Jan Brewer Touted Ban on Spice and Bath Salts, but Lawmakers Are Still Trying to Ban Both

Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

The headline of a press release from Governor Jan Brewer's office issued almost exactly two years ago read, "Governor Jan Brewer outlaws sale and use of synthetic drugs known as 'spice.'"

Then, last year, Brewer touted the "ban" of the synthetic drugs known as "bath salts." Sure enough, legislators concede that they're still trying to make the drugs illegal.

See also:
-Jan Brewer Set To Sign "Bath Salts" Bill, Which Still Leaves "Bath Salts" Legal
-Bath Salts: Our Told-Ya-So Moments on "Ban" Continue

As we've insisted all this time, there wasn't a true ban on "bath salts" or "spice" signed by the governor.

Let's use an analogy -- say Brewer signed a ban on the possession or sales of apples, oranges, and bananas in Arizona. It would be unfair to say Brewer banned the sale and possession of all fruit, right?

What the anti-"bath salts" and "spice" bills did was ban certain chemicals that have been marketed and used as "bath salts" and "spice," but certainly not all of them.

Cops have been confirming this around the state in news stories that pop up every-so-often.

Now, the Associated Press has pointed out that legislators are actually addressing the fact that there was no true "ban" on the substances.

Two Senate bills, SB 1345, and SB 1346 try to go further to limit the sales of the drugs.

SB 1345 bans the sale of "synthetic cannabinoids" by anyone with a liquor license, meaning that a business would lose its license if it's caught selling a substance like "spice," but "regardless of whether or not the synthetic cannabinoids contain any substances" that aren't actually illegal.

The other bill's similar, but makes it illegal statewide to sell or possess substances "substantially similar" to the banned "bath salts" and "spice" substances.

This is what's called an "analog" law.

"This proposal identifies the 'root' of the chemical composition which is changed to develop a mind-altering drug that is different from the formula that is outlawed," notes meeting minutes from the House judiciary committee.

And, already, there's a concession that this wouldn't ban the substances outright.

"[Representative Eddie Farnsworth] opined that this will not stop the problem but it takes a big step in the right direction," the minutes say.

The committee also noted that both state and federal "analog" laws are the subject of pending lawsuits.

Still, this "analog" bill has passed the judiciary committees in both chambers.

Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.