Arizona lawmakers convened a special session today to fiddle with the language of a ballot measure intended to preserve secret-ballot elections in labor-union campaigns.
Funny thing, though: Arizona's got a lot of problems -- and this ain't one of them.
We've written about the issue before: In a nutshell, labor unions -- which have faced falling membership in recent years -- want to game the process of "unionizing" a company.
Traditionally, employees vote in a secret ballot whether to unionize. Labor unions want to get rid of that system, nationwide. If they have their way, unions could muscle their way into companies simply by presenting management with a certain number of employee signatures.
While we agree that eliminating secret ballots seems contrary to democratic principals, the change hasn't happened yet -- and may never happen at all. Although Democrats in Congress floated a bill to end secret ballots in favor of the "card-check" system, the bill didn't go anywhere. Pundits make the reasonable claim that Democrats are unlikely to push hard for the bill, seen by critics as a reward to unions for large campaign contributions, with the political waters already so turbulent.
The Arizona Legislature wants the public to approve the anti-union referendum this November, even though no federal legislation on card-checks yet exists. The special session is needed because the state Supreme Court has decided that Proposition 108, as worded, isn't constitutional.
Lawmakers ought to be able to get the proposition fixed quickly in their special session. Then, maybe, they can get back to doing real work.
Union officials are ticked off, naturally. According to one AP article:
Republicans hate unions and want to spend three days trashing us," said Rebekah Friend, executive director of the AFL-CIO of Arizona.
