Police & Law Enforcement

Andrew Thomas Disqualified From Mary Rose Wilcox Criminal Case; Indictment Dropped

​A judge has tossed Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas off his criminal case against County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox, more than agreeing with arguments presented by Wilcox's attorney. Pima County Judge John Leonardo also dismissed the indictment against Wilcox, leaving the possibility open for a special prosecutor to bring charges in the future...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Advertising Can't Do It Alone

The challenges facing local news organizations are very real. That's why reader support matters more than ever. If you believe independent journalism matters, make a contribution today and help us reach our summer fundraising goal of $15,000 by August 9.

$15,000

?A judge has tossed Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas off his criminal case against County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox, more than agreeing with arguments presented by Wilcox’s attorney.

Pima County Judge John Leonardo also dismissed the indictment against Wilcox, leaving the possibility open for a special prosecutor to bring charges in the future.

Of course, it remains to be seen whether any prosecutor will want to pick up this case now, though, after Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk’s damning criticism of the corrupt process that led to the Wilcox charges in the first place. 

The bombshell ruling appears to be a serious smackdown, stating that Thomas retaliated against Wilcox for grievances he alleged in a civil racketeering lawsuit filed in December by him and Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Catch up on the latest

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter for a recap on politics, dining, culture, music and more

One of the reasons for Thomas’ obvious conflict of interest, according to the ruling by Leonardo, is his political alliance with Arpaio, “who misused the power of his office to target members of the [Board of Supervisors] for criminal investigation.

Wowsa!

Scroll down for a link to the ruling:

Click here for the ruling.

 

We’ll update this story later with a more detailed analysis.

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE FIRST UPDATE, AND FOLLOW THE LINKS IN THAT POST FOR MORE UPDATES.

 

Loading latest posts...