Andrew Thomas Bar Complaints to Be Handled by Colorado Official | Valley Fever | Phoenix | Phoenix New Times | The Leading Independent News Source in Phoenix, Arizona
Navigation

Andrew Thomas Bar Complaints to Be Handled by Colorado Official

To guard against possible conflicts of interest, the Arizona Supreme Court has handed off bar complaints against Maricopa County Attorney Andy Thomas to a Colorado official. John Gleason, regulation attorney for the Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Regulation will now have the job of sorting out the various allegations of...
Share this:

To guard against possible conflicts of interest, the Arizona Supreme Court has handed off bar complaints against Maricopa County Attorney Andy Thomas to a Colorado official.

John Gleason, regulation attorney for the Colorado Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Regulation will now have the job of sorting out the various allegations of misconduct against Thomas raised in last month's terse ruling by Pima County Judge John Leonardo. Click here for the Arizona court's administrative order.

Just a wild guess here, but maybe the Supreme Court couldn't find any good lawyers in the state who didn't give money to Tim Nelson, who was Andrew Thomas' opposition in the 2008 campaign.


The previous lawyer assigned by the state Supreme Court to handle allegations of misconduct against Thomas, J. Scott Rhodes, resigned his appointment after Thomas complained that Rhodes had donated money to Nelson.


In a public statement, Chief Justice Rebecca White Berch wrote that the new appointment should solve the problem:

"We appreciate the Colorado Supreme Court's willingness to assist us. Mr. Gleason brings expertise in attorney discipline matters, and, as a Colorado resident, he has had no involvement in Maricopa County politics and is therefore free from any perceived bias," stated Chief Justice Berch.

"We have worked with Mr. Gleason and his team on several issues, including recent efforts to improve Arizona's attorney discipline system," Berch noted, "and we are confident that he will conduct a fair and thorough review of this matter."

Since the Arizona Supreme Court cautioned Thomas against his possible conflicts of interest a year ago, then watched as he ignored the concerns, the Court must believe Gleason will not only be fair -- but that he'll aggressively go after Thomas.

KEEP NEW TIMES FREE... Since we started New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we'd like to keep it that way. Your membership allows us to continue offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food, and culture with no paywalls. You can support us by joining as a member for as little as $1.