[
{
"name": "Related Stories / Support Us Combo",
"component": "11576102",
"insertPoint": "4",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "6"
},{
"name": "Air - Billboard - Inline Content",
"component": "11576098",
"insertPoint": "2/3",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "3"
},
{
"name": "Air - MediumRectangle - Inline Content - Mobile Display Size 2",
"component": "11576099",
"insertPoint": "12",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "12"
},{
"name": "Air - MediumRectangle - Inline Content - Mobile Display Size 2",
"component": "11576099",
"insertPoint": "4th",
"startingPoint": "16",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "12"
}
,{
"name": "RevContent - In Article",
"component": "12633456",
"insertPoint": "3/5",
"requiredCountToDisplay": "5"
}
]
Page 3 of 3
"Therefore . . . the separate DUI courts do not cause any concrete injury to the individual plaintiffs as victims of DUI probationers," the judges concluded.
Well, duh.
I know that brilliant lawyers can't always be bothered with the little stuff. But for $361,626, don't you think someone at Jones, Day might have realized that before filing suit?
Thomas' public relations guy, Mike Scerbo, gave me this comment: "The County Attorney's Office will continue to do its utmost to combat racial discrimination in our criminal justice system."
How much do you want to bet they're still considering a last-chance appeal to the Supreme Court?
How much do you want to bet Jones, Day has already started billing?
