The fight over SB 1070 is shaping up to be a legal battle for the ages, and today the American Bar Association joined in the melee.
The ABA submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. District Court in Arizona recommending a preliminary injunction of SB 1070 until the law's constitutionality can be sorted out in court.
The 27-page brief lays out four aspects of the law that have the ABA concerned -- on the top of the list, of course, is the possibility that it could lead to racial profiling by Arizona law enforcement agencies.
The other three areas of concern are: probable mandatory detention of citizens and non-citizens, the increased burden and new obligations on Arizona's indigent-defense program, and the attempted usurpation of exclusive federal authority to enforce immigration laws.
There are currently 18 pending motions against the new law by multiple plaintiffs, as well as two pending motions to dismiss the lawsuits led by none other than (cue the Darth Vadar music, SB 1070-haters) Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
The law is set to go into effect next month, unless a court enjoins its implementation.
Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.