VA Hospital Confirms Water Leak on Surgery Patient, but Blacks Out "Quality Assurance" Documents

Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

The Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center in Phoenix has finally confirmed what an anonymous source told us back in October:

Backed-up toilet water really did drip into the open surgical wound of a veteran on an operating table.

Still, we're not terribly impressed with the records received from the VA hospital. Not only did it take the VA two months to satisfy our records request, but many of the documents we requested were completely blacked out.

Annoyingly, the hospital only released a written brief on one of the "drip" incidents, despite issuing an October press release that explained how the problem occurred on two separate occasions, to two separate patients.

Our records request had asked for all documents related to the drippings, so it looks like the VA is holding back records related to the second incident. As we mentioned in October, an anonymous source tells us that water drips actually occurred four times.

One question we'd like answered is how much time elapsed between the first and second incident, and why the problem wasn't fixed the first time it happened.

The "issue brief" we did receive explains how on August 9, water from the ceiling dripped into the surgical area while a 69-year-old veteran having a gall bladder operation.

"The leak also affected the anesthesia supply room," the brief states.

The operating table was moved to another room, and the surgery turned out okay -- following extra doses of antibiotics both during and after the operation. The patient recovered quickly and repeatedly praised the surgery nursing staff, though it's unclear if that was before or after he knew what had happened.

The brief states that the patient's physician later disclosed the disgusting truth to him. The veteran was instructed to return for "frequent clinic visits" in the weeks after the surgery "for possible wound infection."

On the same day as it occurred, top officials at the hospital were informed about the problem and an "action plan" was put into place to stop it from happening again. The hospital previously confirmed to New Times that the plumbing mishap was caused by a mental patient on a higher floor who stuffed a toilet with paper towels.

The action plan called for the sealing of all possible places where water leaks could occur above the surgical rooms, and for smaller amounts of toilet paper and paper towels to be kept in patient rooms.

In the meantime, engineering design work has already begun on a plan to replace the hospital's entire plumbing system.

"Where possible, drain pipes will be rerouted away from the OR," the brief reads. Officials estimate the plumbing project will be finished by this time next year.

Another issue brief we received dates from July 22, and refers to "numerous allegations" regarding the quality of surgical care at the hospital. We can't tell you what kind of action or comments were taken concerning these allegations, because that part of the brief is blacked out. The brief does claim, however, that "the evidence does not support the allegations."

A third brief refers to a team that conducted a "thorough review" in late September of the hospital's surgical services.

"Upon completion of the inspection, an exit briefing was conducted for leadership," the brief states. Everything that follows in the two-page brief is blacked out. Apparently, we're supposed to believe the hospital's press release in October that states that the team concluded there was "no compromise to patient care," even though the hospital redacted the document that might back up that statement.

Mary Monet, the VA public records officer who fulfilled our request, wrote in an accompanying letter that information was redacted to comply with a law disallowing the release of medical quality assurance records. The law's meant to allow people to freely talk about each other without having to worry that what they say will be disclosed to anyone. Former Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak had been pushing for a bill to make the agency more transparent, but he was voted out of office in November.

Monet promises to get back to us this week with more information on the second drip incident.

Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.