Supreme Court Strikes Down Proof-of-Citizenship Provision in Proposition 200
An Arizona law requiring people provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections is unconstitutional, says the U.S. Supreme Court.
Even after being recalled from office, ex-state Senate President Russell Pearce is still losing, as Pearce takes credit for authoring Proposition 200, which was passed by voters in 2004.
In a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled that the law was preempted by federal law, which is the result of a long-fought court battle who alleged the law is discriminatory against several minority groups, including Latinos and Native Americans.
Arizona Diamondbacks vs. Miami Marlins
TicketsFri., Sep. 22, 6:40pm
Arizona Cardinals Game Zone - 9/25 - Not A Game Ticket
TicketsMon., Sep. 25, 2:15pm
Arizona Cardinals vs. Dallas Cowboys
TicketsMon., Sep. 25, 5:30pm
Arizona Diamondbacks vs. San Francisco Giants
TicketsMon., Sep. 25, 6:40pm
WWE Smackdown Live
TicketsTue., Sep. 26, 4:45pm
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 requires states to "accept and use" a federal form to register voters for federal elections. That form requires that registrants attest, under penalty of perjury, that they're citizens.
Under Prop 200, elections officials had to toss out any registration form that didn't come with proof of citizenship, beyond just the signature attesting that the person's a citizen.
That does not qualify as "accept[ing] and us[ing]" the federal form, according to the Supreme Court.
Read the ruling, authored by Justice Scalia, below:
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter Our daily newsletter delivers quick clicks to keep you in the know
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in Phoenix, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.