Morning Poll: Are Cross-Gender Jail Pat-Downs Unconstitutional?

The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office experienced another newspaper to the nose yesterday when the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case where a lower court ruled against it in a lawsuit regarding cross-gender jail pat-downs.

For many heterosexual, male inmates, a female detention officer grabbing their junk might be slightly less uncomfortable than allowing a male guard do it. It might, in some cases, be the highlight of his day.

However, it wasn't for former MCSO inmate Charles Byrd. He claims a 2004, somewhat-nude strip search -- during which a female MCSO detention officer cadet grabbed his butt and penis -- violated his Fourth Amendment right to protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 6-5 in favor of Byrd in the case -- but only after a jury in a lower court determined Byrd's rights had not been violated.

See out story here.

We want to know what you think: Are cross-gender jail pat-downs unconstitutional?

Cast your vote below. 

KEEP PHOENIX NEW TIMES FREE... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
James King
Contact: James King