How about if Obama's affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood is talked about too? Why is only Arpaio who is at the center of attention?
By Amy Silverman
By Olivia LaVecchia
By Monica Alonzo and Stephen Lemons
By Chris Parker
By Michael Lacey
By Weston Phippen
Nativism, as a force in this state and beyond, must be crushed like a fat, hairy tarantula beneath a boot heel.
So while I admire the effort that the Real Arizona Coalition has put into its recently rolled-out S.A.N.E. immigration initiative, the participation of Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery is troublesome.
S.A.N.E. is shorthand for a set of basic suggestions by the coalition, itself a passel of sober-minded businesspeople, politicians, and community leaders who seek an incremental push-back to the ethnic McCarthyism that still defines Arizona.
Secure our borders. Account for everyone here unlawfully. Necessary bureaucratic reform. Engage all areas of government. That's what S.A.N.E. stands for.
You can read the details at www.therealarizona.org. Essentially, it's a low-cal version of comprehensive immigration reform and includes a pathway to legal residency (though not necessarily citizenship) for the undocumented, as well as a loosening of restrictions on immigration.
The DREAM Act? Not exactly. Under the plan, kids brought into the country illegally by their parents may qualify for citizenship if they graduate from a university or college or serve in the military.
Significantly, S.A.N.E. does not require that the border be secured before addressing immigration reform.
That's always been a sticking point for many GOPers, though, in reality, the border already is heavily militarized. Essentially, this prerequisite has existed as an all-purpose excuse for Rs not to budge on the issue.
Overall, the proposal is conservative, and given that we live in the "meth lab of democracy," as Jon Stewart famously called our state, I guess you could call it a baby step forward.
A lot of people I respect have worked hard on S.A.N.E., including the Arizona Anti-Defamation League's Bill Straus, Julie Erfle of Politics Uncuffed, Todd Landfried of the Arizona Employers for Immigration Reform, and Danny Ortega, ex-chair of the National Council of La Raza.
And, so far, S.A.N.E. has snagged some notable supporters, some not terribly surprising: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton, and Dulce Matuz, co-founder of the Arizona Dream Act Coalition.
The big chambers of commerce, Arizona's and Phoenix's, are absent. But smaller business groups have signed on.
Local media have gushed over the initiative, prominently citing the endorsement of Montgomery, its most conservative advocate.
The coalition's press release quotes the right-winger as insisting that we "move from stalemate to solutions on the broader issue of immigration" toward a "sensible approach."
I'll give Montgomery two points — maybe three — for being smart enough to know that Republican politicians have to move to the center on immigration.
Nationally, it's a no-brainer. In the wake of Mitt Romney's disastrous loss, with more than 70 percent of Hispanics voting for President Barack Obama, you'd have to be as deranged as Governor Jan Brewer's criminally insane son not to grok that neon-lit message.
And yet too many Arizona Republicans all but have "Senate Bill 1070" tattooed to their foreheads, Brewer chief among them.
The bottle-blond hag got elected on 1070 and became a heroine to the hard right by spending millions to defend it. Brewer owes everything she has politically to bashing Mexicans.
Her latest racist stunt: an illegal, discriminatory executive order denying driver's licenses to DREAM Act-eligible men and women granted a reprieve under Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.
The ACLU is suing Arizona in federal court, seeking to enjoin Brewer's repulsive move on the grounds that it violates the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause and its 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law.
"We don't license DUI drivers," GED Jan sputtered while defending her sorry act on Fox News, where she compared DREAMers to criminals.
You know, like herself in 1988, when she rear-ended another car and failed field-sobriety tests administered by Arizona Department of Public Safety officers, all the time reeking of scotch.
But the law didn't apply to this desiccated harpy because she was in the state Senate at the time, and she pulled her amnesty, um, I mean, immunity card.
If cynical politicians like former state Senate President Russell Pearce, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Sheriff Paul Babeu, or Brewer fell to their knees, begged forgiveness for scapegoating Latinos, and signed onto S.A.N.E., should we forgive their past sins?
Hell, no. When this crew keels over, one by one, of natural causes, Latinos should stand in line for miles to dance on their graves.
Not that we can count on the aforementioned Tea Party pols ever having come-to-Jesus-moments. They have to be extricated from power, as already has happened to Pearce. Or, in the case of Arpaio, boxed in 'til he's irrelevant.
What, then, should we think of Bill Montgomery's inching toward moderation?
First, let's first review some fairly recent history.
During Montgomery's 2010 GOP primary bid against then-acting County Attorney Rick Romley, he excoriated Romley for what was a true profile in courage — Romley's public suggestion that Brewer veto 1070.
Indeed, Montgomery pimped himself as the ultra-conservative alternative to Romley, appealing to haters at nativist gatherings.
On June 5, 2010, Montgomery campaigned at the pro-SB 1070 Phoenix Rising Rally at Wesley Bolin Plaza, speaking to an audience that included white supremacists and nativist wackos.
The West Point graduate shared the mic that day with Pearce, vicious anti-Mexican activist Barbara Coe, extremist California gubernatorial candidate Chelene Nightingale, and Arizona's Archie Bunker of law enforcement, Arpaio, whom Montgomery introduced, crowing that he enjoyed the evil geezer's "endorsement and support."
See, Arpaio dropped more than $500,000 on attack ads against his longtime nemesis, Romley, sliming him as pro-illegal immigration and helping Monty triumph in the primary. Joe's boy went on to the general election where he had no Democratic opponent.
Romley had halted prosecution of illegal aliens for "self-smuggling" under Arizona's anti-coyote law, the twisted practice of his now-disbarred predecessor Andy Thomas.
But in his address to the trailer trash that day, Montgomery vowed to reinstate the controversial policy.
"When it comes to meth, we prosecute the meth manufacturer, the meth dealer, the meth user," Montgomery explained, slurring the undocumented in the process.
"When it comes to auto theft, we prosecute the auto thief and the chop shop. When it comes to prostitution, we prosecute the pimp, the prostitute, and the John. So when it comes to human smuggling, why shouldn't we prosecute the coyote, and his client who paid for those services?"
Monty went an extra step in mid-August of 2010, appearing with other pols at a Tea Party rally on the ranch of notorious anti-Semitic border vigilante Glenn Spencer.
In 2009, Spencer let Forde onto his property again to use her laptop while she was on the lam from the FBI. He claims he didn't know of Forde's involvement in a May 2009 home-invasion robbery in Arivaca that left 9 year-old Brisenia Flores and her father, Raul, dead.
I find it disturbing to watch the YouTube video of Monty at the rally, leading the crowd in chants of "U.S.A., U.S.A." after mentioning that his fellow border hawks were being observed by some unidentified group on the Mexican side of the fence.
After he was elected, Monty re-instituted the practice of prosecuting people for conspiracy to "self-smuggle" themselves into the United States.
According to a recent report by my colleague Ray Stern, such prosecutions are down from the dark days of Thomas. But they continue: 330 in 2011 and 155 this year, as of the last week in October.
Additionally, the county attorney continues to hold illegal immigrants erroneously charged with forgery as non-bondable under the dictates of Prop 100, passed by voters in 2006.
This may change, thanks to immigration attorney Delia Salvatierra and her law partners, who have filed briefs in Superior Court, arguing that, under the U.S. Supreme Court's 1070 ruling in June, Prop 100 is unconstitutional.
Salvatierra maintains that the state has failed to establish that her client is in the country illegally and, therefore, ineligible for bond. She also claims the state has no evidence that her client, who was caught up in one of Arpaio's raids, violated Arizona laws pertaining to fraud and ID theft.
"The Maricopa County Attorney has a pattern and practice of charging non-citizens with class 4 and higher felonies in order to ensure that they will be non-bondable," reads the brief.
The accused in this case has been in Arpaio's gulags for four months. She is the mother of two U.S. citizen children, one of whom has been diagnosed with leukemia.
And she went to jail for what? For working? For keeping her two kids fed?
Monty continues to support policies and laws that keep such women behind bars instead of with their children, where they belong.
Talk is nice. Monty wants to be governor someday. And his support of S.A.N.E. is his way of beginning to pivot, to seem reasonable on immigration.
But I want results. I want to see people who are essentially innocent treated as such.
And that Monty cannot or will not do as part of his political calculations.
So, like all supporters of nativism, he must be defeated. This time in court. Hopefully, by Salvatierra.
How about if Obama's affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood is talked about too? Why is only Arpaio who is at the center of attention?
100 percent for this! The 16 year old child that is born in the United States under the 14th amendment is a protected US citizen. The ILLEGAL ALIEN parents are not! So the parents get deported and the 16 year old can go into foster care until they become of age. If an ILLEGAL ALIEN is in this country more than 5 years without starting citizenship or applying for a visa then tuff turkey if the BP/ ICE/or your local LEO hauls them off.
a·li·en-Belonging to a foreign country or nation.
IMMIGRANT: one that immigrates: as
a : a person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence
20 million unemployed Americans and another 45 million on food stamps and the New Times wants us to give amnesty to another 20 million more workers and welfare recipients? THIS IS MADNESS! This will drive up unemployment, drive down wages and reduce the availability of social services for working class Americans. We have 15% unemployment in the US today and depressed wages, it is sad to see that the New Times favors criminal immigrants over poor native-born Americans.
If you can change the Constitution concerning the right to bear arms, you certainly can change the Constution towards not allowing Illegal Mexican Occupiers’ children born in the US automatically having citizenship. The Fourteenth Amendment was written in a different time, under different circumstances. It was never meant to automatically give citizenship to any child born on US soil with non legal resident parents. This needs to be clarified immediately.
Why would the ptb want to increase the population with such huge numbers of people when their base is suffering so badly. Marketing futures in dead peasant policies? That such a thing exists in a nation where slavery is illegal and abhorred as immoral should give one pause to reconsider what is true.
"War All the Time" ?????? Yes, there has been a war on wages - COL to earnings ratio, benefits, career ladders - there has been a war on everything good and legal that made the US a desirable immigration destination. You function as troll for the stingy teabag NWO global slave wage or die iniative. If my desire for restoration of the "American DREAM" and honoring the "Contract with America" makes me a "Nativist" I wear the designation proudly. Illegal immigrants of the brown persuasion did not come here to wipe old white ass in a nursing home. That was not their DREAM either.
<Nativism, as a force in this state and beyond, must be crushed like a fat, hairy tarantula beneath a boot heel.>
Mr. Lemons, Good article. Couldn't agree more!
This article shows that Stephen Lemons has really cracked up this time. There should be a law against people like him. Just what the fuck is he talking about ... babbling rubbish again like he always does. What ajoke!
Lemons, you are totally wrong. You wrote, "Nativism, as a force in this state and beyond, must be crushed like a fat, hairy tarantula beneath a boot heal." Unlike natavism, there is no good reason to crush a tarantula. Tarantulas serve a purpose and contribute to a healthy environment. A much better analogy would have been, "Nativism, as a force in this state and beyond, must be injected with venim and left to die a nasty, painful death like prey caught in a tarantula's grasp." That would have been a more fitting analogy.
@maxonepercent HOW DO WE KNOW IF YOU'RE A REAL AMERICAN. MAYBE WE SHOULD GO BACK TO WHEN WE BECAME THE UNITED STATES. Any one who came into this country after that has to prove they are not illegals
@truthseekeraz You are a moron too.
@JoeArpaioFan NO IT SHOWS HE IS A TRUE AMERICAN. Not a mouthpiece for the nazi/fascist party of NO (repugs)
@JoeArpaioFan You certainly don't do your hero any favors by posting your nonsense and you've never made any logical statement or argument that would influence even the most feeble mind to support your idol. But you do serve one solid purpose and that is to remind the world of what type of person is attracted to Joe Arpaio. By all means-keep posting.
Are you still here dipshit. I thought you would have choked to death on arpaio's cock already. It's a shame you are still here you sperm burping dolt.
@JoeArpaioFan GOP troll.
@LegitQuestions NO you're wrong and LEMONS is correct
@sarum Maybe the problem is that even your computer hates you.
@truthseekeraz No, you are a dumb ass liberal troll.
@LegitQuestionsLOVE U 2. My screen shows your comment 2X - duplicated. It's a VOICE NATION problem. Yes my purpose is not to function as a cheerleader. Sorry for you that another POV is so threatening. Sure shows what you are all about.
@sarum I know, totally wierd, huh. Your comments like to disappear and mine like to multiply. Lighten up, I was just joking with you since I don't even know what your comment was (it was deleted, remember).