Should Joe Arpaio Apologize for Larry Klayman's Homophobic Idiocy?

Due to the fact that "birther" attorney Larry Klayman isn't the best at using electronic mail, and asked if the chairman of the organization trying to recall Sheriff Joe Arpaio is a "homo" who "want[s] my nuts."

See, Klayman wanted to forward an e-mail from Respect Arizona chairman William James Fisher, which contained an innocuous use of the word "nuts."

See also:
-Larry Klayman Asks If Joe Arpaio Recall Chairman Is a "Homo" Who "Want[s] My Nuts"
-Klayman Was Found to Have "Inappropriately Touched" Kids
-Joe Arpaio's Birther Buddies Say They'll Take Recall Effort to Court to Shut It Down

Klayman thought he'd "cc" a buddy on there, but also hit "reply" to Fisher.

"WHAT KINDA NUTS IS TALKING ABOUT," Klayman said, failing to make a coherent sentence. "DOES THIS HOMO WANT MY NUTS! HA. LETS GO TO WAR. BEST, L."

Klayman, who's trying to fight the recall effort against Arpaio, has also teamed up with the "leaders" from the Surprise Tea Party who joined with Arpaio to start the bogus "investigation" into President Obama's investigation.

Klayman, who happens to be friendly with the conspiracy theorists at World Net Daily, and introduced a "birther" affidavit from Arpaio as evidence in an actual courtroom.

So, with Klayman fighting the Arpaio recall, should Arpaio have to apologize for Klayman's homophobic jackassery?

Cast your vote below:

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


All-access pass to the top stories, events and offers around town.

  • Top Stories


All-access pass to top stories, events and offers around town.

Sign Up >

No Thanks!

Remind Me Later >