There's a debate waging among New Times staffers over whether there should be a fee to hike Camelback Mountain -- or at the very least, a fee to park near the mountain.
The debate is fueled by -- among other things -- the eight people who needed to be rescued from the mountain on Sunday.
Part of the rationale for the fee is the belief that by charging people to hike the mountain it will keep inexperienced hikers from attempting the climb without the necessary provisions -- namely water.
It will also clear some parking spaces at Echoe Canyon parking area for the real hikers.
Another valid point: ski resorts charge upwards of 70 bucks to play on their mountains.
On the other hand, nobody wants to pay to hike in a public place and it doesn't seem fair to charge people to basically walk around outside.
We want to know what you think: should there be a fee to hike Camelback?
Vote -- and see the results of yesterday's poll -- below.
- 29 percent say yes.
- 19 percent say no.
- 52 percent say it makes no difference -- the dude's already toast.
Here is your morning poll:
Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.