L.A. Theater Website Bitter Lemons Responds to Robrt Pela's Criticism of The Stranger's Christopher Frizzelle

Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

Los Angeles theater website Bitter Lemons published a piece by Jason Rohrer on October 23 in which Rohrer takes issue with New Times' Robrt Pela, in particular his October 9 essay, It's Not Okay to Review Plays After One Act, Christopher Frizzelle

Pela argued in that piece that it is unethical as a critic to review a play that said critic has not seen in its entirety. It was a response to The Stranger's editor-in-chief, Frizzelle, penning a review of the first half of a production of What We Talk About When We Talk About Love. Frizzelle's article panned the show and opened with the line,"First of all: I walk out of plays at intermission all the time, so save your outrage."

In his New Times article, Pela explained why he does not split mid-show, "I stay because it’s not possible to fairly review a play or musical that one has not seen through to its end. Pretending you gave the production you’re reviewing every possible chance is not ethical; it’s not fair-minded; it’s not journalism."

Rohrer caught wind of Pela's article, and proceeded to write a takedown of a takedown of a takedown. He described Pela's work as an "effete, languidly angry essay," and posits that "what Robrt Pela gets wrong here is only everything."

Which leads us to the inevitable question: What do Rohrer's journalistic ethics involve? Turns out, Bitter Lemons is an outlet that has advocated for theater companies to pay critics to review their shows. So, there's that.

"I admire Jason Rohrer’s talent for writing, and stand up for his right to bash me with his opinion," Pela says when asked for comment on the Bitter Lemons article. "I have made my living doing as much for three decades, as most who know me will tell you, and despite Rohrer’s assertion that I have 'no particular reputation,' I do worry that my complaints about his unethical practice of charging theater companies for reviews will be misconstrued as sour grapes on my part, and so I’ll decline any further comments on Rohrer’s nicely written piece defending his antithetical practices."

Editor's note: This article has been updated.

Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.