Feathered Bastard

Joe Arpaio's Lawyer Tim Casey Claims Court Lacks Power to Appoint Monitor with Power over Sheriff

Page 2 of 3

See Also: Joe Arpaio Makes Moolah off Melendres, Promises to "Never Back Down"

In his brief on the matter, Casey concedes that a federal judge has the power to tell an elected county sheriff what to do.

And he admits it's well-established that a district court can appoint an independent monitor.

But he argues that an "Article III judge," as in Article III of the U.S. Constitution, cannot appoint a federal monitor, who can tell an elected sheriff what to do.

Read the plaintiffs' latest filing in Melendres.

The most a monitor can do, Casey claims, is suggest stuff to the sheriff, which the sheriff can either follow or not.

Read Casey's asinine arguments in his latest Melendres brief.

KEEP PHOENIX NEW TIMES FREE... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Stephen is a former staff writer and columnist at Phoenix New Times.
Contact: Stephen Lemons