First presented by the Moscow Art Theatre in 1904, the play concerns the Ranevskys, an aristocratic Russian family that has fallen on hard times, in good part because of Madame Ranevsky, a flighty spendthrift who now faces the loss of her family's magnificent estate and cherry orchard. Burdened with debts, the family has only months before its estate will be auctioned. Family friend Lopakhin, a successful businessman whose father and grandfather worked as slaves for the Ranevskys, advises them to cut down the cherry orchard and build rental cottages there to pay off their debt. When they refuse, he buys the property himself, and the Ranevskys scatter.
Set in 1900, after the tsar's liberation of the serfs and before the Revolution, Chekhov's final play is, among other things, a meditation on classism in which nothing happens -- a construct meant to show, according to Mason's director's notes, "how boring real life was in Russia."
Mason's gentle pacing here is perfect, and Connie Furr-Soloman's costume designs are superb -- she's crowded the stage with dark mourning coats and brocaded evening dresses and period millinery. But neither the costumes nor Mason himself can act for the cast, more's the pity. With a couple of exceptions, this is very much a student production of The Cherry Orchard, one filled with vague performances by young people who are still learning their craft. The handful of veterans in the cast provide little help, although David Vining -- as grouchy old Firs, an aged servant who longs for the "good old days" -- endows his scenes with a mournful sincerity that's light-years away from the other performances. Ultimately, this is a long, lightly acted production of a subtle, slow play. But seen as something other than an evening's entertainment -- perhaps as a valentine to his students, or as a kind of full-circle salute to his career -- Mason's farewell production is a success.
E-mail robrt.pela@newtimes.com