Morning Poll: Are Cross-Gender Jail Pat-Downs Unconstitutional?

The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office experienced another newspaper to the nose yesterday when the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case where a lower court ruled against it in a lawsuit regarding cross-gender jail pat-downs.For many heterosexual, male inmates, a female detention officer grabbing their junk might be...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office experienced another newspaper to the nose yesterday when the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case where a lower court ruled against it in a lawsuit regarding cross-gender jail pat-downs.

For many heterosexual, male inmates, a female detention officer grabbing their junk might be slightly less uncomfortable than allowing a male guard do it. It might, in some cases, be the highlight of his day.

However, it wasn’t for former MCSO inmate Charles Byrd. He claims a 2004, somewhat-nude strip search — during which a female MCSO detention officer cadet grabbed his butt and penis — violated his Fourth Amendment right to protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 6-5 in favor of Byrd in the case — but only after a jury in a lower court determined Byrd’s rights had not been violated.

See out story here.

We want to know what you think: Are cross-gender jail pat-downs unconstitutional?

Cast your vote below. 


GET MORE COVERAGE LIKE THIS

Sign up for the News newsletter to get the latest stories delivered to your inbox

Loading latest posts...