Come on!!! Mr. Rubin are you laying all this on the DEFENSE attorneys in Martinson? Why didn't you detail, for comparison and fairness, what the county paid and continues to pay for Thomas' and Arpaio's MISDEEDS in OFFICE?!?!?!? VanDreumel and Terribile didn't seek out the Martinson case - they were asked to take it. And what you also failed to print is the fact that BOTH these attorneys had lucrative practices before Martinson. One of the conditions of taking Martinson was that they would basically have to forego any other work. And given that what they got paid is LESS than what the county pays for Thomas and co and Arpiao's attorneys, let alone the fact that their lawyers aren't shutting down all other business to take these cases, your story smacks on bias. It appears your story is a hachet job on a convenient target - defense attorneys. I guess seeking justice in a death case does have a cost ceiling.
Are you reading-impaired, or just stupid. New Times has reported incessently about what the county has paid for Thomas and Arpaio's bullshit! This doesn't mean it can't also report that a lawyer makes so much money off the public that she can buy a fucking Bentley, and her partner a God-damn office building! Get your fucking head our of your dumb ass.
Get your fucking head out of your own ass dog fucker. What Was asked was a side. Y side. Omparison in THIS story you stupid shit for brains idiot. And you got a problem. Ecause lawyers make money doing what is require of them in defending a man accused of such a serious charge and facing the ultimate punishment? Get. Sck in your run down crackhead hood trailer loser and quit the jealousy over other folks' success. You stupid fuck.
Man, you have lost it! Make a lot of assumptions, do you? Hope you find more facts to work with in your law practice. Sheesh, why don't you put your name on your rantings? Well, because nobody would ever retain a hothead, lamebrain like you again. Oh, and I saw everything involved in this. That's why I'm laughing at you, as are most of the lawyers in town. Heh, you should zip up that stupid trap of yours. Somebody might figure out that you're a principal in the case. Just saying...
HaHAHa trust me dip-shit - last thing you want is me near you on a bar stool (which is probably exactly where you spend your unemployed ass). You're an idiot. Funny how losers like you "hate" lawyers,,,that is until you NEED a lawyer (sorry your ex had a better lawyer and she and her new beau cleaned you out...) And when losers like you need a lawyer, you want the BEST, Nastiest, Hard fighting lawyer you can afford or get appointed (Luckily Mr.Martinson got just that). So you see, loser, you're fool and a joke. As for Mr. Rubin's story ending big paydays, not likely dumbs - the "going standard rate" is $125.00 an hour. Figure in the fact that most capital cases take over two years to prepare for trial, and, well, even with your welfare income, you should be able to do that math. As for your bullshit claim that the Martinson case was not "worth" a million "bucks", enlighten us all how you come to that conclusion... have you seen the billings, the work, the trial, the total hours involved? ANYTHING to justify your claim? Nope - you're just another loser with a big mouth spouting off about shit you know nothing about. Sorry Law School was just a far-away pipe dream for you and the bar stool works out better for you. As for the public defender's office, aren't you forgetting that in addition to the 100K income, there's all those holidays, med and dental insurance, life insurance, retirement, law school loan repayment, etc. HAHAHA not a bad gig rather, right Loser!!! Way to embarrass yourself AGAIN. Inclosing, let me reiterate (that means say again...) - sorry your ex and her beau had a better lawyer and left you broke which is the REAL reason you hate lawyers.
Right-wing loser? Hardly. I voted for Obama, but he's not liberal enough for me. Heh, you're just making a bigger fool of yourself with every post, lawyer fucktard. Doubt you'd be talking so tough if we were sitting next to each other on a bar stool. I smell a pussy. Oh, I see the issues just fine. Love it the way you look down on the very people who employ you, the folks you "use" as a means to suck money out of taxpayers (among other things you suck stuff from). As if making minimum wage is a sin, and only "smart" guys like you lawyers deserve to make bank. Your hatred of the poor you represent is classic! Oh, I know, nobody's intelligent enough to know what you mouthpieces go through, having to get your expensive duits dirtied up defending "low-lifes." Boo, hoo. Face it, everytody hates you blood-sucking scum. Nobody's asking you defense-lawyer creeps to work for free, but there's no way you deserve a million bucks apiece on a case like Martinson, and you fucking know it! Oh yeah, it was a used Bentley. It was an office building in foreclosure. Two of your earlier clueless points. I'm afraid, thanks to Rubin, your big paydays may be coming to a close, which is what you're so burned-up insane about, right. The Bentley train is getting derailed. Maybe you'll have to go to work in the public defender's office, and make just $100,000 a year. How sad for you.
Ahh, Dog Fucker, note how you're the only one here arguing against lawyers and especially lawyers making good money - on the public dime. As for coherent posts, read your own posts, dog fucker, you make no sense at all other than to reveal that you're nothing more than a myopic, homunculus little twit of a "man" who is also homophobic. So, let's see, what lawyers are on the public dime -- Prosecutors, Government agency counsel, etc. Why are you not complaining about what Thomas', Aubuchon, Alexander and Arpaio's lawyers are getting paid? Why are you not complaining about the huge costs of death penalty cases especially when ALL studies show it to be completely worthless in crime prevention and deterrence?
You see Dog Fucker, you can't see the REAL issues involved in this story, because you are so blinded by your own minimum wage salary (oh, I know, you'll post back how "rich" you are, own your own company, etc.... sure ya do, DF, suuuuure ya do) that you have to attack the least important aspect of this story - how good lawyers, who are doing a good job, privately spend their own earned income...which isn't ANY OF OUR BUSINESS (Sad Mr. Rubin got side-tracked on this point, but got to sell stories lest he don't get paid...)
Sorry your pathetic life is so bad you have to be so jealous of these two lawyers who (1) got asked to take the case, (2) took it with the understanding they would forego other work, (3) took it at an AGREED UPON contractual price, (4) did, and are doing, what real lawyers do - fight for their client, (5) and have done a great job of it so far. It's only homophobic little right-wing losers like you that would expect these lawyers to sacrifice their own lives for free to defend a man accused of murder and facing the death penalty. So, take your loser ass, go find that dog you like to "bite" and saddle up to other homophobic ass clowns like yourself, and let real people debate what the real issue is in this story.
Lamebrain lawyer asshole, it's probably worthless to respond to you. Yo have probably died from a stroke. You're so upset that you can't even write a coherent thought. Um, you ever heard the one with the punchline: it's a good start? Sorry, but lawyers like you don't deserve to get rich on the public dime. Go fuck yourself! And keep up the good work, New Times. As usual, you the stuck pigs are squealing like little faggots.
Dude - it was a used Bentley and the office building was a wreck and under foreclosure - I guess you didn't get the whole point of the story - the death penalty SUCKS!!!
