4

Joe Arpaio's Deputies Harass Activists with Cameras, but Arpaio Acknowledged Observers' Right to Film in 2006

^
Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

Sheriff Arpaio's boys in beige have begun a war within a war against those who observe them -- activists armed with video cameras who listen to police scanners during Arpaio's racial profiling sweeps and scramble to find the stop and capture it on camera.

During the last sweep -- which occurred during Labor Day weekend in southwest Phoenix -- activists, reporters, lawyers, and at least one politician were harassed. In one case, a legal observer was ordered to give up his camera because it had become "evidence" in the words of the deputy. That deputy took off once a local news crew showed up.

In another incident at the Gran Mercado, activist/radio show host Carlos Galindo says his video camera was taken from him as he filmed deputies "investigating" bootleg CDs and DVDs. Galindo claims they took the camera from him, erased the video and gave it back. But, Galindo indicates on the YouTube video he posted that he was able to retrieve the video in any case.

Phoenix City Councilman Michael Nowakowski was harassed by deputies as he observed their activity in the parking lot of a Burger King. Even though deputies finally allowed him to approach and ask questions, Nowakowski was later warned via letter from the MCSO not to interfere with MCSO investigations. Videographer Dennis Gilman caught the Nowakowski incident on tape, and has posted it to his YouTube site Humaneague002.

Gilman's video of the south Phoenix sweep, featuring Councilman Michael Nowakowski

Interestingly, Arpaio himself acknowledged the right of activists to legally observe arrests in a 2006 letter sent to Sean Whitcomb, an activist with Copwatch, an organization in Phoenix dedicated to monitoring all police agencies in the Valley. In a response to a letter from Whitcomb sent to advise the MCSO of what Copwatch would be doing, Arpaio even went so far as to solicit their help with any malfeasance they might observe.

"Thank you for taking the time to give us a brief synopsis about your organization's concern for police brutality," states the letter, signed by Arpaio. 

The correspondence goes on to say, "If you feel that you have observed any misconduct by any of our employees, please call the Sheriff's Administration..."

(You can read Arpaio's letter, here, and Whitcomb's letter prompting that response, here.)

Though Copwatch was out observing this latest sweep, not all of those videotaping are Copwatch members. Asked why he thought there were so many conflicts with legal observers this last time out, Whitcomb chalked it up to confusion on the deputies' parts as to how to deal with them.

"I think it's because deputies are not being trained on how to handle encounters with observers," said Whitcomb. "There are some who are familiar with Copwatchers being there, and there are some who are not, and who are uncomfortable with it. I think it comes down to them being uncomfortable with the public knowing exactly what they are doing.

"An officer who is doing everything according to the letter of the law, has nothing to fear from being videotaped," continued Whitcomb. "But those who feel like what they're doing is not appropriate or who feel like the entire operation leaves a bad taste in their mouths, then they might not feel comfortable with being personally a part of it."

Whitcomb said Copwatch has been around since 1999, and has dozens of active members. None of its members have ever been arrested or had their cameras confiscated by local gendarmes, he informed. (Carlos Galindo, mentioned above, is not a Copwatch member.) Each Copwatch member goes through about two to three hours of training devised with the help of lawyers.

Radio host/activist Carlos Galindo's video from Gran Mercado, right at the beginning of the last MCSO sweep

Copwatch usually films public police activity from about 20 feet away, according to Whitcomb. When an officer or deputy tells them they cannot film, they inform the law enforcement officer of their legal right to do so, and the officer usually relents.Whitcomb also pointed out that when Copwatch is present, the law enforcement officers in question are more likely to do things by the book, smile more, and be polite to the citizens they've halted.

Recently Arpaio has made statements to the media regarding a mysterious new tool he may have to counter those supposedly "interfering" with his deputies' investigations. He's also spoken of activists with video cameras disparagingly. But in 2006, at least, he was singing a different tune.  

Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.

 

Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.

 

Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.