat.
With all due respect, I have a career and a life that surprisingly takes up most of my day, and while it is true that it only takes five minutes or so for me to fire off one of my "rants" [as you put it] I really don't have that much free time on my hands.
While I would love to have my own Wayne Clone Army, I'd like to think that I would utilize them in a much more useful fashion than responding to trolls like yourself.
To suggest that because someone defends my POV or criticizes Amy they have to be me, gives rise to serious thought about how many tin foil hats you own to keep out the mind reader rays from space.
My guess is "lots".
Feel free to E-mail me at wayne@waynemichaelreich.com with any future crackpot theories, "Alvin"- when you're done hiding under the skirts of the Internet, that is.
And using your logic, why else would you defend Amy unless you were......
Shall we call a duck a duck?
"Why would anybody else have such an unbalanced hatred for a mere writer."
It's called doing some research Alvin, and then you could stop asking this particular question again, and again, and....you get my point. And she's actually the Managing Editor, which is a little more important I think.
"And he has proof that New Times has slacked why?"
It's called doing some research Alvin, and then you could stop asking this particular question again, and again, and....you get my point. Oh wait- I said this already.
"Because it did a blog about how Yuma sucks, which it absolutely does. As for Yuma, I know it well. I've spent way more time there than i'd like, and I know that what Silverman et al. wrote is mild criticism. I would have been much harsher."
Call me crazy, but I'm getting this feeling you sort of don't like the place. It's subtle, but it's there.
"Made the trip from my place in Tempe to visit relatives more times than I can count."
Don't worry, I'm sure they did. And always with a heavy heart.
"So go peddle your "Yuma is great" crap to people who don't know better, like the Wyoming writer who wrote that tripe for Sunset, or the idiots at the Chicago Tribune, who would think anyplace was Paris compared to their Artic Circle town."
So to recap, you hate: Me, my imaginary team of Wayne clone writing defenders,Yuma, possibly Wyoming, Sunset magazine, and the Chicago Tribune.
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://waynemichaelreich.blogspot.com/
http://www.waynemichaelreich.com/
-
Alvin Aubrey 03/25/2011 8:12:00 AM
Well, maybe WMR doesn't have half the posts, but he has half the number of words on these comments (check out the original blog on Yuma), because he rants on and on and with almost every post. Also, lots of other posts are obviously from him, under phony names. Like probably yours, justanaveraereich. My guess is that anybody who's ripping on Amy Silverman or who is defending WMR to the hilt is really WMR. Why would anybody else have such an unbalanced hatred for a mere writer. And he has proof that New Times has slacked why? Because it did a blog about how Yuma sucks, which it absolutely does. As for Yuma, I know it well. I've spent way more time there than i'd like, and I know that what Silverman et al. wrote is mild criticism. I would have been much harsher. Made the trip from my place in Tempe to visit relatives more times than I can count. So go peddle your "Yuma is great" crap to people who don't know better, like the Wyoming writer who wrote that tripe for Sunset, or the idiots at the Chicago Tribune, who would think anyplace was Paris compared to their Artic Circle town.
-
justanaverageguy 03/25/2011 7:32:00 AM
Alvin.
so people aren't allowed to defend their home town, and if they do, they are hayseeds? wow. thank god you're here to tell us all what to think. and since im thinking, id like to point out a few misconceptions in your half baked rant.
the truth about yuma is that it is a town just like any other town, with both good and bad qualities. ive been there 4 times myself and while it isn't the best place ive ever visited, it certainly ain't the worst by a long shot. there are many towns that have that title locked up. and the hayseeds as you call them appear to be very nice there.
one other thing ive noticed on this board is the amount of venom being thrown at WMR which reeks of personal animosity and not by any actual problems with what he has said.
you heard it from "somebody" that "half" the posts on the original post are from WMR, this is not only disingenuous- it is an outright lie. there are 301 postings currently as far as i can read, only seven appear to be from WMR, some in response to other postings.
so when exactly did seven become half of 300? my calculator tells me that 150 is half of 300 unless you're doing base8 math that is. so you are only off by 143, that is close enough i guess in your opinion.
to help you draw your own conclusion, i copied the link:http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/jackalope/2011/03/a_sense_of_yuma.php
speaking of linking, i went further a few days ago and actually clicked some that he had posted to see why he was so down on new times, and came away better informed. i don't agree with his tone as he is kinda sarcastic, but no where did i see any evidence of a stalker. i did see new times hoisted on their own sword a couple of times using their own words against them, though. it is oddly suspect that you regard his critiques as stalking when there has been no implied or direct threats. he doesn't like how their quality has slid, has proof to back up his opinions, and i have to agree somewhat. if you are going to use such language that could be considered libel/slander i would ask you to provide actual proof rather than what you read on a public forum.
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/25/2011 5:05:00 AM
Tony-
Last time I checked, I didn't ask you [personally] to click on any of my links.
Free will- it is indeed a wonderful thing.
I have been encouraging open discussion about the issues I've (and many others) have raised, but instead the topic has been routinely hijacked by anonymous commentators sniping at me.
Is that your intention as well?
Deflection of the real issue?
You don't have to agree with my opinion, nor do you have to like my method of spreading my message- this article isn't about me. It is however, a symptom of what I've been railing about.
Your solution to not read NT does make sense for the average reader.
However...
If you are going to bill yourself as a "culture blog", logic would dictate that you would actually write about it competently. Do they do that?
As a working artist in PHX, there are virtually no publications that address the PHX art scene that impart a substantial economic impact, and that's a problem.
We have to eat and pay bills just like you, and this publication hurts us, AZ., and our communities, as evidenced by the vicious article above.
Are we not allowed to complain? I think we are.
Balance allows You to ignore us or respond with your own opinion.
You say I'm trolling- have your thought, however misguided it may be. You can do your research or you can attempt to insult me- either way, I'm still going to be ok.
The E-mail I've been receiving regarding this issue has been roughly 6 to 1 in my favor, so just because a few detractors want to talk smack, I'm okay with the position I've taken.
You call me a "hater".
That's fair, coming from your limited, non researched over-view.
But coming from mine, you're just an ineffectual troll who hides in cyberspace.
respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.blogspot.com.
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.com
-
Eric 03/25/2011 3:19:00 AM
Tell you what, Usgovfail (IF that IS your REAL name...) if I want to hear YOUR opinion, I'll just jam my hand up your ass and operate your mouth like a hand puppet.
Thank you. You may now return to your regularly scheduled programming.
-
Usgovfail 03/24/2011 11:57:00 PM
YOU are the idiot. The guy was referring to I10 in tucson or phoenix as it is near civilization. Retard. Go eat some more chillies laced with pcp.
-
Usgovfail 03/24/2011 11:55:00 PM
Yeah I'm sure. Tons of great restaurants with illegal mexicans that don't wash their hands after taking a shit cooking your food, and housekeeper maids that turn down your bed just after they ransacked your suitcase looking for whatever they want because they feel they are entitled to a better life at someone elses expense thanks to trash like harry reid, nancy pelosi and raul grijalva. Fk yuma and fk you.
-
Usgovfail 03/24/2011 11:52:00 PM
Yuma is a fucking armpit, they have that pile of shit traitor raul boycott grijalva representing them. Criminal haven sucking taxpayer money right out of our pockets like a vacuum cleaner. Oh I'm sure they all just want better lives. *spit* Low class leeching no dignity cowards.
-
Alvin Aubrey 03/24/2011 11:47:00 PM
I find it really funny that when New Times actually tells the truth about a shithole like Yuma, all the denizens prove the paper's point by squealing like little girls about how great their little corner of hell really is. Come on, people, we're talking about Yuma, here! This all proves that people stupid enough to live there are stupid enough to defend their rectum of a town to the very death. And these hayseeds actually think Phoenix New Times gives a crap about what they think. They're playing right into New Times' hands by making such a stink of it all. And who is this Wayne Michael "Third-Grader" Reich. If I were Amy Silverman, I would hire some protection, because this stalker is obviously unbalanced as hell. As somebody noted, half the posts on this and the other blog on Yuma are from him. Scary SOB.
-
Bazemorebaby2 03/24/2011 9:05:00 PM
until you live in the town...You dont know SHIT. this town actually has TONS of great lodgings places and TONS of great resturants. ask a local we would know!!!!
-
justanaveragedude 03/24/2011 8:52:00 PM
Yes they do win for their investigative reporting, which is why we're wondering why that excellence doesn't carry over to their "cultural" reporting.
There are MANY news organizations that have to produce on a daily basis, they as a rule don't insult their readers, lie, misspell, and get the basic facts wrong. This newspaper once held respect in the PHX community, and it slowly slipping away due to consistent content like this.
I'd rather not consume, Id rather be informed, enlightened, enraged or entertained.
That's what news media is supposed to do, and it doesn't have to be done in this high school journalism way.
-
Tony 03/24/2011 8:42:00 PM
There are well over 4 million people in the metro market. As such, New Times doesn't need everyone to read it. They just need 15% of the market to read it, which data shows they have. So some people hate it, some people love it. Its been that way since they began and it will be in 2099. It is what it is. But it sure seems you read a lot of it (even though Amy has run everyone out of town, as you say). Me thinks you read it and comment on it all because you are trolling for blog traffic -- which makes you just as bad as the people that work at New Times. BAD TROLL! If New Times sucks so bad, just read something else -- otherwise, your posts and hate make as much sense as wiping your ass before you take a shit. In short, take this kind of stuff in new Times as fun reading. Enjoy it and laugh at the parts that are funny to you. Take the best and forget the rest. Or just don't read it at all. Pretty simple, hater. (and BTW, I did not click on your link).
-
03/24/2011 8:42:00 PM
Ha! The Phoenix New Times constantly wins journalism awards, usually cleans up in state awards, and has been honored nationally many times. You're measuring the decades long award-winning history of this alternative newsweekly by content of dopey blog post? Like these folks, or not, they kick some fucking ass when it comes to investigative journalism. Investigations take time, unfortunately the public demand to be fed crap on a daily basis requires otherwise fine writers to dispense this type of literary pacifier. Consume it and move along.
-
Stopavoidingtheissueted 03/24/2011 8:42:00 PM
So Ted, I have a few questions for you. why is it that you seem to only attack wayne and not debate the points he has raised? if you disagree with him fine, but you appear to have a very personal issue in regards to him and him alone. while he raises valid issues to be debated, you foam at the mouth and utter childish insults rather than address the point of all this fuss, which is (quoting him)
"this reprint is nothing more than an arrogant stand against an increasingly dissatisfied readership base who has been complaining vehemently as of late, due to the lack of quality writing, inaccurate reporting, and unprovoked attacks on the people, communities and culture of Arizona."
he's eloquent, you're not. i dont see your answers to the questions wayne has asked, i do see a blatant attempt to deflect attention away from new times by picking an obviously personal fight. wayne in a past reply asked you to do your research. did you? i doubt it. and one more thing, can you do math? as far as i can tell he has seven comments posted on the original blog out of 300 that hardly comes close to half here or there. get a grip, Ted.
-
Anai 03/24/2011 8:28:00 PM
I believe they are comparing it to Phx. Afterall it is the Phx New Times. Just saying, like when they said "We yearned for downtown Mesa."
-
Eric 03/24/2011 7:37:00 PM
The author says, "we'd rather let our kids run up and down the aisles of the Target just off Interstate 10, given the deserted slums we had to navigate to finally find the park."
The author is an idiot. There IS no Interstate 10 going through Yuma. It is Interstate 8. Real basic information, I would think. If they can't even get THAT right, I don't have much faith in the rest of his shoddy article either.
-
Kathy 03/24/2011 7:02:00 PM
Hey if you think about it.. The New Times is a perfect example of why another major entertainment magazine would be a good sell in Phoenix. Using the New Times negative incentive, as a way to sell the proposition to a competitor, out for advertiser dollars, is a great idea! Especially if they employ good writers. It would be a slam dunk!
-
Kathy 03/24/2011 6:51:00 PM
My guess is you work for the New Times
-
supercoolgeek 03/24/2011 6:39:00 PM
This opiniopn article is just another reason The New Times isnt taken seriously.
-
Ted Seift 03/24/2011 5:43:00 PM
Here's Wayne Michael Bitch at it again. And again. And again. And again. He has written half of the total number of comments on this article online and here. Mr. Bitch, there's only a thin line between love and hate. Mr. Bitch must have no life. He's so concerned about the feelings of those in Armpit, AZ (not!) that he rants on and on and on and on and on with his little vendetta against New Times. Somebody over there must have pissed in his Frosted Flakes.
-
Pattyholmes 03/24/2011 3:29:00 PM
I am done with New Times and their horrible writing....
-
03/24/2011 12:17:00 PM
??? http://soozone.com???
Wholesale all kinds of world brand shoes,jeans,t-shirts,bikini,beach
pants,handbags,wallets,sunglasses,belt,caps,watches etc..
┴┬┴┬/ ̄\_/ ̄\
┬┴┬┴▏ ▏▔▔▔\
┴┬┴/\ / ﹨
┬┴∕ / / )
! !
┬┴▏ ▔█◤
┴◢██◣ \__/
┬█████◣ /
┴████████████◣
◢████████████▆▄
◢███████████▆▄
█◤◢██◣◥███████◤\
◥◢████ ████████◤ \
┴█████ ██████◤ ﹨
┬│ │█████◤ ▏
┴│ │ ▏
┬∕ ∕ /▔▔▔\ ∕
*∕___/﹨ ∕ \ /\
┬┴┬┴┬┴\ \_ ﹨/
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/24/2011 7:49:00 AM
Dain-
This is an apt statement, as they really believe they're being clever and/or funny.
But since I have a few sets of ears and eyes inside NT, I already knew this was coming.
Let's be honest- Helen Keller could have seen this coming.
All I can say is this- I am so buying you a huge box of Ding Dongs. :)
Respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.blogspot.com
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.com
.
-
03/24/2011 7:36:00 AM
Hi Wayne.
I think the rehashing--and printing of--an abusive article on Yuma is such a nonsensical response to this problem they have created, that all I can muster is this; for some at NT, apparently "History begins at Breakfast."
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/24/2011 7:11:00 AM
They're a lot like an Ex that way, methinks.
Every time you start warming up to them again, they go ahead and remind you exactly just why they were dumped..
-
Wayne Michael Reich 03/24/2011 6:59:00 AM
Connor-
Thanks for your open mind, and your very diplomatic critique.
(It's refreshing to read something that doesn't open with "Go %$@k yourself, Wayne")
And I agree with your comment 100%
(How much? I hit the "like" button thingamajig over there to the right!)
Respectfully,
Wayne Michael Reich
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.blogspot.com
http://www.WayneMichaelReich.com