Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Action Movie plus Magic plus Nancy Reagan | Jackalope Ranch | Phoenix | Phoenix New Times | The Leading Independent News Source in Phoenix, Arizona
Navigation

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Action Movie plus Magic plus Nancy Reagan

Besides doing super-fun dating stuff like going to haunted houses for Jackalope Ranch's comprehensive Halloween guide, New Times blogger Colin Lecher and fellow young journalist Jessica Testa go to the movies. Colin: Can I start this off with a confession? Jessica: Go ahead. Colin: I didn't read all the Harry...
Share this:

Besides doing super-fun dating stuff like going to haunted houses for Jackalope Ranch's comprehensive Halloween guide, New Times blogger Colin Lecher and fellow young journalist Jessica Testa go to the movies.

Colin: Can I start this off with a confession?

Jessica: Go ahead.

Colin: I didn't read all the Harry Potter books. Someone revoke my nerd license and repossess my comic books.

Jessica: Don't be too hard on yourself. Harry Potter nerds are a different kind of nerd. They are more mainstream than you comic book people. In a way, you not reading the books just validates your status as a hipster nerd.

Colin: Ouch. Anyway, I actually liked "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," whether or not I know what the hell a Horcrux is. I wasn't that into it at first, but during one of the chase scenes I said, "Holy crap. This is like 'Die Hard' but with magic. I am so on board."

Jessica: "Die Hard" is kind of a stretch, but yeah, the action scenes were pretty intense. I'm glad the director refused to release it in 3D. I might have had a coronary, Also, those Daniel Radcliffe make out scenes (yes, multiple scenes!) would have been way grosser in three dimensions. Remember when he was like 12?

Colin: Agreed, I feel like 3D actually ends up making things less believable sometimes. But how real the movie felt was what drew me in -- the worst scenes were when they tried to make it cheeky and fun before Ron gets a "Saving Private Ryan" battle wound. In a way, it's (and we're coming full circle here) like making a comic book movie. When you make it straight-faced, you get "The Dark Knight." When you try to make a joke out of it, you get "Batman and Robin." ("Ice to meet you!")

Jessica: The humor/tragedy combination is very much part of the books, though. But even as a (very light) Potter fan, I felt like the new movie was really disjointed. The later films have been made for the fans, not the average movie-goer, which can be a good or bad thing. Here, I don't think it worked. If I had seen the movie without reading the book, I, like you, would have no idea what a Horcrux was.

Colin: Wow. Did I actually like this movie more than you did? Maybe it ended up appealing more to non-fans than they expected. But I can see where you're coming from. One thing I hated is that a lot of the action happened off-camera. Case in point:

"What happened to Moody?!"

"He just died in that epic battle."

"Oh, I bet that was pretty wild. Well, let's have some tea then."

Jessica: The best scenes were the character development scenes though. Like when Harry and Hermione start dancing after a really dark, depressing moment. It's touching. Seriously. And I'm not going to say I cried or anything ... but the death count was high.

Colin: I'm not going to say you cried either ... but the tear count was high. I liked how they squeezed a ton of different styles into the movie. After the "Die Hard" scene, Harry and the gang went on a spy mission that could've been an "Ocean's 11" outtake. Then there's some awesome animation, and then a scene where it looks like Ron is on a bad acid trip. And Dolores Umbridge looked like Nancy Reagan or Margaret Thatcher handing out Soviet propaganda. Try that one on for size, Harry Potter over-analyzers. (Yeah, I know, Dumbledore is gay.)

Jessica: Wait, Dumbledore is gay? That makes so much sense...

KEEP NEW TIMES FREE... Since we started New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we'd like to keep it that way. Your membership allows us to continue offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food, and culture with no paywalls. You can support us by joining as a member for as little as $1.