Study Concludes Sex Only Burns 21 Calories Per Encounter, And An Average of Six Minutes Burning Those Calories

Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

We're actually not sure which is the most depressing revelation of the study published in the New England Journal of Medicine: That sex for the typical American only burns 21 calories or that it only burns 21 calories because Americans only have sex for an average of six minutes an "encounter." Just how little is 21 calories? The simple act of being alive means that your brain burns around 11 calories per hour just to keep the lights on. In other words, literally not being brain dead for 2 hours in a row burns more calories than a tumble in the hay.

See Also: --Epic Mealtime Makes an Epic Mistake

The study was funded by the National Institute of Health and designed to take a look at common health myths related to obesity. Some have criticized the study because a number of the researchers have received grants or payments from companies like Coca-Cola, McDonalds and Jenny Craig. perhaps this Flight of the Conchords might accurately represent the average American sexual experience.

Apparently the misinformation about how many calorie are burned during sex stem from two problems. First, previous studies looked at fairly small populations. Secondly, it was generally assumed that people were knocking boots for 30 minutes a go not.... not six minutes.

Some of the other depressing but useful highlights from the study:

  • Losing weight slowly due to slightly reducing calories or slightly increasing exercise doesn't really translate into improved long term health changes.
  • Neither physical education classes nor childhood health habits in general have much of an impact on long term weight loss.
  • Snacking, in and of itself, doesn't necessarily result in weight gain.

This was a study that looked at other studies so it in and of itself doesn't prove anything, just addresses whether deficiencies in other studies might lead to an inaccurate representation of reality. It also doesn't invalidate that some of these things might still be good advice, just not to everyone. Take the snacking finding. Reducing or eliminating snacking by itself might not actually cause a long term loss of weight for any number of reasons. It's possible, for instance, that people simply start eating larger meals to compensate. The central problem is that people are still overeating and that's why they're not losing weight.

Follow Chow Bella on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest.

Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.