Russell Pearce Cost Arizona a Congressional Seat

Keep New Times Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Phoenix and help keep the future of New Times free.

State Senate President-elect Russell Pearce's SB 1070 either directly or indirectly assisted in Arizona's disappointing census numbers, which resulted in Arizona picking up just one Congressional seat, instead of two.

That's the message from a recent piece in Salon.com by Philadelphia-based journalist Daniel Denvir, "Did immigration law cost Arizona a seat in Congress?" The article is not conclusive, and experts disagree about the extent to which SB 1070 deflated census numbers, but it's obvious that it did have an impact.

Indeed, the stated intent of Pearce's law is "attrition through enforcement." Pearce himself has been upfront about 1070's purpose: Make life difficult enough for the undocumented, and they will "self-deport."

Problem is, the census counts everybody, or it's supposed to, and it only comes around once every ten years. It's from these numbers that Congressional seats are apportioned.

So when people leave the state -- undocumented or not -- it deflates the numbers. That's a no-brainer. Add to that the fact that some Latino groups in Arizona boycotted the census because of 1070, and that plenty of Latinos were wary of completing the census due to the climate of hate and fear here in Sand Land, and you've got a recipe for failure on the Congressional-seat front.

True, the economy, both national and local, was likely the biggest factor in Arizona's not picking up another seat. The recession is also the main reason illegal immigration is down. But Pearce and the hullabaloo over his breathing-while-brown legislation didn't help matters.

There's a lesson here for the local Democrats, too. Their lack of a pushback on 1070 was fatal. If there had been more vocal, mainstream political opposition to 1070 from the get-go, and if it had been sustained throughout the campaign season, I think it would have, to some degree, ameliorated Arizona's atmosphere of bigotry. 

"So what if we only picked up one seat?" I'm sure that's what some out there will say. But why would anyone with a lick of sense want Arizona to have less representation in the U.S. House?

After all, other states such as California, Florida and New York benefited from having everyone counted, as Denvir noted in his piece. But here in Arizona, we seem to be content with shooting ourselves in the proverbial foot until there's no foot left. Or, moving up, no leg. No torso. No brain.

Keep Phoenix New Times Free... Since we started Phoenix New Times, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Phoenix, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Phoenix with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.


Join the New Times community and help support independent local journalism in Phoenix.