Business

3 Valley suburbs rank atop list of best U.S. cities for renters

According to a new study, the Phoenix area might as well be a renter's paradise.
View from Echo Canyon walking trail looking out over housing in Scottsdale
A view from Echo Canyon walking trail looking out over housing in Scottsdale.

slovegrove/Getty Images

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Do you rent your home or apartment as a way of life? Do you love the flexibility of a lease, of being able to try new neighborhoods or cities, and not having to worry about the unexpected expenses of being a homeowner? 

Or maybe renting is a means to an end for you. Maybe it’s a necessary pitstop on the way to homeownership while you scrounge together enough for a deposit and figure out if you really like your neighborhood enough to put down deeper roots.

Well, no matter your motivation, we have good news! If you rent in the Valley, you’ve apparently made a great decision, according to a new study by WalletHub. And if you rent in Scottsdale, even better!

Three Phoenix suburbs took the podium on a ranking of the best U.S. cities for renters. Scottsdale, Gilbert and Chandler respectively ranked first, second and third out of 180 cities. If you live here, according to WalletHub, you’re getting a good deal.

Catch up on the latest

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter for a recap on politics, dining, culture, music and more

Editor's Picks

The financial site compared 180 different rental markets to determine the best and worst places in the country for renters. Those cities included the 150 most populated cities in the U.S. and at least two of the most populated cities in each state. Using data from a host of sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau, Zillow, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, WalletHub analyzed 21 metrics to assess the quality of life in each city and the general state of the rental market and affordability.

a U.S. map showing the best places to rent in the U.S. Scottsdale, Gilbert and Chandler rank 1st, 2nd and 3rd

WalletHu

The study found that while first-place winner Scottsdale isn’t the most affordable city, it isn’t the most expensive either. And people pay less for more. Most renters spend less than 22% of their income on rent, and Scottsdale homes are bigger than many in the country, coming in at an average of 2,179 square feet. All in all, it’s a good place to be if you’re a renter.

“Scottsdale ranks as the best city for both the availability of jobs and the driving environment (traffic and infrastructure quality),” the study says. “It also has the fourth-best weather and the seventh-best recreation options.”

Related

Meanwhile, renters in Gilbert spent a little bit less on average for rent — 21% of their annual income — but got nearly as much square footage, with the average home square footage coming in at 2,101 square feet. Gilbert’s public school system also ranked well, and its crime rate was the third-lowest. 

Chandler also did well on income-to-rental ratio — only 21% spent on rent on average — and ample square footage in rental homes. But its primary claim to fame was the fact that a landlord can ask for a maximum of only two months’ rent for a security deposit, greatly relieving the financial burden on people looking to nail down a spot. 

In total, eight Valley communities (including Phoenix) ranked in the top 25, with Peoria earning a mention for having the fifth-highest vacancy rate among all 180 cities. The study also gave a shout-out to a state law about bedbug infestations, which includes protections for tenants that prevent landlords from renting out properties with an active infestation. 

Here’s how all of the Phoenix metro-area cities ranked on the list: 

Related

25. Tempe
Rental market and affordability: 53rd
Quality of life: 29th

19. Phoenix
Rental market and affordability: 39th
Quality of life: 27th

17. Glendale
Rental market and affordability: 54th
Quality of life: 20th

16. Mesa
Rental market and affordability: 49th
Quality of life: 21st

6. Peoria
Rental market and affordability: 22nd
Quality of life: 2nd

3. Chandler 
Rental market and affordability: 11th
Quality of life: 5th

2. Gilbert
Rental market and affordability: 6th
Quality of life: 9th

1. Scottsdale
Rental market and affordability: 24th
Quality of life: 1st

Loading latest posts...