For some reason, a few legislators weren't fans of Arizona Congressman Trent Franks naming his bill for a federal ban on race/gender-based abortions after Frederick Douglass and Susan B. Anthony.
The bill was submitted by Franks under the name "Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass Prenatal Non-discrimination Act of 2011," but was amended to the "Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act" before it passed out of the House Judiciary Committee last week.
Congressman Hank Johnson, a Georgia Democrat, had some other ideas for shameless name-dropping in the bill's title.
Johnson offered amendments to change the bill's title to either "The Ronald Reagan Impose Your Beliefs on a Woman's Womb Act" or "The Tea Party Determines What Rights a Woman Has Act."
Since the title change to the "Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act" was agreed to, Johnson ended up pulling both amendments.
Others on the committee -- mostly the Democrats -- were still pissed off about Franks' decision to use Douglass and Anthony as the headline for his abortion bill.
"The reason why this continues is because it is such an egregious act to misappropriate the name of a dead man, who happens to be a hero, who stood for certain things," Johnson said. "And to go back and revise that history, that legacy, for purely political purposes is what is objectionable to me."
After explaining his amendments to change the title, then withdrawing them, Johnson was then scolded by Ohio Republican Congressman Steve Chabot -- for taking Reagan's name "in vain."
"The gentleman has just more or less taken Ronald Reagan's name in vain and said that had Ronald Reagan been around back in slavery times, he would have been for slavery," Chabot said. "I do not think that is the case."
Chabot continued his rant on Reagan, before yielding back to Johnson after Johnson and others requested Chabot stop speaking 11 times.
After all that, neither Reagan nor Douglass made the title, as the bill passed out of committee as the "Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act."
Read through the transcript of the meeting by clicking here.
Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.