FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIXTHE BIG BIRD AT TERMINAL 2 NEEDS SOMEWHERE TO ROOST
Look! Up on the wall. ... It's a bird! Near some planes! It's supermural!
And since last month, when officials at Sky Harbor International Airport announced the upcoming closure of Terminal 2, the future of the famed phoenix mural has been up in the air. Installed in the spring of 1962, the 16-foot-high, 75-foot-long mural has been eyed by millions, easily making it the most-viewed artwork in the Valley. The mural (currently valued at $75,000 for insurance purposes) combines paint, plastic, broken shells, glass, petrified wood, seaweed, sand and turquoise-52 materials in all, one for each week of the year. The three-dimensional bird is also the best-known work of the late Paul Coze, a local artist whose other public works include the Native American-themed exterior of the former Blue Cross/Blue Shield building at 331 West Indian School, murals inside Veterans' Memorial Coliseum and the stained-glass phoenix that stands outside Town & Country Shopping Center.
More people go through Terminal 2 than have been to the Phoenix Art Museum," says Rick Martinez, Sky Harbor's public information officer.
Martinez admits that for the moment, at least, salvaging the 30-year-old mural isn't the No. 1 priority around Sky Harbor. Right now, everybody is understandably more concerned about moving airlines from one terminal to the other, that kind of stuff," he explains. We haven't forgotten about that mural, though. It's the most popular piece of art we own."
Martinez reports that questions about the artwork's fate surfaced almost immediately after the decision to shutter Terminal 2 was made public.
When people heard that Terminal 2 was going to be closed or torn down, they really concerned themselves with that piece," echoes Lennee Eller, curator of Sky Harbor's art collection. Some pieces of art take on lives of their own, and obviously this mural is one of those. In Phoenix, that mural is more than a piece of art-it's become a cultural landmark."
But just how the city intends to remove the mammoth mural from its moorings remains undecided.
We haven't got that figured out just yet," Martinez confesses with a chuckle. I do know one thing, though. Whatever we wind up doing, it's going to be a bear. That mural was inlaid in the wall as they built it, so now it's actually part of the building."
If the Terminal 2 phaseout unfolds as scheduled, the city has several years to ponder that off-the-wall puzzler. Current plans call for the terminal to remain in use until next summer, when the seven airlines currently operating out of the building move east to Terminal 3. According to Martinez, the city intends to keep the empty terminal in its back pocket" for the next several years, just in case a carrier suddenly needs a lot of new gates all at once. However, Martinez says that in all probability the building will be razed within the next five years.
The city's decision to save the mural has been greeted with guarded enthusiasm within the Valley's art community. Most observers, however, applaud the effort while doubting the practicality of the plan. I don't know what they plan to do with it, but I think it's great that there's an attempt being made to save it," says Jim Ballinger, director of the Phoenix Art Museum.
Paul Coze was not a national or internationally famous artist by any means," says Ballinger of the artist, who died in 1974 at age 71. But when the Phoenix metro area was growing, Coze was a figure that helped galvanize a lot of interest in the arts around here. A lot of people knew him and bought a lot of his smaller paintings, some of which were pretty darn nice." Ballinger reports that the museum still fields calls from travelers who want to know who created the airport mural and whether they can buy other examples of the artist's work.
I think if you were to put that mural on some kind of artistic Richter scale, it'd be of greater value as a kind of Phoenix artistic monument rather than as a great piece of art," says Ballinger. Arguing the purists' point of view, he points out that it would be artistically incorrect to salvage just a portion of the mural, since large-scale pieces of art are often intended to read" left to right. The big question," Ballinger says, is what do you do with something that big?"
What you don't do, some insist, is relocate the mural to a space for which it wasn't originally intended.
Basically it's a museum piece," says Muriel Magenta, an Arizona State University art professor. And while Magenta agrees that the colossal Coze collage is worth preserving as a historical monument, she thinks it would be a big mistake to remount it in a contemporary setting-say, another airport terminal. That mural is an example of something that's very much of its time, an illustrative mural-style piece that relates to the 1940s and 1950s," Magenta says. Unless you had a museum area of the airport, it's out of character with what I hope artists of today are trying to do visually."
But at least one person intimately involved in the creation of the mural doesn't hold up much hope that Sky Harbor's famous phoenix will ever rise again.
Learning of the city's plans to preserve her late husband's work, Kay Coze appears simultaneously pleased and puzzled. It would be very difficult to take that piece down, I should think," says Coze, who makes her living as an artist and muralist. I can't help wondering how they could ever get it back together again, because there never was a diagram. It would be like trying to put together a jigsaw puzzle."
Few people are in a better position to know about the intricacies of the giant art piece. Under her husband's supervision, Kay Coze and several of her husband's students spent 11 months assembling the oversize mural at Paul Coze's east Phoenix studio, creating 15 interlocking pieces that were later assembled in three sections on the west wall of the terminal.
There was never a diagram because things kept changing as it evolved," recalls Coze. Then, when they finally got all the pieces out to the airport, it turned out that the measurement on the wall was four inches off, so that meant juggling everything around. I thought Paul was going to have a fit."
If Coze sounds a mite pessimistic about the success of the mural relocation, she's entitled.
Coze remembers how a construction crew was forced to dismantle another Paul Coze landmark. The freestanding, stained-glass phoenix perched majestically atop a flaming fountain at Town & Country Shopping Center was dismantled during the remodeling of the mall some years back. Following public outcry about the statue's removal, shopping-center officials eventually resurrected the work. Sort of.
When I drove by and saw what they'd done, I couldn't believe it," says Kay Coze, who supplied the shopping center with the original plans for reconstructing the sculpture. They'd taken it off the pedestal, gotten rid of the fountain, put it real low on the ground and painted it off-white."
Nor was she happy about the way church officials handled several religious panels that her husband painted for St. Thomas' Church. Paul's idea was to have bright, clear desert colors and contemporary themes in the stations of the cross," Coze explains. Someone evidently disagreed. Years later (supposedly at the time Charles Keating held his daughter's wedding at the church) someone saw to it that the unorthodox, vibrant colors were muted with a dull copper glaze. When an artist creates something to be seen in a certain way, you don't change it," she says pointedly.
Still, Kay Coze prefers to defer judgment on the mural restoration. They can do amazing things these days. I hope."
IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE. CAN IT?... v6-10-92
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss Phoenix New Times' biggest stories.
- Mexicans Most Likely to be Locked Up in Immigration Detention Centers
- Violent Monsoon Microburst That Exploded Over the Valley Caught on Social Media
- Legal Marijuana in Arizona Would Generate $72M Yearly in Tax Revenue, New Report Says