Better Use of Taxpayer Money: Defending Arpaio’s Racial Profiling, or 73 Jetpacks?

The estimate of the taxpayers' tab in the Melendres v. Arpaio lawsuit is more than $7.3 million, the Feathered Bastard reported yesterday.While thinking of a more judicious use of $7.3 million in taxpayer money, we found these really badass jetpacks...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Advertising Can't Do It Alone

The challenges facing local news organizations are very real. That's why reader support matters more than ever. If you believe independent journalism matters, make a contribution today and help us reach our summer fundraising goal of $15,000 by August 9.

$15,000

The estimate of the taxpayers’ tab in the Melendres v. Arpaio lawsuit is more than $7.3 million, the Feathered Bastard reported yesterday.

While thinking of a more judicious use of $7.3 million in taxpayer money, we found these really badass jetpacks.

The Martin Jetpack company isn’t making these bad-boys yet, but it’s shooting for a price of $100,000.

Instead of defending unconstitutional policing, we could get 73 Maricopa County jetpacks (one for every 54,000 residents). At least we’d have something to show for it, instead of just pissing it away into the ether.

Catch up on the latest

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter for a recap on politics, dining, culture, music and more

Our colleague Stephen Lemons says, “This is hardly the only legal bill associated with Melendres. Nor will it be the last.”

So we could have had even more jetpacks.

Which sounds like a better use of taxpayer money to you: defending Arpaio, or these cool jetpacks?

Cast your vote below:



Send feedback and tips to the author.
Follow Matthew Hendley on Twitter at @MatthewHendley.

Loading latest posts...