| News |

Baseline Killer/Rapist Case Goes To Jury This Morning: Mark Goudeau Faces Possible Death Penalty If Convicted

Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

Mark Goueeau's fate officially is in the hands of a Maricopa County jury as of 10 a.m.



The prosecution and defense completed their respective closing arguments yesterday afternoon in a courtroom packed with the family members of victims, some (alleged) victims themselves, members of the Phoenix Police Department's "Baseline Task Force," media and others.

Randy Craig, who led the Goudeau defense team, spoke passionately to the jury for several hours, claiming that prosecutors had failed to prove their sprawling case against the accused serial killer.

"The state thought they had an open-and-shut case here," Craig said, [but] is there anything but what they say was found in a laboratory?"

In part, Craig was referring to the extremely likely presence of Goudeau's DNA on several victims.

He also was talking about the presence of DNA matched to two of Goudeau's alleged murdered victims on a white Nike sneaker and a black ski mask belonging to Goudeau that police collected during a search of Goudeau's residence in the hours after his September 6, 2006, arrest.

As for another piece of critical evidence--a ring and other jewelry belonging to murder victim Tina Washington (read about that tragic case in great detail right here)--that the cops also found tucked away in a baggie inside a brown leather shoe during a subsequent search of Goudeau's home, Craig said this:

"Somebody entered the home [after the September 6 search] and put [the telltale baggie] there."

Nice try. Seriously doubt it will fly.

Deputy county attorney Suzanne Cohen naturally focused on the greatest strengths of the case against Goudeau--the overwhelming DNA and the ballistics evidence against the guy.

"The science is corroborated and is the corroboration," Cohen told the jury. "The DNA technology has not been questioned....The evidence proved the defendant is the wolf."

Indeed it wasn't, even though defense attorney Craig promised the jurors several times during the months-long trial that he would contest that evidence tooth-and-nail.

In fact, the defense presented no evidence and no witnesses during the trial.

We will be publishing an in-depth piece on this remarkable case in a few weeks.

No clue, of course, when the jury will return its verdicts, but we'll report in when it happens.





Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.